Table of Contents
DATAMONITOR VIEW 1 CATALYST 1 SUMMARY 1 ANALYSIS 2 Gas Market
Overview 2 Industry Landscape 2 Retail Market Players 2 Regulation
2 Gas Supply and Demand Analysis 3 Gas Infrastructure 6 Pipelines
6 Storage 8 LNG 8 Electricity Market Overview 9 Industry
Landscape 9 Retail Market Players 9 Regulation 9 Electricity
Supply and Demand Analysis 10 Electricity Infrastructure 15 Generation
Capacity 15 Electricity Networks 16 Competitive Intensity Analysis
Overview 18 Datamonitor' s MCI Index offers a robust framework for
measuring the development of energy Market Competitive Intensity 18 The
MCI Index shows how competitive a particular market is. This has applications
for both new entrants seeking to enter the market, and established players and
former monopoly incumbents seeking to defined their market share from new
entrants. 18 The MCI Index assesses markets as they stood in early 2009
and forecasts conditions likely to be prevailing in July 2012, five years
after full market opening. 18 The MCI assessment draws on nine underlying
metrics grouped into three broad clusters: Market framework; Supplier Push;
Customer Pull 19 Each of the nine pillars has an assessment scale to allow
for the comparison of diverse markets (see appendix for more details) 20
Gas Market Competitive Intensity 21 The gas market is dominated by two key
suppliers with the regulatory framework and tariff barriers making market
entry difficult to achieve 21 Very limited viability currently exists for
new players in the Lithuanian gas market 22 Lithuania' s gas Market
Framework factors will remain modest 22 Effectiveness of Regulator [2009:
2.5/10 2012: 3/10] 22 Ease of Third Party Access [2009: 2/10 2012: 2.5/10]
22 Pricing Regime [2009: 2/10 2012: 3/10] 22 Supplier Push metrics are
all at the bottom end of the scale in the current climate 23 Wholesale
Market Fragmentation [2009: 0.5/10 2012: 1/10] 23 Retail Market
Fragmentation [2009: 0.1/10 2012: 0.1/10] 23 Traded Market Maturity [2009:
0.1/10 2012: 0.1/10] 23 Customer Pull metrics largely remain at the lower
range of the scale 23 Access to Market Information and Assistance [2009:
0.5/10 2012: 1/10] 23 Consumer Representation [2009: 1/10 2012: 2/10]
23 Propensity to Switch [2009: 0.1/10 2012: 0.5/10] 23 Electricity
Market Competitive Intensity 24 Competition in Lithuania remains limited
due to a number of remaining regulatory and tariff barriers 24 Scope for
new entrants to the Lithuania power market remains inherently limited 25
The Market Framework metrics remain a key flaw in Lithuania' s overall score
25 Effectiveness of Regulator [2009: 2.5/10 2012: 3.5/10] 25 Ease of
Third Party Access [2009: 1/10 2012: 1.5/10] 26 Pricing Regime [2009: 1/10
2012: 1.5/10] 26 The dominance of a number of key utilities curtails the
Supplier Push scores 26 Wholesale Market Fragmentation [2009: 2/10 2012:
2.5/10] 26 Retail Market Fragmentation [2009: 0.1/10 2012: 0.5/10] 26
Traded Market Maturity [2009: 1/10 2012: 1.5/10] 26 Customer Pull metrics
play only a minor role in the current market structure 27 Access to Market
Information and Assistance [2009: 1/10 2012: 1.5/10] 27 Consumer
Representation [2009: 1/10 2012: 2/10] 27 Propensity to Switch [2009:
0.1/10 2012: 0.5/10] 27 COMPETITIVE INTENSITY ANALYSIS APPENDIX 29 MCI
Scores Summary 29 MCI Scoring Scales 32 APPENDIX 37 List of power
stations in Lithuania 37 Definitions 37 Ask the analyst 39
Datamonitor consulting 39 Disclaimer 39 List of Tables Table 1:
Lithuania major gas retail players 2 Table 2: Lithuania gas supply and
demand balance, 2007-08e 4 Table 3: Lithuania gas transmission pipelines
7 Table 4: Lithuania gas storage sites 8 Table 5: Lithuania major
power retail players 9 Table 6: Lithuania power supply and demand balance,
2007-08e 11 Table 7: Lithuania system capacity 17 Table 8: Market
Competitive Intensity, Lithuania 2009 and 2012 29 Table 9: MCI Additive,
Europe 2009 and 2012 30 Table 10: MCI Multiplicative, Europe 2009 and 2012
31 Table 11: Lithuania power generation assets 37 List of Figures
Figure 1: Lithuania gas sectoral consumption, 2008e 5 Figure 2:
Lithuania gas consumption, trends and forecasts, 1990-2020f 6 Figure 3:
Lithuania power production by fuel type, 1990-2008e 12 Figure 4: Lithuania
power production by fuel type, 2008e 13 Figure 5: Lithuania power sectoral
consumption, 2008e 14 Figure 6: Lithuania power consumption, trends and
forecasts, 1990-2020f 15 Figure 7: Lithuania power generation capacity by
fuel type, 2008 16 Figure 8: MCI Assessment Scale 18 Figure 9: MCI
Assessment Framework 19 Figure 10: MCI Scales 20 Figure 11: European
Gas Market Competitive Intensity, 2009-12 21 Figure 12: Gas Market
Competitive Intensity, Lithuania 22 Figure 13: European Power Market
Competitive Intensity, 2009-12 24 Figure 14: Power Market Competitive
Intensity, Lithuania 25 Figure 15: Market Competitive Intensity, Lithuania
28 Figure 16: Scale for MCI Assessment, Effectiveness of Regulator 32
Figure 17: Scale for MCI Assessment, Ease of Third Party Access 33 Figure
18: Scale for MCI Assessment, Pricing Regime 33 Figure 19: Scale for MCI
Assessment, Wholesale Market Fragmentation 34 Figure 20: Scale for MCI
Assessment, Retail Market Fragmentation 34 Figure 21: Scale for MCI
Assessment, Traded Market Maturity 35 Figure 22: Scale for MCI Assessment,
Access to Market Information 35 Figure 23: Scale for MCI Assessment,
Consumer Representation 36 Figure 24: Scale for MCI Assessment, Propensity
to Switch 36
|