Table of Contents
- 0 Summary
- 1. Interest in femtocells is growing, and business cases and service
propositions must be prepared
- 1.1 MNOs are investigating commercial deployment of femtocells
- 1.2 Key questions remain over the success of femtocells
- 2. Operators and equipment vendors must keep a clear commercial focus
on femtocells
- 2.1 MNOs are preparing to launch consumer femtocell propositions in 2008
- 2.2 Operators and vendors must build the case for commercial roll-out
using realistic costs
- 2.3 A business case framework helps MNOs to formulate and execute an
effective femtocell strategy
- 2.4 MNOs should develop compelling service propositions for key market
segments
- 2.5 MNOs should examine alternatives to femtocells
- 3. For voice services alone, the business case for femtocells is
uncertain
- 3.1 MNOs and femtocell vendors have focused first on voice telephony
- 3.2 Increasing affordability of traditional mobile will reduce the
appeal of femtocells
- 3.3 Consumer inertia, mixed marketing messages and possible health
concerns may dampen demand
- 3.4 Voice is not network intensive, limiting 3G network cost savings
- 4. Mobile TV, video and audio make the business case for femtocells
- 4.1 Femtocells could be highly effective for mass-market mobile TV,
video and audio services indoors
- 4.2 Much mobile TV and video usage will be indoors, where femtocells
perform well
- 4.3 Femtocells bring similar benefits for the delivery of radio and
audio in the home
- 4.4 Femtocells are essential to the profitable delivery of affordable
video and audio services in the home
- 4.5 Femtocells could enable big savings on 3G macrocell network costs
- 4.6 Femtocells could allow operators to deploy less dense broadcasting
networks
- 4.7 Mobile video and audio improve the business case for femtocells
- 5. Broadband access and location-aware services add to the case for
femtocells
- 5.1 Femtocells could enable MNOs to offer compelling and profitable
mobile broadband services
- 5.2 Femtocells could enable new location-aware services
- 6. Femtocells are preferable to the alternatives, and MNOs should start
developing propositions
- 6.1 Alternatives to femtocells are less attractive when a broad service
mix is required
- 6.2 MNOs should start to develop compelling propositions based on
femtocells
- 6.3 MNOs should include a video and audio portfolio prior to femtocell
launch
Actions
Companies discussed in this report:
- Vodafone
- BT
- France Telecom
- ip.access
- Tatara Systems
- Sprint
- O2.
List of Figures and Tables
- Figure 0.1: Major revenue and cost elements of an MNO' s business
case for femtocells
- Figure 2.1: Major revenue and cost elements of an MNO' s business
case for femtocells
- Figure 3.1: Increase in the proportion of mobile-originated voice
traffic in Western Europe as the mobile price premium has decreased, 1Q 2004
to 4Q 2006
- Figure 3.2: Increase in the proportion of mobile-originated voice
traffic in Finland with lower average spend per mobile minute, 1Q 2004 to 4Q
2006
- Figure 3.3: Mobile-originated voice traffic compared to mobile
price premium in various Western European countries, 4Q 2006
- Table 3.1: Comparison of network capacity consumption by a range of
services
- Table 3.2: Summary of the business case for deployment of
femtocells to support voice services in a variety of scenarios
- Figure 3.4: MNO' s costs associated with femtocell deployment for
four voice telephony scenarios
- Figure 3.5: MNO' s revenue gains associated with femtocell
deployment for four voice telephony scenarios
- Table 4.1: Estimated indoor usage of mobile TV services based on
DVB-H trials
- Table 4.2: Estimated indoor usage of mobile radio services based on
UK DAB-IP trials
- Table 4.3: Estimated revenue per megabyte from indoor service use,
taking into account variable network cost
- Table 4.4: Amount of data diverted from a 3G macrocell network by
femtocell use: an example usage profile
- Table 4.5: Summary of the business case for deployment of
femtocells to support voice, video and audio services in a variety of scenarios
- Figure 4.1: MNO' s costs associated with femtocell deployment for
four voice and non-voice scenarios
- Figure 4.2: MNO' s revenue gains and cost savings associated with
femtocell deployment for four voice and non-voice scenarios
- Table 5.1: Examples of mobile broadband services currently offered
by MNOs
- Table 6.1: Examples of femtocell service propositions to appeal to
different market segments
|
Related Report
|