Executive summary
1. Introduction
2. Why do companies partner late-stage compounds?
- 2.1. Summary
- 2.2. The role of partnering in corporate strategy
- 2.2.1. Licensing out
- 2.2.2. Licensing in
- 2.3. Partnering for revenue
- 2.4. Partnering in for pipeline development
- 2.4.1. Case studies
- 2.4.1.1. Bristol-Myers Squibbs approach to in-licensing
- 2.4.1.2. GlaxoSmithKlines approach to in-licensing
3. The evolving role of partnering in biopharmaceutical development
- 3.1. Summary
- 3.2. Licensing to partnering
- 3.3. The traditional licensing model
- 3.4. The evolution from licensing to partnering
- 3.5. Sharing risk and reward
- 3.5.1. Phase I to II stage deals
- Excerpt 3.1 Roche-Kosan agreement dated September 2002
- 3.5.2. Phase III stage deals
- 3.5.2.1. Case study Genome Therapeutics - Versicor
- Excerpt 3.2 Genome-Biosearch Italia agreement dated October 2001
- 3.5.3. Filed and marketed product stage deals
- 3.6. Sharing knowledge
- 3.7. What has been learned from the partnering model?
- 3.8. Complex partnering models
- 3.8.1. Process
- 3.8.2. Structure
- 3.8.3. Financing
- 3.9. Future trends
- 3.9.1. Biotechs competing with pharma for deals
4. Late-stage deal strategies and structures
- 4.1. Summary
- 4.2. Considering the deal
- 4.3. When do companies partner?
- 4.3.1. License early
- 4.3.1.1. Early stage case studies
- Case study 4.1 Genentech-Dendreon
- Case study 4.2 Roche-Vernalis
- Case study 4.3 Roche-Antisoma
- 4.3.2. License late
- 4.3.2.1. Late-stage case studies
- Case study 4.4 Idenix-Novartis (development stage)
- Case study 4.5 Eli Lilly-Amylin (development stage)
- Case study 4.6 Genta-Aventis (development stage)
- Case study 4.7 Isis-Eyetech (development stage)
- Case study 4.8 King-Aventis (marketed products)
- Case study 4.9 Cubist-Chiron (FDA-approved)
- Case study 4.10 First Horizon-AstraZeneca (product acquisition)
- 4.3.3. University licensing
- Case study 4.11 Scripps Research Institute-Cyanotech
- 4.4. Early and late-stage deals-a cost comparison
- 4.4.1. What do companies spend on partnering?
- 4.5. Licensing strategy case studies
- Case study 4.12 Neurocrine Biosciences
- Case study 4.13 Actelion
- Case study 4.14 Vicuron Pharmaceuticals (previously BioSearch Italia)
- Case study 4.15 ImClone Systems
- Case study 4.16 SkinMedica
- Case study 4.17 Galen Holdings
- 4.6. Deal types
5. Payment strategies
- 5.1. Summary
- 5.2. Deciding a strategy
- 5.3. Payment options
- 5.3.1. Upfront payments
- 5.3.1.1. Conditionality of upfront payments
- 5.3.2. Loans
- 5.3.3. Convertible loans
- 5.3.4. Equity
- 5.3.5. R&D funding
- 5.3.6. Annual fixed payments
- 5.3.7. Milestone payments
- 5.3.8. Innovative forms of payment-quids
- 5.3.8.1. Products
- 5.3.8.2. Extended rights to pipeline/technology
- 5.3.8.3. Skills transfer
- 5.3.8.4. Public relations
- 5.3.8.5. Other quids
- 5.3.9. Royalties
- 5.3.9.1. Issues affecting royalty rates
- 5.3.9.2. Royalties on combination products
- Case study 5.1 Scripps Research Institute-Cyanotech
- 5.3.9.3. Guaranteed minimum/maximum annual payments
- 5.3.9.4. Royalty stacking
- 5.3.9.5. Royalties and supply/purchase contracts
- 5.3.10. Option payments
- Case study 5.2 Neotherapeutics (now Spectrum)-Johnson Matthey
6. How to make the right deal
- 6.1. Summary
- 6.2. Constructing the deal
- 6.3. Finding the right partner
- 6.3.1. What attracts a partner?
- 6.3.2. Where to look for a partner
- 6.3.3. Sources of information
- 6.3.4. Building a network
- 6.3.4.1. Late-stage networking events
- 6.3.4.2. Networking for biopharmaceutical executives
- 6.3.5. Becoming partner of choice
- 6.4. Deal timeframes
- 6.5. Deal valuation
- 6.5.1. Factors contributing to the deal valuation
- 6.5.1.1. Intellectual property
- 6.5.1.2. Development phase
- 6.5.1.3. Cost of clinical trials
- 6.5.1.4. Time to commercialization
- 6.5.1.5. Benchmark values
- 6.5.1.6. Clinical data
- 6.5.1.7. Risk of failure
- 6.5.1.8. Size and value of therapeutic market
- 6.5.1.9. Pricing and reimbursement
- 6.5.1.10. Competition for licensing rights
- Case study 6.1 Celltech CDP 870
- Case study 6.2 Genentech-OSI
- 6.5.1.11. Partners expertise/reputation in given field
- 6.5.1.12. Impact on internal R&D programs
- 6.5.2. Due diligence as a valuation tool
- 6.6. Guidelines for late stage deal payments
- 6.6.1. Upfront payments
- 6.6.2. Milestone payments
- 6.6.3. Royalties
- 6.7. Keeping a deal successful
- 6.7.1. Commitment to the deal
- 6.7.2. Know your partner
- 6.7.3. Thorough due diligence
- 6.7.4. Patent and IP management
- 6.7.5. Comprehensive deal agreement
- 6.7.6. Feasible and achievable milestones
- 6.7.7. Proactive management of issues
- 6.7.8. Regular communication
- 6.7.9. Tracking of payments and royalties
- 6.8. When to negotiate termination
- 6.9. What makes a deal newsworthy?
7. Deal terms and trends-a data analysis of early-stage deals
- 7.1. Summary
- 7.2. Putting it into practice
- 7.3. Public data
- 7.4. Survey data
- 7.5. Headline valuations
- 7.6. Components of the deal
- 7.6.1. Equity involvement
- 7.6.1.1. Upfront payments
- 7.6.1.2. Milestone payments
- 7.6.1.3. Royalty rates
- 7.7. Late-stage deal details
8. Appendices
- 8.1. Glossary of terms
- 8.2. Resources
- 8.3. Complex deal terms: an outline
- 8.4. Late-stage partnering agreements
- 8.5. Payment clause from Spectrum-Johnson Matthey, August 2001
- 8.6. Press releases 1
- Excerpt 3.1 1
- Excerpt 3.2 1
- Case study 4.1 Genentech-Dendreon 1
- Case study 4.2 Roche-Vernalis
- Case study 4.3 Roche-Antisoma 1
- Case study 4.4 Idenix-Novartis (development stage)
- Case study 4.5 Eli Lilly-Amylin (development stage)
- Case study 4.6 Genta-Aventis (development stage)
- Case study 4.7 Isis-Eyetech (development stage)
- Case study 4.8 King-Aventis (marketed products)
- Case study 4.9 Cubist-Chiron (FDA-approved)
- Case study 4.10 First Horizon-AstraZeneca (product acquisition)
- Case study 4.12 Neurocrine Biosciences
- Case study 4.13 Actelion
- Case study 4.14 Vicuron Pharmaceuticals (previously BioSearch Italia)
- Case study 4.15 ImClone Systems
- Case study 4.17 Galen Holdings
- Case study 5.2 Neotherapeutics (now Spectrum)-Johnson Matthey
- Case study 6.2 Genentech-OSI
- 8.7. References
|
Related Report
|