Abstract
Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has pushed for an increase
of more than 50% in Brazilian defence spending through to 2010. The
country is developing a national defence plan, which may include
increasing troop numbers in the Amazon, building nuclear and conventional
submarines to protect offshore oil fields and modernise its weapons
industry. It has signed an agreement with France to buy 50 military
helicopters and five submarines, including one nuclear-powered vessel, the
value of which could exceed $11bn. A seriously deteriorating economy could
put pressure on these plans. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva
remains under pressure. The opposition Partido Movimento Democrático
Brasileiro (PMDB) has control of both houses of parliament, and is seeking
greater influence on national politics. This could threaten the ruling
coalition and we wait to see if the PMDB will support Lula’s
presidential candidate, Dilma Rousseff, in next year’s poll. Our
outlook for Brazil’s economy has deteriorated – we expect a
contraction of 0.6 per cent this year, with consumption and overall output
unlikely to recover this year. The main means of bolstering the economy
available to Lula are stimulus packages, and in mid-May the China Development
Bank gave $800 billion to its Brazilian counterpart, known as BNDES, to
shore up its cash amid the financial crisis. This quarter, we have
introduced a significant new aspect to BMI’s Defence reports, which is
the City Terrorism Rating (CTR). This assesses the risk of a terrorist
attack. The CTR takes into account the overall BMI Terrorism Rating for
the country in question. It also incorporates the ‘prevalence’
of terrorism, which recognises the frequency of attacks, and whether the
city is a target for terrorists. The CTR also recognises the
‘threat’ of terrorism in terms of the likely numbers of victims
and the ability of groups to launch sustained campaigns. In Brazil we
assess the CTRs for Brasilia, Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo. These
City-Specific Ratings are created via an integration of the state-wide
threat, with an evaluation of the city-specific characteristics and level
of activity.
|