Contents
0 Summary
1 Mobile TV and video offers real potential for 3G network operators
2 Evidence grows for strong latent demand for mobile TV and video services
- 2.1 TV usage and pay-TV revenues demonstrate the powerful force of TV in the consumer market
- 2.2 '3G TV' may be the antidote to slow 3G take-up
3 W-CDMA is best suited to short, premium-priced video clips
- 3.1 Limitations of W-CDMA networks and handsets constrain the ability to deliver TV and video services
- 3.2 Limited volumes of premium-priced video clips can achieve a balance between revenue per Mbyte and affordability
4 Technology developments are needed for intensive mobile TV and video
- 4.1 W-CDMA HSDPA and advances in video coding are key to enhancing the profitability and quality of 3G video services
- 4.2 Alternatives to 3G macrocells will be required to support extensive delivery of TV or video to mobile phones
- 4.3 Alternatives to broadcasting technology also need to be considered
- 4.4 Developments in mobile devices will be key enablers for mobile TV and video services
- 4.5 Mobile operators must carefully monitor the diverse technological approaches across different markets
- 4.6 Technology must be complemented by other critical ingredients to achieve success with mobile TV and video
- Actions
List of figures and tables
- Figure 0.1 Impact of pricing and data rate on revenue per Mbyte for a three-minute video clip
- Figure 2.1 Comparison of time spent using TV, radio, home Internet and mobile phone services per person per day in the USA and the UK
- Figure 2.2: Growth of EV-DO customers in South Korea
- Figure 2.3: Pro rata annual ARPU for SKT, March 2004
- Figure 2.4: Pro rata annual ARPU for KTF, quarter ending June 2004
- Figure 2.5: Split of SKT June data packets by different content types, October 2003
- Figure 2.6: Split of KTF EV-DO packets by different content types, quarter ending June 2004
- Figure 2.7: Split of June hits by different content types, October 2003
- Figure 2.8: TV session lengths in the Finland mobile TV trial
- Figure 2.9: Time spent viewing individual TV programmes in the Finland mobile TV trial
- Table 3.1: Comparison of Mbyte consumption of various service scenarios
- Figure 3.1: Data consumption of typical mobile data services
- Table 3.2: Revenue per Mbyte for example services
- Figure 3.2: Relationship between cost to end users and programme length for high/low video quality and revenue per Mbyte of USD1/0.5
- Table 3.3: SKT June pricing for TV and video-on-demand services, August 2004
- Table 3.4: KTF fimm pricing for TV and video-on-demand services, August 2004
- Figure 3.3: Revenue (per Mbyte and per download) from download of a three-minute 4.5Mbyte video clip from SKT June and KTF fimm, by different types of user, August 2004
- Table 3.5: Examples of 3 video services in the UK
- Table 3.6: Examples of 3G video-clip services in the UK
- Figure 3.4: Impact of pricing and data rate on revenue per Mbyte for a three-minute video clip
- Table 4.1: Broadcasting options for delivery of TV to mobile devices
|
Related Report
|