Abstract
In BMI’s updated Business Environment Rankings (BER) for Q309, Israel
continued slipping down the table, now ranking seventh out of the 17
Middle East and African (MEA) markets surveyed. While the country scores
strongly across the country structure and the country risk categories, a risky
regulatory environment, particularly in regard to intellectual provisions
(IP) provisions, serves to limit Israel’s overall attractiveness for
multinational drugmakers. Moreover, although Israel’s IP environment has
been criticised for deteriorating in the past decade, the country seems to
have no plans to improve the situation, which will continue to weigh down
on Israel’s placement within BMI’s MEA matrix. In the
meantime, Israel once again featured in the ‘Priority Watch List’
of countries with deficient IP regimes, which is produced as part of the
2009 version of the Special 301 Submission by the Pharmaceutical Research
and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA). Key points of contention include the
lack of adequate patent and data exclusivity protection and regulatory
approval delays. While the latter has been addressed to a degree,
insufficient budgetary support remains a major obstacle to establishing a
better system for processing marketing applications, which will continue to be
biased against foreignmade patented drugs. In addition to the IP
issues that stifle the development of the innovative patented market segment,
the economic situation (such as the forecast 1.8% GDP contraction in 2009)
and political environment will conspire to result in a slow growth of the
Israeli pharmaceutical market over the next five years. From the 2008
market value of ISL5.46bn (US$1.53bn) at retail prices, the market will grow
to just ILS5.98bn (US$1.57bn) in 2013, posting a compound annual growth
rate (CAGR) of just 1.83% in local currency terms (and of just 0.62% in US
dollar terms). Per capita spending on drugs will, however, stagnate at
around US$207 estimated in 2008, as cost-containment negates any volume
increases. An increasing reliance on imports of non-patented medicines
will also subdue growth as the government seeks to cut healthcare costs.
While prescription medicines will continue to account for the majority of the
market by value, economic recovery will once again boost the uptake of
OTCs, especially in the face of a restrictive pricing and reimbursement
environment. In the meantime, Israeli healthcare coverage continues to be
criticised by international bodies. In March 2009, the Physicians for
Human Rights (PHR) group called for amendments to the state policy
prohibiting children who are not currently under permanent residential status
access to healthcare. Despite the fact that Israeli legislation stipulates
a basic healthcare package for foreign workers, children continue to be
excluded from the system due to inconsistent and unrealistic criteria that
need to be met in order to qualify for the health coverage. Disallowing
coverage to those with a Palestinian parent also highlights a degree of
prevailing intolerance with no sound basis, which will continue to draw
international criticism and influence Israel’s attractiveness as a
business destination.
|