Table of Contents
Executive Summary
- Background to postmarketing research
- Mandatory postmarketing trial requirements
- Phase IV trials for market development
- Impact of competitive pressures and pipeline strength on phase IV
trials
- Appropriate trial design
Chapter 1 - Background to postmarketing research
- Summary
- Introduction
- The clinical trial landscape
- Priorities and end-points in clinical development
- Safety and full market approval
- Health-economic arguments
- Life cycle management
- Product positioning and differentiation
Chapter 2 - Mandatory postmarketing trial requirements
- Summary
- FDA regulations for postmarketing trials
- Postmarketing commitment trials (PMC)
- Direct and indirect drivers for PMC conduct
- Indirect driver: Public health priorities
- Direct driver: Orphan drugs
- PMC Case Study: Iressa
- PMC Case study: Vioxx
- Postmarketing surveillance studies (PMS)
- PMS study drivers
- PMS design limitations
- FDA Amendment Act (FDAAA)
- Industry implications of FDAAA
- Public submission of datasets
- EMEA
- Terms of marketing approval agreement
- Joint FDA-EMEA drug monitoring initiatives
- Trials for improved clinical guidance
Chapter 3 - Phase IV trials for market development
- Summary
- Introduction
- Phase IV trials for formulary access
- US - the importance of comparative effectiveness
- EU - the importance of added therapeutic value
- Postmarketing trials for indication expansion
- The Rx to OTC switch
- Off-label physician use and risk management
- Product development for indication expansion
- Line extensions
- Case Study: Line extension launch profiles
- Case study: Zoloft (sertraline)
- Reformulations
- Follow-on compounds
- Phase IV trials for multiple indication expansion strategies
- Case study: Zyprexa
- Case study: Alimta (Pemetrexed)
- Enhanced market positioning
- Marketing regulations
- Head to Head trials
- Case study: Zyprexa vs Risperdal
- US Direct to Consumer (DTC) regulations
- EU marketing regulations
- Influence of sponsorship on trial endpoint
- Impact of budget constraints
- Big pharmaceutical firms
- Mid tier biopharma and biotechnology firms
- Big pharma' s scale advantage
- Case study: Novartis
- Case study: Glivec (Imatinib mesylate)
- Case study: Aclasta (zoledronic acid)
- Misuse of phase IV trials and regulator scrutiny
Chapter 4 - Impact of competitive pressures and pipeline strength on phase IV trials
- Summary
- The impact of competition
- Market scenario: Cardiovascular
- Market scenario: oncology
- Antineoplastics - market drivers for phase IV trials
Chapter 5 - Effective phase IV trial design
- Summary
- Introduction
- Endpoint designation and trial purpose
- Patient and physician recruitment
- Recruitment bottlenecks
- Design limitations
- Study design
- Data management and adaptive clinical trial designs
- Operational management
Chapter 6 - Appendix
- Primary research methodology
- Glossary
- Index
List of Figures
- Figure 2.1: Projected R&D spend by phase 2005-2009 ($bn),
- Figure 2.2: Postmarketing research and product lifecycle
- Figure 3.3: NDA and ANDA requirements for postmarketing status reports
- Figure 3.4: Biological product reporting requirements for postmarketing
status reports
- Figure 3.5: Sales of Iressa in the US, 2003-2007 ($m)
- Figure 3.6: Vioxx sales in the US, 2003-2004 ($m)
- Figure 3.7: Implication of FDA requirement of REMS
- Figure 3.8: Implications of tightened FDA policies
- Figure 4.9: Market drivers for postmarketing research
- Figure 4.10: Declining return on R&D investment (US, 1990-2004)
- Figure 4.11: Payor' s influence gain in prescribing decisions; US market,
share of voice, 2007
- Figure 4.12: Marketing and product development strategies using phase IV
trials
- Figure 4.13: Phase IV for product lifecycle management
- Figure 4.14: Sales summary for Zoloft in the US, 2000-2006
- Figure 4.15: Use of postmarketing trials for lifecycle management of
Zyprexa, US and EU5, 2000-2007($m)
- Figure 4.16: Effect of indication expansion on sales of Alimta in the US,
2004-2007 ($m)
- Figure 4.17: Big pharma phase IV trials by strategic purpose, USA,
1998-2007
- Figure 4.18: Number of phase IV trials by different ' Big pharma' companies
- Figure 5.19: Impact of market competition on phase IV trial design and
objective
- Figure 5.20: Global cardiovascular product pipeline, Q1 2008
- Figure 5.21: Diovan sales in the US, 1998-2007 ($m)
- Figure 5.22: Global cancer product pipeline, Q1 2008
- Figure 5.23: Number of phase IV trials vs sales growth, USA, 2003-2007
- Figure 6.24: Factors influencing successful Phase IV conduct
- Figure 6.25: Advantages and disadvantages posed by phase IV study designs
List of Tables
- Table 2.1: Phase IIIb vs Phase IV postmarketing studies
- Table 4.2: On-label indication expansion drivers
- Table 4.3: Declining incremental sales revenue return with subsequent line
extension launches
- Table 4.4: Zyprexa- Pivotal phase IV trials for indication expansion and
formulary access
- Table 4.5: Industry vs non-industry trial objectives
- Table 4.6: Trial characteristics by commissioning organization, 1998-2008*
- Table 6.1: Influence of study participation on subsequent drug prescribing
- Table 6.2: Advantages and disadvantages of using adaptive clinical trial
designs
|
Related Report
|