Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1
- INTRODUCTION
- 1.1 What do we mean by quadruple play? .
- 1.2 Why are companies interested in offering a triple/quadruple play of
services?
- Figure 1.1: Change in figure access line numbers, 2000 to mid-2006
- Figure 1.2: Changing mobile penetration across leading mobile markets
- 1.3 How are different company types positioned?
- Figure 1.3: Typical operator portfolio expansion strategies
- 1.4 How advanced is the market?
- 1.5 Why are operators bothering with triple and quadruple play?
- 1.5.1 What are the potential risks?
- 1.5.2 Who stands to gain most from quadruple play and who is most at risk?
- 1.5.3 The mobile operators' dilemma
- 1.6 Countries and operators profiled
CHAPTER 2
- CHINA
- 2.1 Market background
- Figure 2.1: Telephone, mobile and broadband statistics for China
- Figure 2.2: Telephone, mobile and broadband penetration in China as
percentage of population
- 2.2 Quadruple play contenders
- Figure 2.3: Customer base comparison for China' mobile operators,
mid-2006
- Figure 2.4: Annualised ARPU comparison for China' mobile operators
- Figure 2.5: Data revenue comparison for China's mobile operators, 2005
- 2.3 Mobile operator strategies
- 2.3.1 China Mobile
- 2.3.2 China Unicom
- 2.3.3 China Telecom
- 2.3.4 China Netcom
- 2.4 Comparison of mobile operator approaches
- Figure 2.6: Comparison of leading mobile (and wireless) operator service
portfolios
CHAPTER 3
- CZECH REPUBLIC
- 3.1 Market background
- Figure 3.1: Telephone, mobile and broadband statistics for the Czech
Republic
- Figure 3.2: Telephone, mobile and broadband penetration in the Czech
Republic as a percentage of population
- 3.2 Quadruple play contenders
- Figure 3.3: Customer base comparison for the mobile operators in the
Czech Republic, mid-2006
- Figure 3.4: Annualised ARPU comparison for the Czech mobile operators
- 3.2.1 Significant others
- 3.3 Mobile operator strategies
- 3.3.1 Telefonica O2 Czech Republic
- 3.3.2 T-Mobile
- 3.3.3 Vodafone Czech Republic
- 3.4 Comparison of mobile operator approaches
- Figure 3.5: Positioning of mobile operators as understood in mid August
2006
CHAPTER 4
- FRANCE
- 4.1 Market background
- Table 4.1: Telephone, mobile and broadband statistics for France
- Figure 4.2: Telephone, mobile and broadband penetration in France as a
percentage of population
- 4.2 Quadruple play contenders
- Figure 4.3: Customer base comparison for France' mobile operators,
mid-2006
- Figure 4.4: Annualised ARPU comparison for France's mobile operators
- 4.2.1 Significant others
- 4.3 Mobile operator strategies
- 4.3.1 France Telecom/Orange
- 4.3.2 Bouygues Telecom
- 4.3.3 SFR
- 4.3.4 Neuf Cegetel
- 4.4 Comparison of mobile operator approaches
- Figure 4.5 : Positioning of mobile operators as understood in mid-August
2006
CHAPTER 5
- GERMANY
- 5.1 Market background
- Figure 5.1: Telephone, mobile and broadband statistics for Germany
- Figure 5.2: Telephone, mobile and broadband penetration in Germany as a
percentage of population
- 5.2 Quadruple play contenders
- Figure 5.3: Customer base comparison for Germany's mobile operators,
mid-2006
- Figure 5.4: Estimated annualised ARPU for Germany's mobile operators
- Figure 5.5: Estimated data as % of service revenue for Germany's mobile
operators
- 5.2.1 Significant others
- 5.3 Mobile operator strategies
- 5.3.1 E-Plus
- 5.3.2 Deutsche Telekom/T-Mobile
- 5.3.3 O2 Germany
- 5.3.4 Vodafone Germany
- 5.4 Comparison of mobile operator approaches
- Figure 5.6: Positioning of mobile operators as understood at end August
2006
CHAPTER 6
- ITALY
- 6.1 Market background
- Figure 6.1: Telephone, mobile and broadband statistics for Italy
- Figure 6.2: Telephone, mobile and broadband penetration in Italy as a
percentage of population
- 6.2 Quadruple play contenders
- Figure 6.3: Customer base comparison for Italy's mobile operators,
mid-2006
- Figure 6.4: Estimated annualised ARPU for Italy's mobile operators
- 6.2.1 Significant others
- 6.3 Mobile Operator strategies
- 6.3.1 Telecom Italia/TIM
- 6.3.2 Vodafone Italy
- 6.3.3 Wind
- 6.3.4 3 Italia
- 6.4 Comparison of mobile operator approaches
- Figure 6.5: Positioning of mobile operators as understood at end August
2006
CHAPTER 7
- JAPAN
- 7.1 Market background
- Figure 7.1: Telephone, mobile and broadband statistics for Japan
- Figure 7.2: Telephone, mobile and broadband penetration in Japan as a
percentage of population
- 7.2 Quadruple play contenders
- Figure 7.3: Customer base comparison for Japan's mobile operators,
mid-2006
- Figure 7.4: Estimated annualised ARPU for Japan's mobile operators
- Figure 7.5: Estimated data as % of service revenue for Japan's mobile
operators
- 7.2.1 Significant others
- 7.3 Mobile operator strategies
- 7.3.1 NTT/NTT DoCoMo
- 7.3.2 KDDI
- 7.3.3 Softbank Mobile
- 7.4 Comparison of mobile operator approaches
- Figure 7.6: Positioning of mobile operators as understood at end August
2006
CHAPTER 8
- KOREA
- 8.1 Market background
- Figure 8.1: Telephone, mobile and broadband statistics for Korea
- Figure 8.2: Telephone, mobile and broadband penetration in Korea as a
percentage of population
- 8.2 Quadruple play contenders
- Figure 8.3: Customer base comparison for Korea's mobile operators, 2005
and mid-2006
- Figure 8.4: Estimated annualised ARPU for Korea's mobile operators
- 8.2.1 Significant others
- 8.3 Mobile operator strategies
- 8.3.1 SK Telecom
- 8.3.2 LG Telecom
- 8.3.3 KTF
- 8.3.4 Korea Telecom
- 8.4 Comparison of mobile operator approaches
- Figure 8.5: Positioning of the mobile operators as understood at end
August 2006
CHAPTER 9
- POLAND
- 9.1 Market background
- Figure 9.1: Telephone, mobile and broadband statistics for Poland
- Figure 9.2: Telephone, mobile and broadband penetration in Poland as a
percentage of population
- 9.2 Quadruple play contenders
- Figure 9.3: Customer base comparison for Poland's mobile operators
- Figure 9.4: Estimated annualised ARPU for Poland's mobile operators
- 9.2.1 Significant others
- 9.3 Mobile operator strategies
- 9.3.1 Orange (formerly PTK Centertel)
- 9.3.2 Polkomtel
- 9.3.3 Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa
- 9.4 Comparison of mobile operator approaches
- Figure 9.5: Positioning of the mobile operators as understood at end
August 2006
CHAPTER 10
- SPAIN
- 10.1 Market background
- Figure 10.1: Telephone, mobile and broadband statistics for Spain
- Figure 10.2: Telephone, mobile and broadband penetration in Spain as a
percentage of population
- 10.2 Quadruple play contenders
- Figure 10.3: Customer base comparison for Spain's mobile operators in
mid-2006
- Figure 10.4: Estimated annualised ARPU for Spain's mobile operators
- Figure 10.5: Estimated percentage of service revenues from data
- 10.2.1 Significant others
- 10.3 Mobile operator strategies
- 10.3.1 Vodafone Spain
- 10.3.2 Amena/Orange
- 10.3.3 Telefonica/ Telefonica Moviles
- 10.4 Comparison of mobile operator approaches
- Figure 10.6: Positioning of the mobile operators as understood at end
August 2006
CHAPTER 11
- UNITED KINGDOM
- 11.1 Market background
- Figure 11.1: Telephone, mobile and broadband statistics for the UK
- Figure 11.2: Telephone, mobile and broadband penetration in the UK as a
percentage of population
- 11.2 Quadruple play contenders
- Figure 11.3: Customer base comparison for the UK's mobile operators,
mid-2006
- Figure 11.4: Estimated annualised ARPU for the UK's mobile operators
- Figure 11.5: Estimated percentage of service revenues from data
- 11.2.1 Significant others
- 11.3 Mobile operator and service provider strategies
- 11.3.1 Vodafone UK
- 11.3.2 O2
- 11.3.3 3 UK
- 11.3.4 Orange UK
- 11.3.5 NTL:Telewest/Virgin Mobile
- 11.3.6 T-Mobile
- 11.3.7 BT
- 11.4 Comparison of mobile operator approaches
- Figure 11.6: Positioning of the mobile operators and service providers
as understood at end August 2006
CHAPTER 12
- UNITED STATES
- 12.1 Market background
- Figure 12.1: Telephone, mobile and broadband statistics for the United
States
- Figure 12.2: Telephone, mobile and broadband penetration in the US as a
percentage of population
- 12.2 Quadruple play contenders
- Figure 12.3: Customer base comparison for the leading US mobile
operators, mid-2006
- Figure 12.4: Estimated annualised ARPU for the leading mobile operators
in the US
- Figure 12.5: Estimated percentage of service revenues from data
- 12.2.1 Significant others
- 12.3 Leading mobile operators' strategies
- 12.3.1 Cingular
- 12.3.2 Sprint Nextel
- 12.3.3 T-Mobile
- 12.3.4 Verizon Wireless
- 12.4 Comparison of the leading mobile operators' approaches
- Figure 12.6: Positioning of the leading mobile operators as understood
at end August 2006
|
Related Report
|