the-infoshop.com - The vertical markets research portal
View CartView Cart
Global Information, Inc.
US: +1-860-674-8796
EU: +32-2-535-7543
SG: +65-6223-2436
  Home | Category | Publishers | Custom Research | E-mail Alert | About Us | Contact Us | Site Map |
 

* View All Categories
View Conferences
Japanese Korean Chinese

Market Research Report

Biosimilars: Regulatory Issues - Europe continues to make strides while the US lags behind

Published by Datamonitor Contact us : +1-860-674-8796
Published 2006/12 Content info  
Product code DC47697
Price From  US $ 3800 Order/Price list
US $ 3800 PDF by E-mail (Single User License)
US $ 9500 PDF by E-mail (Global License)
Delivery Time
PDF by E-Mail
Approx. 1-2 business days
Hard Copy/CD-ROM
Approx. 3-4 business days
If you need expedited delivery, please call us.
Description TOC

Table of Contents

  • CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
    • Scope of the report
    • Key findings
    • Key definitions
  • CHAPTER 2 OVERVIEW OF BIOSIMILARS AND HOW REGULATORY ISSUES IMPACT THE MARKET
    • The potential for cost savings drives the development of a biosimilars regulatory approval pathway
    • Recombinant proteins are the key target for biosimilar developers
    • The complexity of the biosimilars regulatory environment is a key factor restricting biosimilars developers
  • CHAPTER 3 THE POWER BALANCE BETWEEN PRO-BIOSIMILARS AND ANTI-BIOSIMILARS SHAPES MARKET EVOLUTION
    • The current situation: the US lags further behind as the issue becomes more politically charged
      • Currently, the European environment is more pro-biosimilars than the US
      • The stronger position for innovator biologics companies in the US means that greater political pressure is required to support the development of a biosimilars regulatory approval pathway
    • Whoever wins the battle between the pro-biosimilars faction and the anti-biosimilars faction will significantly impact the way that the biosimilars market evolves in the US and Europe
      • There are significant difficulties with demonstrating comparability
        • Why is comparability such a problem?
        • Comparability is therefore a key issue for biosimilars, and stringent requirements boost development costs
        • The importance of choosing the right reference product to demonstrate comparability
        • Although there are extensive comparability requirements, it is important that biosimilar developers seek guidance from European and US regulatory bodies
        • Problems with establishing ' sameness' means that generic substitution is unlikely to be relevant for biosimilars
      • Does the process make the product? And if so, are biosimilar developers asking regulatory bodies to act illegally?
        • In the past, innovator drug companies have been happy to support the argument that biologics manufactured in entirely different ways are the same as the innovator drug
        • It is becoming easier to demonstrate comparability
        • Safety remains the key to determining comparability
  • CHAPTER 4 THE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT FOR BIOSIMILARS IN THE US
    • Introduction to the approval process for generics in the US and how biosimilar approvals fit into this process
    • Key events shaping the development of a biosimilars approval pathway: the FDA changes tack in 2004, delaying biosimilars market entry
      • From 2001 to 2004, the FDA prioritized developing guidance for biosimilars, despite attacks from innovator developers
      • The resignation of McClellan in 2004 led to delays in the development of guidance for biosimilars
        • FDA workshops do little to accelerate progress, while the development of a regulatory pathway stalls
        • Biosimilar developers turn to the USP to help find a way to accelerate the development of a regulatory pathway for biosimilars of NDA biologics by characterizing comparability between biosimilars and innovator biologics
        • Innovator biologics companies retaliate by issuing a white paper, hoping to stall the process further
      • Despite significant resistance from innovator biologics companies, some progress in the development of a biosimilar regulatory process is now being made in the US
        • Hatch and Waxman urge the FDA to provide guidelines on approvals of biosimilars of NDA biologics
        • Citizen petition lobbies the FDA to provide requirements for the approval of biosimilar versions of NDA biologics
        • The ' Access to Life-Saving Medicine' Act represents the largest stride in developing a biosimilars approval pathway
        • While progress in developing a biosimilars regulatory pathway stalls, biosimilar developers are using the full submission pathway
    • The battle to get Omnitrope approved: the biosimilar submission and approval record at the FDA
      • Is Omnitrope really the first follow-on biologic to be approved?
      • Omnitrope' s approval in the US: it may not have been the first follow-on biologic approved under Section 505(b)(2) but it has created the greatest interest
  • CHAPTER 5 THE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT FOR BIOSIMILARS IN EUROPE
    • A range of directives and guidelines are used to shape the biosimilar regulatory environment in Europe
      • Overarching directives and guidelines shaping biosimilar approvals
        • The Pharma Review 2001 kicks off biosimilar approval pathway discussion
      • Product class guidelines help to guide biosimilar approvals for the major recombinant protein classes
      • Comparability guidelines provide essential information on how to demonstrate comparability between biosimilars and innovator biologics
      • Quality guidelines developed to help innovator drugs companies get around inter-batch variability can be used by biosimilar developers to show comparability
      • Non-clinical and clinical issues help shape what type of data is included in the biosimilar submission dossier
      • Additional legislation impacting biosimilars: Directive 2004/27/EC redefines exclusivity and affirms the Bolar provision
    • Biosimilar submission and approval record at the EMEA: Europe has been a more favorable environment for biosimilar approvals
  • CHAPTER 6 BIBLIOGRAPHY
    • Publications and online articles
    • Datamonitor resources
  • CHAPTER 7 GLOSSARY
    • Glossary of terms
    • List of Tables
      • Table 1: Differences in the development and regulatory approval pathway between biosimilars and small molecule generics
      • Table 2: Adopted guidelines for European biosimilars, by submission/adoption date, 2003-06 (the most recent are first)
      • Table 3: Different product classes have different efficacy and safety requirements
    • List of Figures
      • Figure 1: The biologics market has grown at a stronger rate than the overall market
      • Figure 2: Biosimilar development could take six to nine years
      • Figure 3: A range of situations require comparability testing
      • Figure 4: The FDA were pro-biosimilar development in the five-year period, from 1999 to 2004
      • Figure 5: The FDA became anti-biosimilar development in the two-year period from 2004 to 2005
      • Figure 6: The Access to Life-Saving Medicine Act rewards biosimilar development using three key incentives
      • Figure 7: Key biosimilar regulatory guidelines
Related Report
Back to Top
Please inform me when related publications are released
InfoWatch

US: 1-860-674-8796 EU: 32-2-535-7543 SG: 65-6223-2436
The vertical markets research portal
© 2009, the-infoshop.com by Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.