Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1. INTRODUCTION
- 1.1. Where in the value chain?
- 1.1.1. Manufacture
- 1.1.2. Transport
- 1.1.3. Retail
- 1.1.4. Laundries
- 1.2. Choice of specification and frequency
- 1.3. Choice of system and system integrator
- 1.4. Privacy issues
- 1.5. User size
- 1.5.1. Largest companies
- 1.5.2. Mid range companies
- 1.6. Suppliers vs retailers
- 1.7. RFID value chain and profit
2. PAYBACKS
- 2.1. General situation
- 2.2. Item level potential is far greater than for any other form of RFID
- 2.3. Checklist of types of payback
3. SUPPLIER AND RESEARCHER PROFILES
- 3.1. ABS Laundry Business Solutions Netherlands
- 3.2. Adhtech Sweden
- 3.3. Alien Technology USA
- 3.4. Avery Dennison/ Paxar USA
- 3.5. BT Auto-ID UK
- 3.6. CETEMMSA Spain
- 3.7. Checkpoint Systems USA
- 3.8. Chinese University of Hong Kong China
- 3.9. Danby Group USA
- 3.10. Datamars Switzerland
- 3.11. Ducker UK/ Kannegiesser Germany
- 3.12. DVT Denmark
- 3.13. Dynatrac Systems Canada
- 3.14. EM Microelectronics Switzerland
- 3.15. Erum I&C Co Korea
- 3.16. Franwell USA
- 3.17. Fujitsu Japan
- 3.18. Gartner Transportteknik Germany
- 3.19. GCS Consulting Germany
- 3.20. GlobeRanger USA
- 3.21. Impinj USA
- 3.22. Infosys USA
- 3.23. Intellident UK
- 3.24. Jensen Denmark
- 3.25. Lab ID Italy
- 3.26. Laudis Systems USA/ China
- 3.27. Laundry Computer Technics Netherlands
- 3.28. Leading Information Technology Institute (LITI) Japan
- 3.29. Manchester University UK
- 3.30. Metalprogetti Italy
- 3.31. Microsoft USA
- 3.32. Motorola USA
- 3.33. NBG-ID France
- 3.34. NTT Comware Japan
- 3.35. NXP Netherlands
- 3.36. Positek RFID USA/Australia/ Norway
- 3.37. Pretide Technology Taiwan
- 3.38. Reva Systems USA
- 3.39. RFiT Solutions Austria
- 3.40. Rosendahl Digital Networks Finland
- 3.41. Roxtron Limited China
- 3.42. Salpomec/ UPM Raflatac/ Tyco ADT Finland
- 3.43. Securitag Assembly Group Taiwan
- 3.44. Shanghai Huayuan Electronic China
- 3.45. Shanghai Zangtian Electronic China
- 3.46. Siemens Business Services Germany
- 3.47. Simet Italy
- 3.48. Sokymat Automotive Germany
- 3.49. Steiner System USA
- 3.50. Synometrix Integrated Technologies Taiwan
- 3.51. Tagsys USA/ France
- 3.52. Texas Instruments USA
- 3.53. Texi AS Norway
- 3.54. Toppan Printing Japan
- 3.55. University of Arkansas USA
- 3.56. University of Parma Italy
- 3.57. VRF Holdings USA
- 3.58. Vue Technology USA
- 3.59. Walls Industries USA
- 3.60. Wincor Nixdorf Germany
- 3.61. Wipro Infotech India
- 3.62. X-ident/ Schreiner Germany
- 3.63. Zetes Industries Belgium
4. CASE STUDIES
- 4.1. Adler USA
- 4.2. American Apparel USA
- 4.3. Aokang Group China
- 4.4. Aoyama Trading Japan
- 4.5. Armani Italy
- 4.6. Atelier Sab Japan
- 4.7. Bailian Group China
- 4.8. Benetton Italy
- 4.9. Boboli Spain
- 4.10. Bultel International Fashion Group Germany
- 4.11. C&A Germany
- 4.12. Canadian Linen and Uniform Service Canada
- 4.13. Cannes Hospital Laundry France
- 4.14. Charles Vogele Switzerland
- 4.15. DHL Fashion Belgium
- 4.16. Dillards USA
- 4.17. Dolce and Gabbana Italy
- 4.18. El Corte Ingles Spain
- 4.19. Falabella Chile
- 4.20. fashionGroup RFID Germany
- 4.21. Fenland Laundry UK
- 4.22. Figleaves UK
- 4.23. Flandre Japan
- 4.24. Frandol Japan
- 4.25. Fruit of the Loom USA
- 4.26. Galeries Lafayette/ Echangeur France
- 4.27. Gardeur Germany
- 4.28. Gerry Weber Germany
- 4.29. Goldwin Sportswear Italy
- 4.30. Griva Italy
- 4.31. Hankyu Japan
- 4.32. Hellmann Meyer and Meyer Germany
- 4.33. Hennes &Mauritz H&M Sweden
- 4.34. Hong Kong Knitwear China
- 4.35. Initial Hokatex Netherlands
- 4.36. Isetan Shinjuku Japan
- 4.37. Jacadi/ Veronique Delachaux France
- 4.38. J Crew USA
- 4.39. Jones Apparel Group USA
- 4.40. Karstadt Germany
- 4.41. Kaufhof/Metro Germany
- 4.42. Kids Headquarters USA
- 4.43. Lauren Scott USA
- 4.44. LC Waikiki Turkey
- 4.45. Le Coq Sportif France
- 4.46. Lemmi Fashion Germany
- 4.47. Levi Strauss Mexico/ USA
- 4.48. LSCA USA
- 4.49. LIPS Netherlands
- 4.50. Long Deed Taiwan
- 4.51. Marks and Spencer UK
- 4.52. Marui Japan
- 4.53. Max Mara Italy
- 4.54. Mikuni Japan
- 4.55. Mitsukoshi Japan
- 4.56. Mi Tu Hong Kong China
- 4.57. Moku Moku Japan
- 4.58. Mustang Germany
- 4.59. New Balance USA
- 4.60. NP Collection/ Naisten Pukutehdas Finland
- 4.61. Onward Kashiyama Japan
- 4.62. Otto Versand Germany
- 4.63. Pantaloon India
- 4.64. Prada USA
- 4.65. Reno Germany
- 4.66. Russell Activewear USA
- 4.67. St Olavs Hospital Norway
- 4.68. Sanyo Shokai Japan
- 4.69. SRI Surgical Express USA
- 4.70. Star City Casino Australia
- 4.71. Sumikin Bussan Japan
- 4.72. Sumitex International Japan
- 4.73. Sumitomo Bussan Japan
- 4.74. Sungod Enterprise Group China
- 4.75. Takashimaya Department Stores Japan
- 4.76. Target USA
- 4.77. The Gap USA
- 4.78. Throttleman Portugal
- 4.79. Tokyo Shirt Japan
- 4.80. Tomorrow' s Mother USA/Canada
- 4.81. Trussardi Italy
- 4.82. Ueyama Orinomo Japan
- 4.83. VF Corporation USA
- 4.84. Wal-Mart/ Sam' s Club USA
- 4.85. Wave n' Wash USA
5. THE INTERNET OF THINGS - EPCGLOBAL VS U-CODE
6. MARKET SIZE AND FORECASTS
APPENDIX 1: GLOSSARY
APPENDIX 2: IDTECHEX PUBLICATIONS AND CONSULTANCY
TABLES
- 1.1. The projected unequal share of gain and cost of item level tagging
between certain Western retailers and their suppliers
- 2.1. Counterfeiting statistics
- 2.2. Payback parameters for item level RFID identified in various
rollouts, trials and studies
- 2.3. Examples of global potential for numbers of item level tags and
benefits by sector
- 4.1. RFID and barcode comparison
- 4.2. Comparison of NFC enabled devices and contactless smart cards.
- 5.2. Auto-ID Center MIT numbering scheme
- 6.2. Global tag numbers, price and total value of RFID on retail apparel,
including shoes, compared to total retail/ consumer goods value 2009-2019
- 6.3. Global market for systems excluding tags for RFID on apparel and for
all RFID in retail and consumer goods 2009-2019 $ millions
- 6.4. Systems including tags for RFID on apparel 2009-2019
- 6.5. Laundry/ rented apparel RFID tag manufacturers worldwide
- 6.6. Laundry/ rented apparel RFID tags sold globally by number, unit value
and gross value 2009-2019
FIGURES
- 1.1. Typical tagged garments in an industrial laundry
- 1.2. Recent major advances in HF RFID
- 1.3. Marks & Spencer customer information on RFID
- 1.4. Two sides of a woven RFID tag by Code Solutions Co
- 1.5. RFID Value Chain
- 1.6. Dynamics of RFID value chain
- 1.7. Position of RFID suppliers to certain sectors, following the
methodology of Boston Consulting Group.
- 3.1. An RFID chip encapsulated into a bundle of fibres
- 3.2. Laundry equipment incorporating RFID from Metalprogetti
- 3.3. The Battista 2000 System
- 3.4. Sharon Chen, CEO of Pretide Technology
- 3.5. TAGSYS Announces Its White RFID ' Button' Tag for Personal Garments
- 3.6. VRF Holdings' "Dynamic Markdown" tags
- 4.1. An RFID terminal in an apparel store in Einsatz Germany
- 4.2. ASK summary of DHL Fashion trial
- 4.3. NBG tunnel interrogator at DHL Fashion
- 4.4. NBG roving aisle interrogator at DHL Fashion
- 4.5. Swimwear from Figleaves UK
- 4.6. Garment from Gardeur
- 4.7. RFID swing tags on Gerry Weber shirts
- 4.8. Printing and application of Etimark RFID labels using Zebra
Technologies printer encoders by logistics operator Meyer and Meyer for Gerry
Weber.
- 4.9. Management information flow before the RFID system was installed at
Goldwin Sportswear
- 4.10. Management information flow using the new RFID system installed at
Goldwin Sportswear
- 4.11. Apparel sales management pilot test
- 4.12. RFID tagged apparel on moving racks being monitored by an Omron HF
interrogator in Metro trials
- 4.13. Use of combined RFID/EAS anti-theft interrogators at Galeria Kaufhof.
- 4.14. Children' s fashion from Lemmi Fashion in Germany
- 4.15. A passive tag (left) and a VIP card developed by Pretide Technology
for Long Deed
- 4.16. Apparel tags from Marks & Spencer in the UK
- 4.17. Marks & Spencer RFID flow diagram for item level RFID
- 4.18. Marks & Spencer prototype mobile scanner
- 4.19. Fashion from Max Mara in Italy
- 4.20. Virtual try on simulator
- 4.21. RFID UHF tag on clothes
- 4.22. Smart fitting room with touch LCD screen and intercom - the
interactive display recommending accessories
- 4.23. Intercom and intelligent database at shop counter
- 4.24. The goal was to RFID tag each manufactured garment at the factory
- 4.25. Onward Winter Collection 2008
- 4.26. Prada used a new RFID system developed by KTP
- 4.27. Staff device and ubiquitous display
- 4.28. RFID in St Olavs Hospital
- 4.29. Sanyo Shokai fashion
- 4.30. Japanese textile maker Sumitex International
- 4.31. Examples of contactless transactional media
- 4.32. Japanese train traveller paying for transport by resting a DoCoMo
RFID enabled phone on a terminal and receiving a receipt
- 4.33. Fashion from Throttleman in Portugal
- 4.34. Trussardi fashion 2008
- 5.1. EPCglobal EPC compared with UIC U-code today
- 5.2. The MIT Object Naming Service (ONS) ' tells computer systems where to
locate information on the Internet about any object that carries an EPC
(Electronic Product Code).
- 5.3. Left: Professor Ken Sakamura who supports U-code; Right: Professor
Jun Murai who supports EPCglobal in Japan
- 6.1. Global RFID market 2009-2019 $ million.
- 6.2. RFID market by application 2009-2019 in number of tags million - for
passive tags only
- 6.3. Global market for RFID 2009 -2019 in $ million - for passive tags only
- 6.4. Global RFID tag numbers, price and total value of RFID on retail
apparel, including shoes, compared to total retail/ consumer goods tag value
2009-2019
- 6.5. Global market for systems excluding tags for RFID on retail apparel
and for all RFID in retail and consumer goods 2009-2019 $ million
- 6.6. Systems including tags for RFID on retail apparel 2009-2019 $ million
- 6.7. Evolution of item level RFID by tag price showing earliest date of
mass adoption of leading application in each price band
|
Related Report
|
View Cart
