RIS & PACS 2007: Market Size and Investment Potential, Digitalization in European Hospitals

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

• 1.1 Project Objectives
• 1.2 Methodology
• 1.3 Geographic Scope
• 1.4 Respondent Population & Data Reliability
• 1.5 Analysis
• 1.6 Report Structure

2. Executive Summary

• 2.1 Overview
• 2.2 RIS and PACS

3. Radiography in Healthcare Institutions

• 3.1 Availability of Radiography
• 3.2 Alternatives to In-house Radiography and Radiology Departments
• 3.3 Structure of Radiography in Healthcare Institutions

4. RIS and PACS

• 4.1 Installed Base
  • 4.1.1 Number of Installations
  • 4.1.2 Supplier Structure
  • 4.1.3 System Integration
  • 4.1.4 Archiving Solution
• 4.2 Future Investment Potential & Plans

5. Purchasing Process

• 5.1 Stakeholders in the Decision Making Process
• 5.2 Selection Process and Financing

6. Supplier Selection Criteria and Satisfaction

7. Appendices

• 7.1 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
• 7.2 Statistical Terms and Definitions
  • 7.2.1 Statistical Terms
  • 7.2.2 Topic Related Terminology

• Fig. 1-1 Target Sample Size - Market Quantification (Sample C), All Countries
• Fig. 1-2 Respondent Population by Project Step and by Target Segment, Czech Republic
• Fig. 3-1 Radiography in Healthcare Institutions by Type Number of Institutions
• Fig. 3-2 Alternatives to In-house Radiography and Radiology Departments Percentage of Institutions without Dedicated Radiology
• Fig. 3-3 Radiologists in Inpatient Healthcare Institutions by Type
• Fig. 3-4 Radiography Rooms Out- and Inside Radiology Departments
• Fig. 3-5 Radiography Rooms in Clinical Specialities by Type of Institution Number of Institutions and Mean Number of Rooms
• Fig. 4-1 RIS and PACS Installations Percentage and Number of Hospitals
• Fig. 4-2 RIS and PACS Installations by Segment Percentage of Hospitals with any Digital Systems
• Fig. 4-3 RIS Type - Stand-alone Solution vs. Part of Suite Number and Percentage of Installations
• Fig. 4-4 PACS Installations by Type and by Segment Percentage of Hospitals with any Digital Systems
• Fig. 4-5 Supplier Shares - RIS and PACS Installations Percentage and Number of Installations
• Fig. 4-6 Level of PACS Integration with Digital Equipment by Segment Percentage of Hospitals
• Fig. 4-7 Level of PACS Integration with Digital Equipment Number and Percentage of Hospitals
• Fig. 4-8 Level of Integration of Digital Equipment with PACS by Segment Percentage of Hospitals
• Fig. 4-9 Level of Integration of Digital Equipment with PACS Number and Percentage of Hospitals
• Fig. 4-10 RIS Integration with Digital Equipment by Segment Percentage of Hospitals
• Fig. 4-11 Level of RIS Integration with Digital Equipment Number and Percentage of Hospitals
• Fig. 4-12 Archiving Solutions Used with PACS Installations by Segment Percentage of Hospitals with PACS
• Fig. 4-13 Archiving Solutions for Short and Long Term Percentage of Hospitals with PACS
• Fig. 4-14 Investment Potential - RIS Percentage and Number of Hospitals
• Fig. 4-15 Investment Potential - PACS Percentage and Number of Hospitals
• Fig. 5-1 Differences in Decision Making Processes for Modalities and IT Percentage of Hospitals
• Fig. 5-2 Stakeholder Involvement by Phase of Decision Making Process Percentage of Hospitals
• Fig. 5-3 Stakeholder Influence in Group Decisions by Phase of Decision Making Process Mean Relative Weight in Percent
• Fig. 5-4 Supplier Selection Method Percentage of Hospitals
• Fig. 5-5 Financing Method Percentage of Hospitals
• Fig. 6-1 Supplier Selection Criteria Importance & Supplier Satisfaction Mean Rating, 1 to 5
• Fig. 6-2 Supplier Selection Criteria Importance Mean, Median and Range of Rating, 1 to 5
• Fig. 6-3 Supplier Selection Criteria Importance & Supplier Performance Mean Rating, 1 to 5
• Fig. 7-1 Schematic for Radiographic Imaging Equipment