Table of Contents
Executive Summary
- Consumer attitudes
- Claims & corporate strategy
- Marketing strategy
- Product claims strategy
Chapter 1 - The impact of new legislation
- Summary
- Introduction
- The new legislation will have a dramatic effect on the marketing
landscape
- Overview of regulation # 1924/2006
- Introduction
- The creation of stronger, clearer regulation
- A “gold standard” approach is proving controversial
- Definitions and scope of the regulation
- Definition of “food”
- Definition of nutritional and health claims
- Medicinal claims are beyond the scope of this regulation
- Articles 13, 13.5 and 14 - the heart of the regulation
- Article 13
- Article 13.5
- Article 14
- Problems with the implementation of the regulation
- Communication breakdown? Dossier insufficiencies and related problems
- Interpretation of Article 13 and the “Gold Standard” approach
- A need within a defined population must also be shown for a health claim
- The costs of dossier compilation are harming innovation budgets
- Direct challenges to EFSA' s opinions are risky and ignore the wider
context
- Challenges the food and drinks industry must meet
- The future impact of the regulation
- Conclusions
- The rationalization, and not the death, of nutrition and health claims
- A narrow focus on the regulation will miss a vital piece of the
marketing puzzle
Chapter 2 - Consumer attitudes
- Summary
- Introduction
- A need to address the latest consumer trends affecting the market
- Addressing consumer issues can lead to major rewards
- A note on the following sections
- A major trust issue needs addressing
- Mistrust is the number 1 inhibitor of continued growth
- The majority of consumers still need convincing before they will buy
products
- An independent expert approving claims is crucial
- Functional foods are favored over other food technologies
- Clear benefits and low risk make functional foods more acceptable to
consumers
- The media and governments play a fundamental role in shaping consumers'
views
- Regulation and corporate practices need to build trust
- A lack of consumer control creates a clear need for regulation
- Consumer understanding needs to be improved
- Areas of misunderstanding
- Claims should be concise and clear to avoid confusion
- Deep-seated food attitudes affect the marketing landscape
- The process of food attitude formation
- Steps to determining attitudes and behaviors in a category
- “Natural” products must also fit in with these attitudes
- As a result, some ingredients are seen as more natural than others
- The carrier food for any ingredient is crucial
- A logical connection between the carrier and ingredient is required
- Staples, and products already seen as “healthy”, make the
best carriers
- Risk-Benefit assessments
- The prominence of “risk” in consumers' minds
- What are the risks on which consumers need assurances?
- Education about regulation can help provide reassurances
- Differences by consumer groups
- Attitude towards the product is the key
- Demographic factors to augment attitudinal segmentation
- Attitude-Behavior discrepancies
- Research needs taking into context - consumer research can be misleading
- Price and taste remain more important than claims
- Claims are important, but the “golden rules” cannot be
ignored
- Conclusions
- A tough recipe for success
Chapter 3 - Claims & corporate strategy
- Summary
- A need to update current strategies
- Health-orientated businesses should re-examine strategies
- Companies which simply wait upon EFSA' s decisions will fall behind
- It' s not just a case of “carrying on as usual” once a claim
has been approved
- Areas that should be strategically reassessed
- Decisions to challenge EFSA will harm companies and industry in the long
run
- Research & development needs to focus on clinical excellence and
“marketability”
- Product pipelines and portfolios should be reassessed
- Next steps in corporate strategy
- Avoid distractions associated with the new regulation
- Adopting a pharmaceutical-style model for health brands
- Developing a corporate health brand
- Case study: Danone, developing a corporate health brand
- New approaches in portfolio management
- All health brands in the market need to offer highly credible health
claims
- Research and development pipelines should be segmented by risk
- Where possible, make use of “stalking horses” when launching
new ingredients
Chapter 4 - Marketing strategy
- Summary
- Introduction
- The advantage will go to those who are quick to update their marketing
- A framework for marketing strategy
- Strategies can, and should, be based on consumer insight
- A tool for assessing products' consumer appeal
- Assessments of product appear should be based upon consumer insights
- Market analysis can also be layered on top of consumer appeal assessments
- Marketing strategy and tactics
- Make claims clear, specific and benefit-focused
- The temptation to continually add claims should be avoided
- Wellness positionings should also be avoided for specific products
- Market benefits first and provide the science as back up
- Naming specific ingredients is a powerful tool in marketing
communications
- Safety of products is a tricky issue
- Marketing should reassure consumers about safety
- Improving communications
- Commercializing science and educating consumers are key
- A flexible blueprint for global marketing is crucial
- Companies must take the lead in responsible communications
- The Natural Perspective
- Natural positioning should be used where possible
- Determining just what is “natural” is not an easy task
- Natural positionings must meet consumers' expectations as well as
regulation
- New “natural” sweeteners highlight the power of a natural
positioning
- Marketers will need to decide how overt to make any natural positioning
Chapter 5 - Product claims strategy
- Summary
- Introduction
- Scope of the chapter
- Analyzing the last year of new launches provides insight into latest
strategies
- Scope of the data
- Claims analysis
- Claims by type and by industry
- An average of 2.6 claims is made by a product making any claim
- Beverages focus on “positive” nutrition, but food focuses on
avoiding the “bads”
- Innovation is greater in North America and is more focused on positive
nutrition
- Why should positive nutrition be more popular in the US?
- Most popular claims by industry
- “High”, “low” and “no” positioning
still dominate
- The natural angle
- Natural positionings are of fundamental importance
- American products heavily focus on natural benefits
- Most popular functional claims by industry
- Most functional claims are not specific
- Functional claims are much more prevalent among North American launches
- Leading countries for new claims
- Leading manufacturers for new claims
- Private Labels are providing competition to brands
Chapter 6 - Appendix
List of Figures
- Figure 2.1: The top-down process of food attitude formation: a
hypothetical example from the yogurt category
- Figure 3.2: An initial framework for segmenting product development
portfolios by risk
- Figure 4.3: Framework for assessing product strengths and weaknesses
- Figure 4.4: Fewer, clearer claims make a product more, not less, compelling
- Figure 4.5: Pistachi Oats: The Heart Healthy Cookie. A credible product
proposition for European consumers?
- Figure 4.6: Actimel uses a consistent set of key messages to clearly and
succinctly explain product benefits
List of Tables
- Table 2.1: Percentage of European and US consumers who find health and
nutritional claims on food and drinks “trustworthy”, 2008
- Table 5.2: % share of different claims being used, by type, in North
America and Western Europe, in new product launches between April 2008 and
April 2009
- Table 5.3: % share of different claims being used, by type, in North
America and Western Europe, in new product launches between April 2008 and
April 2009
- Table 5.4: Most popular claims made by new product launches that feature
health or nutrition claims (% of products with any claim), by industry, in
North America and Western Europe, April 2008 to April 2009
- Table 5.5: Ranking of the most popular claims, overall and by industry,
for new product launches, in North America and Western Europe, April 2008 to
April 2009
- Table 5.6: Most popular claims made by new product launches that feature
health or nutrition claims (% of products with any claim), by industry, in
North America and Western Europe, April 2008 to April 2009
- Table 5.7: Percentage of new product launches that feature health or
nutrition claims which make a specific functional claim (% of products with
any claim), in North America and Western Europe, April 2008 to April 2009
- Table 5.8: Percentage of new product launches that feature health or
nutrition claims which make a specific functional claim (% of products with
any claim), by region, April 2008 to April 2009
- Table 5.9: Leading North American and Western European countries by the
number of new product launches featuring health and nutrition claims launched
between April 2008 April 2009
- Table 5.10: Leading manufacturers in North America and Western Europe,
based on new product launches that feature health and nutrition claims, April
2008 to April 2009
|
Related Report
|