the-infoshop.com - The vertical markets research portal
View CartView Cart
Global Information, Inc.
US: +1-860-674-8796
EU: +32-2-535-7543
SG: +65-6223-2436
  Home | Category | Publishers | Custom Research | E-mail Alert | About Us | Contact Us | Site Map |
 

* View All Categories
View Conferences
Japanese Korean Chinese

Market Research Report

Mobile TV: End-user Opinion

Published by Informa Telecoms & Media Contact us : +1-860-674-8796
Published 2006/12 Content info  
Product code ITM47619
Price From  US $ 1798 Order/Price list
US $ 1798 Hard Copy
US $ 2696 PDF via Web Access (Single User License)
US $ 3596 PDF via Web Access (Single User License) & Hard Copy
Delivery Time
PDF by E-Mail
Approx. 1-2 business days
Hard Copy/CD-ROM
Approx. 3-4 business days
If you need expedited delivery, please call us.
Description TOC

Table of Contents

CHAPTER 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • Mobile TV fascinates consumers
  • Sentiment towards mobile TV grows negative
  • Mobile TV disappoints user expectations

Background and scope

  • Discussion classification scheme
    • Categorisation definitions
    • Content definition
    • Customer care definition
    • Ease of use definition
    • Marketing definition
    • Quality definition
    • Restrictions definition
    • Use-cases definition
  • Value for money definition
    • Other definition

Summary methodology and terminology

CHAPTER 2

ANALYSIS OF BUZZ: WHAT DO CONSUMERS TALK ABOUT?

  • Quality and ease of use dominate discussion
    • Figure 1.1: Overall buzz by topic of discussion
  • Buzz comparison 2005/2006: consumer interest in mobile TV growing strongly
    • Figure 1.2: Mobile TV overall buzz comparison, 2005-2006
  • Buzz sentiment comparison 2005-2006: negative sentiment outgrows positive
    • Figure 1.3: Buzz sentiment comparison, 2005-2006

CHAPTER 3

QUALITY: THE PRIMARY CONCERN FOR CONSUMERS

  • Quality: overall sentiment mixed
    • Figure 3.1: Quality buzz by sentiment
  • Comparison with 2005: quality perceptions declining
    • Figure 3.2: Quality sentiment comparison, 2005-2006
  • Quality buzz: image quality the main concern
    • Figure 3.3: Quality buzz by sub-topic of discussion
  • Quality sentiment: picture quality mixed, but small screens disliked
    • Figure 3.4: Quality buzz sentiment by sub-topic of discussion
  • Quality: sub-topics of discussion
    • Picture: mixed perceptions
      • Figure 3.5: Picture buzz by sentiment
    • Screen size: a perceptual barrier for some
      • Figure 3.6: Screen size buzz by sentiment
  • Audio: loss of synchronisation annoys
    • Figure 3.7: Audio buzz by sentiment
  • Reception: "bursty" network performance
    • Figure 3.8: Reception buzz by sentiment

CHAPTER 4

EASE OF USE: BUGS AND ERRORS COMPROMISE USABILITY

  • Ease of use: strongly negative sentiment
    • Figure. 4.1: Overall ease of use sentiment
  • Comparison with 2005: little improvement in sentiment
    • Figure 4.2: Ease of use sentiment comparison, 2005-2006
  • Ease of use buzz: bugs and errors dominate
    • Figure 4.3: Ease of use buzz by sub-topic of discussion
  • Ease of use sentiment: only navigation attracts positive discussion
    • Figure 4.4: Ease of use buzz sentiment by sub-topic
  • Ease of use: sub-topics of discussion
    • Bugs and errors: frequent problems taint service experience
      • Figure 4.5: Bugs and errors buzz by sentiment
    • Navigation: users like to ' channel hop'
      • Figure 4.6: Navigation buzz by sentiment
    • Battery life: preventing increased usage
      • Figure 4.7: Battery buzz by sentiment
    • Comfort: area of future concern?
      • Figure 4.8: Comfort buzz by sentiment

CHAPTER 5

USE-CASES: END USERS LOVE ' MOBILE' TV

  • Use-cases: overwhelming positive sentiment
    • Figure 5.1: Use-cases overall buzz by sentiment
  • Comparison with 2005: major improvements in perceptions
    • Figure 5.2: Use-cases sentiment comparison, 2005-2006
  • Use-case buzz: "where" used the focus of discussion
    • Figure 5.3: Use-cases buzz by sub-topic
  • Use-cases sentiment: seen as compelling concept
    • Figure 5.4: Use-cases buzz by sentiment and sub-topic
  • Use-cases: sub-topics of discussion
    • ' Where' : commuting seen as a key use-case
      • Figure 5.5: "Where" buzz by sentiment
    • ' Why' : users less clear on actual benefits
      • Figure 5.6: "Why" buzz by sentiment
    • ' When' : morning and evening commute are favourite
      • Figure 5.7: "When" buzz by sentiment
    • ' How long' : filling up dead time a key use
      • Figure 5.8: "How long" buzz by sentiment

CHAPTER 6

VALUE FOR MONEY: SERVICE EXPERIENCE HOLDS BACK VALUE PERCEPTIONS

  • Value for money: negative sentiment common
    • Figure 6.1: Value for money buzz by sentiment
  • Comparison with 2005: value perceptions becoming more negative
    • Figure 6.2: Value for money sentiment comparison, 2005-2006
  • Value for money buzz: subscription charges the focus of discussion
    • Figure 6.3: Value for money buzz by sub-topic
  • Value for money sentiment: bundles are well perceived
    • Figure 6.4: Value for money buzz by sentiment and sub-topic
  • Value for money: sub-topics of discussion
    • Subscription: seen as poor value tied to poor quality
      • Figure 6.5: Subscription buzz by sentiment
    • Bundles: users love to pick and chose their content
      • Figure 6.6: Bundle buzz by sentiment
    • General value for money: cost dissuades adoption for some
      • Figure 6.7: General value for money buzz by sentiment
    • Data usage: a concern for off-net providers
      • Figure 6.8: Data usage buzz by sentiment

CHAPTER 7

CONTENT: USERS LOVE IMPROVING RANGE OF CONTENT

  • Content: overall sentiment positive
    • Figure 7.1: Content buzz by sentiment
  • Comparison with 2005: positive sentiment growing
    • Figure 7.2: Content sentiment comparison, 2005-2006
  • Content buzz: improving range/choice the focus
    • Figure 7.3: Content buzz by sub-topic
  • Content sentiment: specific content well-liked
    • Figure 7.4: Contents buzz by sentiment and sub-topic
  • Content: sub-topics of discussion
    • Range/choice: users impressed by the channel variety
      • Figure 7.5: Range/choice buzz by sentiment
    • Specific content: sport content well liked
      • Figure 7.6: "Specific content" buzz by sentiment
    • Quality: poor content is poor content
      • Figure 7.7: ' Content quality; buzz by sentiment

CHAPTER 8

ANALYSIS BY COUNTRY

  • France: improved applications impact discussion
    • French buzz: improved ease of use drives discussion
      • Figure 8.1: France; buzz by topic
    • French sentiment: improved navigation partially offsets usability concerns
      • Figure 8.2: France; buzz by sentiment and topic
  • Germany: quality the focus of discussion
    • German buzz: little focus on content
      • Figure 8.3: Germany; buzz by topic
    • German sentiment: criticisms hold back use-case perception
      • Figure 8.4: Germany; buzz by topic and sentiment
  • UK: improved range of content improves value perceptions
    • UK buzz: content a growing topic, held back by quality
      • Figure 8.5: UK; buzz by topic
    • UK sentiment: positive perception of value and content
      • Figure 8.6: UK; buzz by topic and sentiment
  • US: quality impacts value perceptions
    • US buzz: quality the focus, usability less of an issue
      • Figure 8.7: US; buzz by topic
  • US sentiment: quality experience drives value complaints
    • Figure 8.8: US; buzz by topic and sentiment

CHAPTER 9

SUMMARY: THE MOST IMPORTANT AREAS TO CONSUMERS

  • Figure 9.1: Top five sub-categories by volume of buzz
  • Figure 9.2: Summary of key end-user issues by overall sentiment

APPENDIX: DETAILED METHODOLOGY

Related Report
Back to Top
Please inform me when related publications are released
InfoWatch

US: 1-860-674-8796 EU: 32-2-535-7543 SG: 65-6223-2436
The vertical markets research portal
© 2009, the-infoshop.com by Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.