Abstract
The principal factor affecting the Hungarian economy in 2009-2010 will be a
deep recession owing to both external and domestic influences. We expect
eurozone GDP to contract sharply this year and recovering to only mediocre
growth in the next, which will weigh significantly on demand for Hungarian
exports. In particular, with Germany entering technical recession in Q308,
demand for high-value Hungarian manufactured goods such as auto-parts is
likely to continue to suffer, and this is already being reflected in the
industrial production data. The domestic economic outlook is similarly dire
with credit markets due to stay restricted, construction and retail sales
contracting, unemployment rising and consumer and business sentiment
hitting record lows. In turn, the recessionary outlook is set to impact
upon political stability. We expect the Hungarian Socialist Party (MSZP)
minority government to endure through 2009, due mainly to the de facto
backing of the Alliance of Free Democrats (SZDSZ). However, we caution
that the government’s policymaking ability and reformist drive will be
further curtailed by public unpopularity and parliamentary weakness.
This report is being written at a time when the global financial crisis, which
arose as a result of the evaporation of inter-bank liquidity, has moved
into a new phase. Stock market participants appear, reasonably, to have
taken the view that the policy responses taken by governments, central banks
and multi-lateral institutions will be sufficient to prevent a total
collapse of the global financial system. Instead, stock market
participants are focusing on the impact of a near-global recession on the
earnings of non-financial companies. The number and size of stand-by
facilities agreed by the IMF since early October supports our view that,
of the emerging markets whose commercial banking sectors are surveyed by BMI,
the countries of Central and Eastern Europe are those whose economies are
most at risk of suffering adverse affects as a result of the global
financial crisis. This is partly because the macroeconomic imbalances are
relatively severe and partly because the Central and Eastern European
countries are more directly affected by the brutal recession that is
unfolding in wealthier member states of the EU. As yet, it has not been
possible to collate hard numbers, for most of the countries whose
commercial banking sectors are surveyed by BMI, that clearly quantify the
impact of the global financial crisis on the banks. As we explain in the
section that discusses changes that we are making to the report, we again
include a lengthy essay which attempts to identify the key issues. In essence,
in the emerging markets – and, indeed, the developed countries
– of the Asia-Pacific, commercial banks appear well placed to deal
with the crisis. The same is, broadly, true of commercial banks in the various
countries of the Middle East and North Africa. Latin America, Chile,
Brazil, Mexico and Colombia appear better placed than Argentina,
Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador. South Africa’s situation appears to have
much in common with that of Brazil. In contrast, Nigeria faces some of the
same challenges as those that confront Venezuela. The positions of most
countries in Central and Eastern Europe, however, are alarming. From Q209,
we will include data that pertains to late 2008 and extend forecasts out to
2013. We will also incorporate much greater discussion of the various
protagonists in each country’s commercial banking sector and a
number of new features. We believe that the figures we compiled in mid-2008
provide insights as to how the various commercial banking sectors will
fare in the current, extremely uncertain, climate. We have, therefore,
left them essentially unchanged. The figures on the tables above provide a
snapshot of the banking sector in Hungary prior to the onset of the global
financial crisis. To place the figures in context, it may be useful to bear in
mind certain aspects of the 59 countries whose banking sectors are
currently surveyed by BMI. Across this sample, the median growth in assets
in local currency terms was 21.3% (in Colombia), the median loan growth was
21.6% (in India) and the median growth in deposits was 17.9% (in
Brazil). On their own, the ratios of loans to deposits, assets and GDP
mean little. However, they can provide useful hints when combined with
other data. Across the 59 countries, the median loan/deposit ratio is
92.3% (in Greece), the median loan/asset ratio is 56.0% (in Poland) and the
median loan/GDP ratio was 63.9% in India. As in previous reports, we
include a SWOT analysis for Hungary. The banking sector benefits from
being within a full member of the eurozone and a country where the
regulatory framework is sound. The main challenges come from the
adjustments that will have to be made in Hungary to resolve major
imbalances, such as the current account. Since Q108, we have
calculated, on a consistent basis, a Commercial Bank Business Environment
Rating (CBBER) for each of the 59 countries surveyed. The CBBER includes
an assessment of the limits of potential returns. It does this by taking
into account the size, growth potential and bancassurance potential of the
banking sector, as well as aspects of the economy in 2007. The CBBER also
depends on an assessment of the risks to the realisation of potential
returns. This reflects BMI’s assessments of overall country risk,
together with the regulatory and competitive environment. Hungary’s
overall CBBER is 65.1. The banking market structure of the limits to potential
returns has a are significantly lower than the country structure with
scores of 54.4 and 70.5 respectively. Conversely, the banking market risks
of the risks to the realisation of returns are slightly higher than the
country risks rating with respective scores of 76.7 and 74.1. In the
context of the region, Hungary’s CBBER is high.
|
Related Report
|