Report: European PACS and PACS Professional and Technical Services Markets TOC

1. Executive Summary
- 1. Summary of the European PACS and PACS Professional and Technical Services Market
  - 1. Executive Summary
2. Glossary of Terms
- 1. Terms Used in this Research Service
  - 1. Abbreviations
3. Challenges Facing the European PACS and PACS Professional and Technical Services Markets
- 1. Challenges Facing the European PACS Markets
  - 1. Introduction
  - 2. Industry Challenges - Higher Impact
  - 3. Industry Challenges - Lower Impact
4. Market Engineering Research for the European PACS and PACS Professional and Technical Services Markets
- 1. Overview of the Total European PACS Market
  - 1. Market Overview - The PACS Concept
  - 2. Market Overview - Current Market Trends
  - 3. Analysis Assumptions
  - 4. Market Engineering Measurements
  - 5. Market Drivers - Higher Impact
    - a. Reduced Required Capital Outlay and Faster Return on Investment (ROI) Accelerates PACS Uptake
    - b. Technological Advancement Increases PACS Attractiveness
    - c. Greater Flexibility to Assemble Custom PACS Solutions Leads to Increased End-user Satisfaction
  - 6. Market Drivers - Lower Impact
    - a. IHE and DICOM Standardisation Widens Scope of PACS Projects
    - b. Increasing Complexity of PACS Projects Drives Comprehensive Technical Service Coverage
    - c. Advances in Medical Imaging Create PACS Replacement Market
    - d. The ASP Model Increases End-user Options for PACS Purchase and Implementation
    - e. Large-scale National PACS Projects Drive the Market for Training Services
  - 7. Market Restraints - Higher Impact
    - a. High Initial Capital Outlay and High PACS Running Costs Discourage End-users from Uptake
    - b. Personnel and Technological Issues Related to PACS Implementation Lead to Mutually Problematic Experience
    - c. High Profile National and Regional Purchasing Initiatives Cause Price Erosion and Risk for Vendors
    - d. Integration Projects not Always Highest on Hospital Priority List
  - 8. Market Restraints - Lower Impact
    - a. End-user Reluctance in Face of ASP Models for Data Storage Restrict Uptake
    - b. Limitations Associated with DICOM and HL7 Standardisation Prevent End-user from Receiving an Optimal Solution
    - c. Concerns over Data Security and Ownership Prove a Barrier to End-user Acceptance
    - d. The Complexities of Data Migration Deter End-users from Legacy PACS Replacement
  - 9. Revenue Forecasts
  - 10. Geographical Split
  - 11. Trends by Geographic Region - Part 1
  - 12. Trends by Geographic Region - Part 2
  - 13. Trends by Segment
  - 14. Technology Trends
  - 15. Competitive Structure
  - 16. Market Share Analysis
5. Market Engineering Strategy
- 1. Strategic Recommendations for the PACS and PACS Professional and Technical Services Markets in Europe
  - 1. Part 1
  - 2. Part 2
  - 3. Part 3
6. Frost & Sullivan Awards
- 1. Frost & Sullivan Awards for the European PACS and PACS Professional and Technical Services Markets
  - 1. Frost & Sullivan Awards for the European PACS and PACS Professional and Technical Services Markets
  - 2. Frost & Sullivan Growth Strategy Leadership Award
  - 3. Frost & Sullivan Competitive Strategy Leadership Award
  - 4. Frost & Sullivan Product Innovation Award
  - 5. Frost & Sullivan Customer Service Leadership Award
  - 6. Frost & Sullivan Customer Service Innovation Award
7. Database of Key Industry Participants
- 1. Companies Active in the PACS and PACS Professional and Technical Services Markets
  - 1. Market Participants
8. Decision Support Database
- 1. Government Healthcare Expenditure
  - 1. Government Healthcare Expenditure
- 2. Healthcare Expenditure as a Per cent of GDP
  - 1. Healthcare Expenditure as a Per cent of GDP
- 3. Private Healthcare Expenditure
  - 1. Private Healthcare Expenditure
- 4. Hospitals in Europe
  - 1. Hospitals in Europe
- 5. Hospital Beds in Europe
  - 1. Hospital Beds in Europe

European PACS and PACS Professional and Technical Services Markets

Table of Contents