Table of Contents
- Executive summary
- In a nutshell
- Ovum view
- Beware the blinkers on physical management software
- Integration with virtualisation platforms is a work in progress
- Mobility blinds physical tools
- What to look for in virtual server management software
- Why buy more software?
- General requirements
- Some basic needs
- Automatic management
- Four fundamental functions for sprawl management
- Capacity planning
- Lifecycle management
- Patch management
- Chargeback
- The big three, in four fundamental functions
- A snapshot of four functions in Citrix, VMware and Microsoft' s tool suites
- Citrix
- Support for Microsoft and Citrix hypervisors, at low prices
- Capacity planning
- Lifecycle management
- Chargeback
- Patch management
- VMware
- A big VMware-only stack
- Capacity planning
- Patch management
- Lifecycle management
- Chargeback
- Microsoft
- Support for Microsoft and VMware hypervisors now, Citrix later
- Capacity planning
- Lifecycle management
- Patch management
- Chargeback
- Third-party suppliers
- Embotics for a wider definition of lifecycle management
- Lifecycle management
- Chargeback
- PlateSpin for capacity planning and lifecycle management
- Capacity planning
- Chargeback
- Vizioncore for lifecycle management, capacity planning and chargeback
- Lifecycle management
- Capacity planning
- Chargeback
- vKernel for capacity planning and chargeback
- Capacity planning
- Chargeback
List of Tables
- Table 1: A comparison of virtual server management tools
|
Related Report
|