the-infoshop.com - The vertical markets research portal
View CartView Cart
Global Information, Inc.
US: +1-860-674-8796
EU: +32-2-535-7543
SG: +65-6223-2436
  Home | Category | Publishers | Custom Research | E-mail Alert | About Us | Contact Us | Site Map |
 

* View All Categories
View Conferences
Japanese Korean Chinese

Market Research Report

Convergence and Brand Management in Financial Services - US - November 2007

Published by Mintel International Group Ltd, Contact us : +1-860-674-8796
Published 2007/11 Content info  
Product code MT58152
Price From  US $ 3500 Order/Price list
US $ 3500 Hard Copy
US $ 3500 PDF by E-mail (Site License)
US $ 5000 PDF by E-mail (2 Site License)
Delivery Time
PDF by E-Mail
Approx. 1-2 business days
Hard Copy/CD-ROM
Approx. 3-4 business days
If you need expedited delivery, please call us.
Description TOC

Table of Contents

  • Scope and Themes
  • What you need to know
  • Scope of this report
  • Methodology
  • Abbreviations and terms
  • Abbreviations
  • Terms
  • Executive Summary
  • Limits of convergence
  • A jaded advertising audience
  • Perceptions of branding attributes
  • Battling for mindshare
  • Independent financial advisors
  • Investment preferences
  • How investable funds are categorized
  • Convergence and insurance
  • Convergence and telecom
  • Attitudes toward Financial Services Advertising: A Jaded Audience
  • It' s hard to score big with a disinterested crowd
    • Figure 1: Attitudes toward financial services advertising, by gender, September 2007
    • Figure 2: Attitudes toward financial services advertising, by age, September 2007
    • Figure 3: Attitudes toward financial services advertising, by household income, September 2007
    • Figure 4: Attitudes toward financial services advertising, by Hispanic/not Hispanic, September 2007
    • Figure 5: Attitudes toward financial services advertising, by student/no student, September 2007
    • Figure 6: Attitudes toward financial services advertising, by race, September 2007
  • Perceptions of Brand Attributes
  • Branding summary
  • The most honest, familiar, safe, and/or reliable companies
    • Figure 7: Rankings of financial companies described as "honest," "familiar", "safe", "reliable" and "no opinion", September 2007
  • The most unique, knowledgeable, expensive, and/or convenient companies
    • Figure 8: Rankings of financial companies described as "knowledgeable", "unique", "expensive", "convenient" or "none" or "no opinion" for all attributes, September 2007
  • Battling for Mindshare
  • Self-identification with the Outsider
  • Youth and the unconventional spirit
    • Figure 9: Self-identification with the unconventional, by age, September 2007
  • High rollers and the unconventional spirit
    • Figure 10: Self-identification with the unconventional, by household income, September 2007
    • Figure 11: Self-identification with the unconventional, by student/no student, September 2007
  • Case study: WaMu' s outsider branding strategy
    • Figure 12: Rankings of financial companies described as "unique," by age, September 2007
    • Figure 13: Rankings of financial companies described as "unique," by household income, September 2007
    • Figure 14: Rankings of financial companies described as "unique," by race/ethnicity, September 2007
    • Figure 15: Rankings of financial companies described as "unique," by student/no student, September 2007
    • Figure 16: Rankings of financial companies described as "unique," by region, September 2007
  • Sample advertising tapping into the ' outsider' spirit: Washington Mutual
    • Figure 17: WaMu print advertisement, August 2007
  • Honesty and Trust
    • Figure 18: Rankings of financial companies described as "honest," by region, September 2007
    • Figure 19: Rankings of financial companies described as "don' t know," by region, September 2007
  • The anxious crowd
    • Figure 20: Feelings of financial security, by gender, September 2007
    • Figure 21: Concern about identity theft, by gender, September 2007
  • Sample advertising targeted at the anxious crowd: State Farm
    • Figure 22: State Farm, September 2007
    • Figure 23: State Farm, September 2007
  • American lifestyles
    • Figure 24: Fitness and sports activities, by gender, September 2007
    • Figure 25: Leisure time activities, by gender, September 2007
  • Sample lifestyle advertising: Bank of America and Chase
    • Figure 26: Bank of America print advertisement, October 2007
    • Figure 27: Bank of America print advertisement, September 2007
    • Figure 28: Bank of America print advertisement, September 2007
    • Figure 29: Chase print advertisment, October 2007
    • Figure 30: Chase Print advertisement, August 2007
  • The Limits of Convergence
  • The dominance of the traditional model: preferred choices for savings and investment accounts
    • Figure 31: Preferred choices for savings and investment accounts, by gender, September 2007
    • Figure 32: Preferred choices for accounts, by income, September 2007
    • Figure 33: Preferred choices for accounts, by level of educational attainment, September 2007
  • The dominance of the traditional model: preferred choices for checking accounts
    • Figure 34: Propensity to follow traditional banking model, by gender, September 2007
    • Figure 35: Propensity to follow traditional banking model, by income, September 2007
    • Figure 36: Propensity to follow traditional banking model, by level of educational attainment, September 2007
    • Figure 37: Propensity to follow traditional banking model, by work status, September 2007
  • Trust issues and banks versus brokerage
    • Figure 38: Trust--banks versus brokerage firms, by gender, September 2007
    • Figure 39: Trust--banks versus brokerage firms, by age, September 2007
    • Figure 40: Trust--banks versus brokerage firms, by income level, September 2007
    • Figure 41: Trust--banks versus brokerage firms, by race, September 2007
    • Figure 42: Trust--banks versus brokerage firms, by level of educational attainment, September 2007
  • Is there any difference?
    • Figure 43: Perception of differentiation, by gender, September 2007
    • Figure 44: Perception of Differentiation, by income, September 2007
    • Figure 45: Perception of differentiation, by level of educational attainment, September 2007
    • Figure 46: Perception of differentiation, by work status, September 2007
  • Perceptions of Independent Financial Advisors
  • Independent financial advisors are not used by mainstream America
    • Figure 47: Independent advisors, usage, by gender, September 2007
    • Figure 48: independent advisor, usage, by income level, September 2007
    • Figure 49: Independent advisors, usage, by marital status, September 2007
    • Figure 50: Independent advisors, usage, by level of educational attainment, September 2007
    • Figure 51: Independent advisor, usage, by region, September 2007
  • Mainstream America not likely to trust independent advisors more than banks and brokerage
    • Figure 52: Trust, independent advisors versus banks and brokerage, by gender, September 2007
    • Figure 53: Trust, independent advisors versus banks and brokerage, by income level, September 2007
    • Figure 54: Trust, independent advisors versus banks and brokerage, by marital status, September 2007
    • Figure 55: Trust, independent advisors versus banks and brokerage, by level of educational attainment, September 2007
  • Where Do Consumers Like to Invest?
  • Their money?
    • Figure 56: Investment preferences, earnings, by gender, September 2007
    • Figure 57: Investment preferences, earnings, by age, September 2007
    • Figure 58: Investment preferences, earnings, by household income, September 2007
    • Figure 59: Investment preferences, earnings, by race, September 2007
    • Figure 60: Investment preferences, earnings, by level of educational attainment, September 2007
  • Their retirement savings?
    • Figure 61: Investment preferences, retirement savings, by gender, September 2007
    • Figure 62: Investment preferences, retirement savings, by age, September 2007
    • Figure 63: Investment preferences, retirement savings, by income, September 2007
    • Figure 64: Investment preferences, retirement savings, by race/ethnicity, September 2007
    • Figure 65: Investment preferences, retirement savings, by level of educational attainment, September 2007
    • Figure 66: Investment preference s, retirement savings, by employment status, September 2007
  • Their inheritance?
    • Figure 67: Preference for investing an inheritance, by gender, September 2007
    • Figure 68: Preference for investing an inheritance, by age, September 2007
    • Figure 69: Preference for investing an inheritance, by income, September 2007
    • Figure 70: Preference for investing an inheritance, by race, September 2007
    • Figure 71: Preference for investing an inheritance, by marital status, September 2007
    • Figure 72: Preference for investing an inheritance, by level of educational attainment, September 2007
  • Their lottery winnings?
    • Figure 73: Preference for investing lottery winnings, by income, September 2007
    • Figure 74: Preference for investing lottery winnings, by race/ethnicity, September 2007
    • Figure 75: Preference for investing lottery winnings, by level of educational attainment, September 2007
  • Appendix: Trade Associations
Related Report
Back to Top
Please inform me when related publications are released
InfoWatch

US: 1-860-674-8796 EU: 32-2-535-7543 SG: 65-6223-2436
The vertical markets research portal
© 2009, the-infoshop.com by Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.