Abstract
With global economic headwinds gathering at an alarming pace, Hong
Kong’s economy looks set to be buffeted more violently than
initially expected. With this in mind, we have revised down our growth
forecasts for the country and are now anticipating a contraction in real GDP
in 2009 before a mild recovery takes place in 2010. This report is
being written at a time when the global financial crisis, which arose as a
result of the evaporation of inter-bank liquidity, has moved into a new
phase. Stock market participants appear, reasonably, to have taken the
view that the policy responses taken by governments, central banks and
multi-lateral institutions will be sufficient to prevent a total collapse of
the global financial system. Instead, stock market participants are
focusing on the impact of a near-global recession on the earnings of
non-financial companies. The number and size of stand-by facilities agreed
by the IMF since early October supports our view that, of the emerging
markets whose commercial banking sectors are surveyed by BMI, the countries
of Central and Eastern Europe are those whose economies are most at risk
of suffering adverse affects as a result of the global financial crisis.
This is partly because the macroeconomic imbalances are relatively severe
and partly because the Central and Eastern European countries are more
directly affected by the brutal recession that is unfolding in wealthier
member states of the EU. As yet, it has not been possible to collate hard
numbers, for most of the countries whose commercial banking sectors are
surveyed by BMI, that clearly quantify the impact of the global financial
crisis on the banks. As we explain in the section that discusses changes
that we are making to the report, we again include a lengthy essay which
attempts to identify the key issues. In essence, in the emerging markets
– and, indeed, the developed countries – of the Asia-Pacific,
commercial banks appear well placed to deal with the crisis. The same is,
broadly, true of commercial banks in the various countries of the Middle
East and North Africa. Latin America, Chile, Brazil, Mexico and Colombia
appear better placed than Argentina, Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador. South
Africa’s situation appears to have much in common with that of
Brazil. In contrast, Nigeria faces some of the same challenges as those that
confront Venezuela. The positions of most countries in Central and Eastern
Europe, however, are alarming. From Q209, we will include data that
pertains to late 2008 and extend forecasts out to 2013. We will also
incorporate much greater discussion of the various protagonists in each
country’s commercial banking sector and a number of new features. We
believe that the figures we compiled in mid-2008 provide insights as to
how the various commercial banking sectors will fare in the current, extremely
uncertain, climate. We have, therefore, left them essentially
unchanged. The figures on the tables above provide a snapshot of the
banking sector in Hong Kong prior to the onset of the global financial
crisis. To place the figures in context, it may be useful to bear in mind
certain aspects of the 59 countries whose banking sectors are currently
surveyed by BMI. Across this sample, the median growth in assets in local
currency terms was 21.3% (in Colombia), the median loan growth was 21.6%
(in India) and the median growth in deposits was 17.9% (in Brazil). On
their own, the ratios of loans to deposits, assets and GDP mean little.
However, they can provide useful hints when combined with other data.
Across the 59 countries, the median loan/deposit ratio is 92.3% (in
Greece), the median loan/asset ratio is 56.0% (in Poland) and the median
loan/GDP ratio was 63.9% in India. As in previous reports, we include
a SWOT analysis for Hong Kong. A general theme of this report is that Hong
Kong’s position as the most important international financial services
centre in Asia, specifically, the gateway through which capital is most
likely to flow out from China, appears unassailable. Countering this, Hong
Kong remains vulnerable to an economic hard landing in China and/or the
USA. Since Q108, we have calculated, on a consistent basis, a Commercial
Bank Business Environment Rating (CBBER) for each of the 59 countries
surveyed. The CBBER includes an assessment of the limits of potential
returns. It does this by taking into account the size, growth potential and
bancassurance potential of the banking sector, as well as aspects of the
economy in 2007. The CBBER also depends on an assessment of the risks to
the realisation of potential returns. This reflects BMI’s assessments of
overall country risk, together with the regulatory and competitive
environment. Hong Kong’s overall CBBER is 81.6. The market structure
element of the limits to potential returns is roughly comparable to the
country element, with scores of 79.4 and 78.9, respectively. However, the
market risks element of the risks to the realisation of returns scores more
highly than the country risks of the realisation of potential returns,
with respective scores of 96.7 and 80.9.
|
Related Report
|