Table of Contents
- Executive summary
- In a nutshell
- Ovum view
- Traffic management will become increasingly important
- QoS prioritisation provides a way to differentiate mobile broadband
service offerings
- Prioritisation will be used in conjunction with fair-usage policies to
control data-heavy users
- Application and service prioritisation opens up new business models
- Net neutrality questions will emerge
- Scope of research
- Prioritisation and QoS are high on operators' radars
- Numerous factors have led to recent interest in QoS prioritisation
- Extreme traffic growth
- Desire to manage heavy users
- Need to optimise use of network resources
- Ability to differentiate further on services and pricing structures
- Need to ensure specific applications or services function well
- QoS prioritisation still nascent among mobile operators
- Net neutrality will be an issue
- Use of lower-priority QoS in conjunction with fair-usage policies
- Five options to control usage once fair-usage limits reached
- Option 1: do nothing
- Option 2: throttling
- Option 3: additional charging
- Option 4: throttling with policy control
- Option 5: lower user priority
- Prioritising premium users with QoS packages
- Providing the best possible user experience
- Prioritising realtime traffic and applications based on QoS
- De-prioritising peer-to-peer
- Application or service prioritisation
- Operators' own services or applications
- Third-party services or applications
- Background services to fill up spare capacity
- Moving demand to different times or locations
- Service filtering, data compression and content adaption
- Data and service optimisation
- Disallowing or blocking services or content
- There are dangers with filtering content
List of Tables
- Table 1: Options for controlling heavy users
- Table 2: Possible Gold, Silver and Bronze mobile broadband package
structure
List of Figures
- Figure 1: Mobile data use in Hong Kong
- Figure 2: De-prioritisation of P2P traffic during time of congestion
|
Related Report
|