the-infoshop.com - The vertical markets research portal
View CartView Cart
Global Information, Inc.
US: +1-860-674-8796
EU: +32-2-535-7543
SG: +65-6223-2436
  Home | Category | Publishers | Custom Research | E-mail Alert | About Us | Contact Us | Site Map |
 

* View All Categories
View Conferences
Japanese Korean Chinese

Market Research Report

Building an Effective Regulatory Relationship with the FDA

Published by Best Practices, LLC Contact us : +1-860-674-8796
Published 2009/07 Content info 80 Pages
Product code BEPR94428
Price From  US $ 7000 Order/Price list
US $ 7000 PDF by E-mail (Single User License) & Hard Copy
US $ 21000 PDF by E-mail (Site User License) + 1 Hard Copy
US $ 35000 PDF by E-mail (Corporate User License) + 1 Hard Copy
Delivery Time
PDF by E-Mail
Approx. 1-2 business days
Hard Copy/CD-ROM
Approx. 3-4 business days
If you need expedited delivery, please call us.
Description TOC

Abstract

Though science remains the fundamental engine behind successful New Drug Applications, effective communication between pharmaceutical companies and the FDA at each stage of this process stands as a vital ingredient in securing approval for a new therapy.

Applicant companies that frequently gain approval and first approvals - and avoid delays or, worse, the nebulous and costly "complete response" letter - brandish not only good science but also cultivate and sustain strong working relationships with the FDA and its staff.

The topic of informal working relationships between pharmaceutical representatives and the FDA is a sensitive one for all parties. Regulatory officials in pharma hold distinct views on what characterize effective communication strategies and tactics with the agency.

This report delivers benchmarks and insights that identify approaches for understanding and effectively interacting with the FDA. The research is based on detailed survey data from Regulatory Affairs executives and managers from 15 top pharmaceutical companies. The report includes insights gleaned from interviews with 13 Regulatory executives who boast extensive experience with NDAs and the FDA.

Industries Profiled:

  • Pharmaceutical; Biotech; Consumer Products; Diagnostic; Manufacturing; Health Care; Chemical

Companies Profiled:

  • Alcon; Amgen; AstraZeneca; Bayer; Boehringer Ingelheim; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly & Co.; Genentech; Medtronic; Merck; Novartis; Roche; Solvay; United Therapeutics; Valeant; Wyeth

STUDY SNAPSHOT

Regulatory Affairs executives and managers will benefit from research that focuses on the following major topic areas:

Organizational Structure and Alignment

  • Discusses placing oversight of FDA interactions within U.S.-based Regulatory Affairs office, aligning Regulatory staff structure to reflect the structure of key FDA offices and divisions, and keeping Regulatory as the centralized leader in all interactions with the FDA

Regulatory Skills Sets and Capabilities

  • Examines Science versus Regulatory experience in filling key positions and the process of integrating multiple backgrounds and skill sets into Regulatory' s talent pool

Understanding the FDA and the Washington Ecosystem

  • Discusses the role of personnel and divisional idiosyncrasies within the FDA, the importance of following chain of command when working with the FDA, and the value of establishing a positive reputation with the FDA and in Washington

Building Effective Relationships

  • Outlines the optimal parameters for both formal and informal relationships with the FDA, including best channels for communication and ongoing dialogue

Planning and Preparation for the NDA

  • Details effective preparation for the NDA, Regulatory and Clinical collaborative strategy, and the development of sound negotiation positions and operational leadership

Safety and Risk Management

  • Evaluates ways to manage FDA concerns and examines the changing safety landscape

KEY FINDINGS

Organizational Structure

Four-fifths of all companies in this research are either a U.S.-based company that places oversight of FDA interactions within headquarters or are companies not based in the U.S. that place such oversight with their U.S. subsidiary offices. No benchmarked companies use a decentralized structure as this would hinder oversight of corporate FDA interactions. Nearly two-thirds of the benchmark partners are highly centralized in how they oversee FDA interactions.

Hiring for Regulatory Affairs

Most Regulatory staffs have few former FDA employees, let alone former top-level FDA employees. Some research participants said that only former agency officials who were highly placed in the administration will benefit organizations when it comes to working with the FDA, citing a tendency in lower-level former FDA employees toward bureaucracy.

Managing an NDA

Avoid level-skipping to accelerate a decision. Level-skipping can cause longer-term resentment, distrust and harm to your NDA within the FDA. In addition, eighty percent of benchmark partners see the designation of a single point of contact for FDA communications during the NDA process as the most effective approach to creating and maintaining successful interactions with the agency.

Related Report
Back to Top
Please inform me when related publications are released
InfoWatch

US: 1-860-674-8796 EU: 32-2-535-7543 SG: 65-6223-2436
The vertical markets research portal
© 2009, the-infoshop.com by Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.