Chapter 1: Executive Summary of World Biotech Market, 2005
- 1.1 Abstract of Biotech, 2005
- 1.2 Aims, Scope and Format of Biotech, 2005
Chapter 2: Introduction to Biotechnology
- 2.1 What is Biotechnology?
- 2.2 The Uniqueness of Biopharmaceuticals: Turning Medicine Around
- 2.3 Biotechnologies Used and Their Applications to Pharma
- 2.3.1 Bioprocessing Technology
- 2.3.2 Monoclonal Antibodies
- 2.3.3 Recombinant DNA Technology
- 2.3.4 Cloning
- 2.3.4.1 Molecular Cloning
- 2.3.4.2 Cellular Cloning
- 2.3.4.3 Animal Cloning
- 2.3.4.4 Protein Engineering
- 2.4 The Future Biopharmaceutical Market
- 2.4.1 Biopharmaceutical 2004 Market Capatilisation Worth $311bn
- 2.4.2 Over 7000 Biotechnology Patents Granted Per Annum Since 1998
- 2.4.3 2004 Witnessed 54 New Biopharmaceuticals Approved by the FDA
- 2.4.4 Biopharmaceuticals Share 12.5% of 2004 Global Prescriptions
Chapter 3: Diseases Treated by Biopharmaceuticals
- 3.1 Biopharmaceuticals Are Versatile Agents
- 3.2 Orphan Diseases Are A Major Target of Biotech: 3 Out of 10 2004 Orphan Disease Drug Approvals Were
- Biopharmaceuticals
- 3.3 Overview of Major and Orphan Diseases Treated By Biopharmaceuticals, 2005
Chapter 4: Overview of Biopharmaceuticals Market, 2003-2004
- 4.1 Monoclonal Antibodies: Leading Class of Biopharmaceuticals in 2004 With Sales of $13bn
- 4.2 Biopharmceuticals by Therapy Class: Blood Disorders Share Over A Quarter of the 2004 Biopharmaceuticals Market
- 4.3 2004 Biopharmaceuticals Market Worth a Staggering $55.7bn
- 4.4 The Top 20 Selling Biopharma Drugs of 2004 Accounted For 62% of Total Revenues
- 4.5 The Top 3 Biopharmaceuticals Products of 2004 Sold Over $9bn
- 4.5.1 Procrit/Eprex - The Number One Biopharmaceutical Struggles at the Top
- 4.5.2 Risperdal Performs Well Thanks to New Delivery Technology
- 4.5.3 Epogen: The Third Best Selling BiopharmDrug of 2004
- 4.6 Santura: The Highest Earning Newcomer of 2004
Chapter 5: Company Revenues and Market Share, 2004
- 5.1 Amgen: The Reign Continues With A 17% Share of 2004 Market
- 5.1.1 Who Are Amgen?
- 5.2 Biotech Company Winners and Losers in 2004: Abbott, Sanofi-Aventis and Roche
- 5.3 BMS: The Best Company Newcomer of 2004
- 5.4 Biotech Companies Show High Growth Rates
Chapter 6: Biopharmaceutical Pipeline
- 6.1 Technology Driving Biopharma Pipeline
- 6.2 Biotech Targeting Chronic Illness
- 6.3 Arthritis Biopharmaceutical Pipeline, 2005
- 6.4 MS Biopharmaceutical Pipeline, 2005
- 6.5 Late-Stage Biopharmaceutical Oncology Pipeline, 2005
- 6.6 Late StageBiopharmaceutical Vaccine Pipeline, 2005
- 6.7 Blood Disorders Biopharmaceutical Pipeline, 2005
- 6.8 Late Stage Biopharmaceutical Endocrine Pipeline, 2005
- 6.9 Anti-Infectives Biopharmaceutical Pipeline, 2005
- 6.10 Enzyme Deficency Biopharmaceutical Pipeline, 2005
- 6.11 Late Stage Biopharmaceutical Opthalmic Pipeline, 2005
- 6.12 Late Stage Biopharmaceutical Other Pipeline, 2005
Chapter 7: Biopharmaceutical Market Forecast by Therapeutic Area, 2003-2010
- 7.1 Blood Disorders
- 7.2 Endocrine Disorders
- 7.3 Multiple Sclerosis
- 7.4 Oncology
- 7.5 Anti Infectives
- 7.6 Enzyme Deficiency Disorders
- 7.7 Vaccines
- 7.8 Arthritis
- 7.9 Opthalmics
- 7.10 Others
- 7.11 Biopharmaceutical Market Set To Almost Triple By 2010
Chapter 8: Summary of 2010 Biopharmaceuticals Market
- 8.1 Aransep: The Top Selling Biopharmaceutical of 2010 With Sales of $5.2bn
- 8.2 Blood Disorders Will Reamain Market Leaders
- 8.3 Ophthalmic Biopharmaceuticals: The Fastest Growing Therapeutic Class 2003-2010
- 8.4 By 2010 Biopharmaceuticals Will Account for Over 17% of All Drug Prescriptions
- Chapter 9: Introduction to Biogenerics
- 9.1 What are Biogenerics?
- 9.2 The Biogeneric Threat Looms Large
- 9.3 All Change in 2003: CDER to CBER
- 9.4 How are Approval Pathways Limiting the Development of Biogenerics?
- 9.5 Omnitrope Approved in Australia, Will Europe and the US Follow?
- 9.6 High Cost of Market Entry
- 9.7 Manufacturing Capacity Problems
- 9.8 Biopharma Vs Biogenerics: The Fight Continues
- 9.8.1 Bioequivalence or Biosimilarity?
- 9.9 Will the Benefits of Biogenerics be as Great as Anticipated?
- 9.10 How Imminent is the Threat from Biogeneric Competition?
Chapter 10: The Potential Biogeneric Market
- 10.1 $13bn of Biopharmaceuticals To Lose Patency Protection By 2007
- 10.2 Eleven Biopharmaceuticals to Face Patent Expiry by 2007
- 10.3 High-Revenue Generating Biopharmaceuticals Face Patent Expiry Before 2007
- 10.4 High-Profile Biopharmaceuticals With Patent Expirations Before 2007 Revenue Forecast, 2003-2010
- 10.5 Erythropoiteins Are Most At Risk To Biogeneric Competition
Chapter 11: Biopharmaceutical Market Challenges
- 11.1 BioTechs Delivery Challenge
- 11.1.1 Pulmonary Delivery: An Innovative Alternative to the Needle?
- 11.1.2 The Major Issues of the Pulmonary Pathway
- 11.1.3 Does Protein Formulation Affect Pulmonary Delivery?
- 11.1.4 Does Pulmonary Drug Delivery Have a Future?
- 11.1.5 Pegylated Forms Set to Revolutionise Delivery
- 11.1.6 Pegylation Can Extend Patencies! The Filgrastim Example
- 11.1.7 Transdermal Technologies
- 11.1.8 Microneedles for Transdermal Delivery of Vaccines
- 11.1.9 Nasal Delivery Is Demonstrating Promise
- 11.1.10 Moving Towards Pills? Altus Unique Technology
- 11.1.11 New Delivery Technologies: A Pharmacy or Medical Benefit?
- 11.1.12 Innovative Insulin Delivery Technology: The Race is On!
- 11.1.13 Numerous Potential Blockbusting NonInjected Insulins Set to Arrive 2005-2009
- 11.2 Manufacturing Capacity Shortfall
- 11.2.1 Why is There a Shortfall in Manufacturing Capacity for Biopharmaceuticals?
- 11.2.2 Make Vs. Buy: The 1980s BioIndustry
- 11.2.3 CMO Manufacturing Capacity was Adequate for the Supply of Clinical Materials Only
- 11.2.4 Late-Stage Products have absorbed CMO Clinical Manufacturing Capacity
- 11.2.5 How is the Manufacturing Capacity Shortfall Being Overcome?
- 11.2.6 Does The Future for Biopharmaceuitcal Manufacturing Lie with Transgenics?
- 11.3 The Cost of Biopharmaceuticals
- 11.3.1 The Top Five Biopharmaceuticals Each Cost at Least $10K Per Patient Per Annum
- 11.3.2 Monoclonal Antibodies and CSFs High Costs Reflect Production Difficulties
- 11.3.3 Yeast-Based Systems May Bring Down the Cost of Therapeutic Proteins in the Future
- 11.4 Acquiring Capital
- 11.4.1 Financing of Biotech Companies in 2003 Neared $17bn
- 11.5 Reliance Upon University/Company Collaborations
- 11.5.1 The Need For Collaboration
- 11.5.2 Biotechs Increasing Role of Commercialising University Research
- 11.5.3 Future Biotech Innovation Lies With Academia
- 11.5.4 The Risky Path from Bench to Market
- 11.5.5 Collaboration Strategies & Becoming the Partner of Choice
- 11.5.5.1 Objectives That Support Strategic Goals
- 11.5.5.2 Understanding the Value Brought to an Alliance
- 11.5.5.3 Identifying and Understanding Potential Partners
- 11.5.5.4 Due Diligence
- 11.5.5.5 Promoting Capabilities to Potential Partners
- 11.5.5.6 Maintaining a Relationship Through Structured Interactions
- 11.5.5.7 Gaining Competitive Advantage
- 11.5.5.8 Collaboration Management: Developing and Maintain A Deal
- 11.5.5.9 Strategic Goals to Consider
- 11.6 Regulatory Issues
- 11.6.1 Biopharmaceuticals and the FDA
- 11.6.2 FDA Improving Upon Biologics Approval Wait
- 11.7 Biogeneric Threat
- 11.8 Dependence upon Venture Capital Investment
- 11.9: Drivers and Restraints of Biopharmaceutical Market Growth
- 11.9.1 Drivers
- 11.9.2 Restraints
Chapter 12: Venture Capital Investment & Biotech
- 12.1 What is Venture Capital Investment?
- 12.2 What does VC Offer?
- 12.3 What Do Venture Capitalists Do?
- 12.4 Who Are Venture Capitalists?
- 12.4.1 Banks as Venture Capitalists
- 12.4.2 Business Angels (Wealthy Individuals) as Venture Capitalists
- 12.4.3 Corporate or Direct Investors as Venture Capitalists
- 12.4.4 Government Grants and Governments as Venture Capitalists
- 12.4.5 Venture Capital Firms
- 12.4.6 Other Types of Venture Capitalists
- 12.5 Why Do Biotech Companies Need VC Funding?
- 12.6 Venture Capital Investment in the US Biotech Market
- 12.6.1 US VC Investment Now Recovering Following Stockmarket Crash in 2000
- 12.6.2 329 US Biotech VC Investments Made in 2004, Providing Over $3.8bn
- 12.6.3 Synta Provides 2004s Largest US Investment Sum With $80m
- 12.6.4 MPM Capital 2004s Most Active US Biotech VC Firm
- 12.6.5 Company Expansion Stage is the Most Favourable for VC Investment
- 12.7 Increase in VC Funding of European Biotech
- 12.8 PE European Investments in Biotech Followed Similar Trends as in the US
- 12.9 European PE Biotech Investments are a Small part of the Funding Market
Chapter 13: The Global Biopharmaceutical Market by Region, 2003-2010
- 13.1 The World Biopharmaceutical Market is Dominated by the US
- 13.2 Both the Japanese and European Biotech World Market Share Set to Fall by 2010
13.3 The US Biotech Market Will Retain Its World Dominance
- 13.4 The European Biotech Market Will See Reduced Growth
- 13.5 European Biotech Industry Faces VC Funding Drop
- 13.6 Price Cuts in Japanese Biotech Market
- 13.7 Asia-Pacific Region: A Dormant Giant?
- 13.8 Biotech Industries in the Asia-Pacific Region are Growing Rapidly
- 13.9 China has the Most Biotech Companies in the Asia-Pacific region
- 13.10 Other World Markets
- 13.10.1 Russia Will See Growth in Biopharma Generics
- 13.10.2 Israel is and Area of Biotech Industry More than a Market for Biotech Drugs
Chapter 14: The Human Genome Project and Its Influence on the Biotech Industry
- 14.1 Applications and Future Developments of the HGP
Chapter 15: Conclusion: Big Pharma Must Invest into the Biotech Arena
- 15.1 Conclusion
|
Related Report
|