1.0 Introduction 6
- 1.1 General 6
- 1.2 Need for CDPS 7
- 1.3 Why CDPS 7
- 1.4 Classification 8
- 1.5 Current View 9
- 1.5.1 History and Systems Examples 10
- 1.6 Scope 12
- 1.6.1 Methodology 13
- 1.6.2 Intended Audience 13
2.0 Government Initiatives 14
- 2.1 US 14
- 2.2 EU 14
- 2.3 Japan 16
3.0 CDPS Classifications 18
- 3.1 Functional Classification 18
- 3.1.1 Advisory Collision Avoidance Systems 18
- 3.1.2 Collision Warning Systems 18
- 3.1.3 Automated Crash Avoidance Systems 19
- 3.2 CDPS based on Crash Type 19
- 3.2.1 Single Vehicle Road Departure 19
- 3.2.2. Collisions at Intersections 20
- 3.3 Benefits 20
- 3.4 Issues 21
4.0 Technology 22
- 4.1 The CDPS Evolution Process 22
- 4.2 Technological Structure 23
- 4.2.1 Driving Environment Sensing Technology 23
- 4.3 RCDPS 24
- 4.3.1 Structures 25
- 4.3.2 Frequency Bands 25
- 4.3.3 Radar Versus Optics 27
- 4.3.4 Properties 27
- 4.1.3 Advances 29
- 4.1.4 Problems And Future Evolution Of the Driving Safety with RCDPS 31
- 4.2 CCDPS 32
- 4.2.1 Structures 32
- 4.2.1.1 Global Positioning Satellites 32
- 4.2.1.2 CCDPS Informative 33
- 4.2.1.3 Do not Disturb 34
- 4.2.1.4 What CCDPS Can Do 34
- 4.2.1.5 "Collective" Car 35
- 4.2.1.6 Navigation 36
5.0 Market 37
- 5.1 Market Drivers 37
- 5.1.1 OPEX and CAPEX Savings 37
- 5.1.2 Technological Factor 37
- 5.2 Market Specifics 37
- 5.3 Market Barriers and Issues 38
- 5.4 Market Forecast 39
- 5.4.1 Model Assumptions 39
- 5.4.2 CDPS Market Size Estimate 39
- 5.4.3 Market Segmentation 40
- 5.4.4 Sensitivity Analysis 41
6.0 CDPS Technical-Economical Characteristics: Summary 42
- 6.1 RCDPS 42
- 6.2 CCDPS 42
- 6.3 Pricing 43
7.0 Market Players 44
- Cambridge Consultants, Ltd 44
- DENSO 45
- Chrysler 45
- Continental 47
- Delphi Corporation 49
- Eaton Corp. 52
- Georgia Institute of Technology 53
- Hitachi 54
- Honda 55
- M/A Com - TYCO Electronics 56
- Mitsubishi 57
- RF Knapp 60
- Satellite Security Systems 61
- Toyota 62
- Valeo Raytheon 64
- Volfwagen 64
- Visteon 66
8.0 Conclusions 69 |
Related Report
|
View Cart
