Table of Contents
1. Overview 13
- 1.1 Statement of Report 13
- 1.2 About This Report 13
- 1.3 Scope of the Report 13
- 1.4 Objectives 13
- 1.5 Methodology 15
- 1.6 Executive Summary 16
2. Introduction: Companion Diagnostics in Drug Development 19
- 2.1 Companion Diagnostics as Biomarkers 20
- 2.1.1 Potential Benefits of Biomarkers as Companion Diagnostics 22
- 2.2 Biomarkers in Different Phases of Drug Development 22
- 2.2.1 Drug Discovery and Development Process 22
- 2.2.2 Biomarkers in Drug Development 24
- 2.3 Drug Targets 24
- 2.3.1 Target Discovery Using Functional Genomics 26
- 2.3.2 Functional Genomics 26
- 2.3.3 Target Validation 28
- 2.3.3.1 Target Discovery 28
- 2.3.3.2 Lead Identification 28
- 2.3.4 Target and Biomarker Discovery 29
- 2.3.4.1 Biomarker Validation 29
- 2.4 Biomarkers in Drug Discovery, Development and Clinical Diagnostics 29
- 2.4.1 Role of Biomarkers in Drug Discovery, Preclinical, Clinical
Development and Diagnostics 29
- 2.4.2 The Pipeline Problem 31
- 2.4.3 Biomarkers in the Drug Discovery Process 32
- 2.4.4 Segmentation of Biomarker Usage 32
- 2.4.5 Efficacy of Biomarkers as Surrogate Endpoints 33
- 2.4.6 Biomarkers Used to Reduce the Cost of Drug Development 34
- 2.4.7 Biomarkers: Challenges and Opportunities 34
- 2.4.8 Biomarkers in Early Safety and Toxicity Assessment 35
- 2.4.9 Biomarkers in Determining Validation Parameters 35
- 2.4.10 Challenges in Development of Biomarkers 36
- 2.4.11 Using Biomarkers in Early Clinical Development 36
- 2.4.12 Translational Biomarkers 36
- 2.4.13 Use of Biomarkers in "Go"/No-Go" Decisions 37
- 2.4.14 Diagnostic Tests 37
- 2.4.15 Biomarkers in Deal Making 37
- 2.4.16 Payors Use Biomarkers in Decision-Making 37
- 2.5 World Pharmaceutical Markets 38
- 2.5.1 World Market Summary 38
- 2.5.2 Company Performance in this Segment 40
- 2.5.3 Forces Affecting the Structure of the Pharmaceutical Industry 41
- 2.5.3.1 Threats 41
- 2.5.3.2 Competitive Forces 42
- 2.6.1 Industry Overview 42
- 2.6.1.1 Pharmaceutical Industry Drug Pipeline 44
- 2.6.1.2 Asia-Pacific to Replace United States and Europe as
Pharmaceutical Industry Center 54
- 2.6.1.3 The Changing Pharmaceutical Business Model 54
- 2.6.2 Benefits for Companion Diagnostic Tests in Drug Development 55
- 2.6.3 Strategies for the Creation of Partnerships - Predicting and
Overcoming Challenges in Creating Drug Response Profiling Diagnostics 57
- 2.6.4 Options and Applications 57
- 2.6.4.1 Clinical Applications of Genomics: The Use of Evidence Based
Frameworks by Decision-Makers 57
- 2.6.5 Challenges, Drivers and Trends 58
- 2.6.5.1 Macro Trends in Biomarkers 58
- 2.6.5.2 Biomarkers: Industry SWOT Analysis 61
- 2.6.6 Breakaway Technologies 62
- 2.6.7 Collaboration for Companion Diagnostics 63
- 2.6.8 Key Stake Holders in Companion Diagnostics 63
- 2.9 Future Developments 65
3. Biomarker Development Tools 66
- 3.1 New Technologies in Functional Genomics 66
- 3.1.1 Genomics-Derived Drug Pipeline 66
- 3.1.2 Future of Genomics Technologies for Drug Target Identification 66
- 3.2 Overview of Microarrays 67
- 3.2.1 General Theory of Microarrays 68
- 3.2.2 GeneChip Probe Array Technology 69
- 3.2.3 DNA Microarrays 69
- 3.2.3.1 DNA Microarray Market Size 71
- 3.2.3.2 DNA Microarrays in SNP Analysis 72
- 3.2.3.3 DNA Microarrays in Cancer 72
- 3.2.4 Protein Microarrays 73
- 3.2.4.1 Reasons Why Researchers Use Protein Microarrays 74
- 3.2.4.2 Factors for Adoption of Protein Microarrays Technology 74
- 3.2.4.3 Future Innovations in Protein Microarray Technology 74
- 3.2.5 New Technologies 75
- 3.2.5.1 Antibody Microarrays 75
- 3.2.5.2 Peptide Microarrays 75
- 3.2.5.3 Peptide MHC Microarrays 75
- 3.2.5.4 Tissue Microarrays 75
- 3.2.5.5 Key Points for Developing Microarray Based Applications 76
- 3.2.5.6 Reasons Why Researchers use DNA Microarrays 77
- 3.2.5.7 Factors for Difficulties Applying DNA Microarrays Technology 77
- 3.2.5.8 Emerging Microarray Trends 78
- 3.2.5.9 Emerging Microarray Applications 78
- 3.2.5.10 Key Findings on Use of Microarrays 79
- 3.2.5.11 Advantages and Drivers of Microarrays 79
- 3.2.5.12 Limitations and Barriers to Use of Microarrays 81
- 3.2.5.13 qRT-PCR Use in Biomarker Identification and Drug Development
83
- 3.2.5.14 Microarray Quality Control (MAQC) Project 84
- 3.3 Theranostics 84
- 3.3.1 Theranostics in Drug Development 84
- 3.3.2 Trends in Theranostics 85
- 3.3.3 Timeline for Impact on Various Segments in Theranostics 85
- 3.3.4 Challenges for Biomarker Based Therapeutics Development 87
- 3.4 Pharmaceutical Development and Bioanalytical Services 88
- 3.4.1 Wyeth Singulex' s Erenna 88
- 3.5 Metabolomics in Drug Discovery 88
- 3.6 Bioinformatics 90
- 3.6.1 Definition and Role of Bioinformatics 90
- 3.6.2 Bioinformatics Sector Overview 93
- 3.6.3 Future Status of Bioinformatics 93
- 3.6.3.1 Future in Drug Discovery 93
- 3.6.3.2 Mergers and Acquisitions Could Deter Bioinformatics Growth 94
- 3.6.3.3 Barriers to Bioinformatics Growth 94
- 3.6.3.4 Types of Data and Bioinformatics Applications 94
- 3.6.3.5 Validated Core Modeling Technology 95
- 3.6.3.6 Applicability of Bioinformatics for Biomarker Discovery 95
- 3.6.3.7 Biomarker Data Management Compliant with Industry Standards 96
- 3.6.3.8 Data Management for Biomarkers 96
- 3.6.3.8.1 Data Transformation for Biomarker Development 96
- 3.6.3.8.2 Biomarker Data Collaboration 96
- 3.6.3.8.3 Interface for Online Data Sources for Genomic Structures 96
- 3.6.3.8.4 Target Markets for Informatics Software 96
- 3.6.3.8.5 Bioinformatics Drivers and Challenges in the
Pharmaceutical Industry 97
- 3.6.3.8.6 Products of Bioinformatics 100
- 3.6.3.8.7 Informatics Tools and Functionalities 101
- 3.6.3.8.8 Bioinformatics in Lead Identification and Optimization 101
- 3.6.3.8.9 Bioinformatics in Drug Development and Formulation 102
- 3.6.3.8.10 Role of Bioinformatics in the Drug Discovery Value Chain
102
- 3.6.3.8.11 Bioinformatics Software for Drug Discovery and Biomarker
Development 102
- 3.6.3.8.12 Bioinformatics Services 104
- 3.7 Biomarkers and Proteomics 105
- 3.7.1 Scientific Background 105
- 3.7.2 Applying Proteomics to Biomarker Discovery 106
- 3.7.2.1 Challenges Facing Biomarker Developers 106
- 3.7.3 Limitations of Proteomic Approaches to Biomarker Discovery 108
- 3.7.4 Validation of Biomarkers Using LC-MS/MS Systems 109
- 3.7.5 Use of Mass Spectrometry in Biomarker Discovery 109
- 3.7.5.1 Multiple Reaction Monitoring Assays (MRMs) 110
- 3.7.5.2 Gel-based Approaches 110
- 3.7.5.3 Non-Gel-based Approaches 111
- 3.7.5.4 SELDI-TOF MS 111
- 3.7.5.5 SELDI and Prognosis 112
- 3.7.5.6 SELDI and Treatment Monitoring 112
- 3.7.5.7 Limitations of Mass Spectroscopy 112
- 3.7.6 Partnerships for Developing Proteomic Biomarkers 114
- 3.7.7 Proteomics in Developing a New Cancer Marker 114
- 3.7.7.1 Translating Proteomic Oncology Discoveries to the Clinic:
Development of Analytical Reference Materials, Reagents, Data, and
Technology Assessment and Validation 115
- 3.7.7.2 Challenges of Discovering and Validating Clinical Protein
Biomarkers 115
- 3.7.7.3 Importance of Proteomics in Biomarker Discovery 115
- 3.8 Toxicogenomics 115
- 3.8.1 Toxicogenomics Concerns in Drug Safety Data 116
- 3.8.2 Toxicogenomics and Prioritization of Drug Candidates 116
- 3.8.3 Genomic Biomarkers for Drug-Induced Nephrotoxicity 117
- 3.8.4 Use of Biomarkers of Drug-Induced Cardiotoxicity 117
- 3.8.5 Use of Biomarkers of Drug-induced Hepatotoxicity 117
- 3.8.6 Transgenic Biomarkers for Adverse Drug-Drug Interactions 117
- 3.8.7 Challenges to Toxicogenomics 118
- 3.8.8 The Future Use of Toxicogenomics in Drug Discovery 118
4. Market for Biomarkers in Drug Development 119
- 4.1 C-KIT (CD117) Expression 122
- 4.2 CCR5 -Chemokine C-C Motif Receptor 122
- 4.3 CYP2C19 Variants 123
- 4.4 CYP2C9 Variants 123
- 4.5 CYP2D6 Variants 124
- 4.6 CYP2D6 Variants with Alternate Context 124
- 4.7 Clinical Biomarkers 124
- 4.8 Targeting Kidney Toxicity 125
- 4.8.1 Proximal and Distal Tubular Injury (alpha-GST & Pi-GST) 125
- 4.8.2 Collecting Duct and Loop of Henle Injury (RPA-1 and RPA-2) 126
- 4.8.3 Glomerular Injury (Collagen IV) 126
- 4.8.4 KIM-1 126
- 4.9 Targeting Hepatotoxicity 127
- 4.9.1 Breast Cancer 128
- 4.9.2 Colorectal Cancer 128
- 4.9.3 Prostate Cancer 128
- 4.9.4 Cystic Fibrosis 128
- 4.10 Biomarker Application in Oncology Clinical Development 128
- 4.10.1 Specific Example of Companion Biomarkers in Clinical Oncology 135
- 4.10.2 Integration of a Companion Diagnostic Strategy into Oncology Drug
Development 135
- 4.10.2.1 Lilly to Co-Develop Companion IVDs for Cancer Drugs 135
- 4.10.2.2 Celera to Work on Companion Diagnostics for Merck Cancer
Drugs 136
- 4.10.2.3 BioMerieux to Develop Companion Test for Ipsen' s New Breast
Cancer Drug 136
- 4.10.2.4 Perlegen and Roche' s 454 Develop Companion Tests 136
- 4.10.2.5 Ventana Medical Systems and the Critical Path Institute 136
- 4.10.2.6 Biomarkers in Recentin/AZD 2171 Development 136
- 4.10.2.7 Biomarkers in Development of Iressa 136
- 4.10.2.8 Epigenomics' Methylation Biomarker Septin 136
- 4.11 Targeting Diabetes Related Heart Disease 137
- 4.12 Key Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Targeted Therapeutics
137
5. Imaging Biomarkers in Drug Discovery 138
- 5.1 Introduction 138
- 5.1.1 Validation of Imaging Biomarkers 138
- 5.1.2 Types of Imaging Used in Drug Development 138
- 5.1.3 Development of Imaging Technologies 139
- 5.2 Molecular Imaging 139
- 5.2.1 Use in Drug Discovery 139
- 5.2.2 Use in Clinical Applications 139
- 5.2.3 Use in Clinical Trials 139
- 5.2.4 Cell-based Screening Technologies in Drug Development 139
- 5.2.5 Optical Biomarkers 140
- 5.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging 140
- 5.4 Positron Emission Tomography 140
- 5.5 FDG-PET Patient Phase I Studies 141
- 5.6 Imaging Biomarkers as Study Endpoints 142
- 5.6.1 Oncology 142
- 5.6.2 Parkinson' s Disease 142
- 5.6.3 Cardiac Disease 142
- 5.7 IT Solutions for Imaging Biomarkers in Biopharmaceutical Research and
Development 144
6. Clinical Biomarkers Improving Trial Design 145
- 6.1 Strategies to Improve the Measurement of Biomarkers for Drug Trials 145
- 6.2 Key Opportunities in Biomarker Discovery, Development and
Commercialization 145
- 6.2.1 Contract Research Companies 145
- 6.3 What Strategies Help Translate Biomarkers from Preclinical to Clinical
Development? 147
- 6.4 How Should Biomarker Data Be Compared to "Traditional" Safety and
Efficacy Data? 147
7. Biomarkers as Surrogate Endpoints 148
- 7.1 What is a Surrogate Endpoint? 148
- 7.2 Benefits and Drawbacks of Surrogate Endpoints 148
- 7.2.1 Benefits 148
- 7.2.2 Drawbacks 148
- 7.3 Improving the Efficacy of Clinical Surrogate End Points Using
Biomarkers 148
- 7.4 Surrogate Endpoint Validation 149
- 7.5 Effective Use of Surrogates 149
- 7.5.1 FDG-PET as a Surrogate Endpoint in Oncology Studies 149
- 7.6 Conclusions 149
8. Market Size, Collaborations and Future Directions for Companion Diagnostics in Drug Development 150
- 8.1 Strategies to Improve the Measurement of Biomarkers for Drug Trials 150
- 8.1.1 Key Opportunities in Biomarker Discovery, Development and
Commercialization 150
- 8.1.2 The Rationale Behind Biomarker Strategy 150
- 8.1.3 New Development Strategies and Their Implications for Deal Making
151
- 8.1.4 How Biomarkers Are Being Used To Reduce Attrition in Development
151
- 8.1.5 Combined Therapeutics and Diagnostics Biomarker Business Makes
Sense 152
- 8.1.6 Use of Biomarkers In House or Partner with a Diagnostics Company
152
- 8.2 What is the Best Balance of Resources to Have the Most Efficient
Pathway to Develop Biomarkers? 152
- 8.3 Current and Future Trends in Drug Development 152
- 8.4 Future Role of Biomarkers in Healthcare 153
- 8.5 What are the Current Organizational Obstacles in Biomarker
Implementation? 154
9. Regulatory Issues for Biomarkers in Drug Development 155
- 9.1 Introduction 155
- 9.1.1 Role of Regulatory Agencies in Development of Biomarkers 156
- 9.2 FDA Perspective of Biomarkers in Clinical Trials 156
- 9.2.1 FDA as a Gatekeeper of Companion Biomarkers 156
- 9.2.2 FDA Criteria for a Valid Biomarker 157
- 9.2.3 FDA Product Submission and Review Process 158
- 9.2.4 FDA Pipeline for Biomarker Tests 158
- 9.2.5 Adaptive Clinical Trial Design 159
- 9.2.6 Orphan Drug Act and Biomarkers: Options and Opportunities 159
- 9.3 Role of StaRT-PCR"! in Increasing Value of Pharmacogenomic Data 160
- 9.4 Supporting IND, NDA, and BLA Submissions 161
- 9.5 Performance Characteristics of Biomarker Tools 163
- 9.6 Biomarker Initiative and VGDs 164
- 9.7 Biomarker Qualification Pilot Process at the FDA 165
- 9.7.1 Introduction 165
- 9.7.2 Biomarker is Validity 166
- 9.7.3 Biomarker Qualification Process Map 166
- 9.7.4 Biomarker Qualification Pilot Process 166
- 9.7.5 The Pipeline Problem 168
- 9.7.6 FDA Critical Path 169
- 9.7.6.1 Challenge and Opportunity on the Critical Path to New Medical
Products 170
- 9.7.6.2 The NIH Roadmap 171
- 9.7.6.3 Predictive Safety Testing Consortium 171
- 9.7.7 Negotiating the Critical Path 171
- 9.7.8 Technical Dimensions along the Critical Path 172
- 9.7.9 Product Development Toolkit 173
- 9.7.10 Tools for Assessing Safety 174
- 9.7.11 Tools for Demonstrating Medical Utility 176
- 9.7.12 Tools for Manufacturing 179
- 9.7.13 Orphan Products Grant Program 179
- 9.7.14 Slowdown in New Medical Products 180
- 9.7.15 Factors Contributing to the Decline in New Product Applications
182
- 9.7.16 Factors that Cause Unnecessary Delays in New Product Approvals 184
- 9.7.17 Reducing Avoidable Delays in Time to Approval 186
- 9.7.18 Reducing Delays in Medical Device Reviews 187
- 9.7.19 Reducing Delays in Animal Drug Reviews 187
- 9.7.20 Quality Systems Approach to Medical Product Review 187
- 9.7.20.1 Instituting Quality Systems in Review of New Drugs and
Biologics 188
- 9.7.20.2 Implementing of the Common Technical Document (CTD) and the
electronic CTD 189
- 9.7.20.3 Implementing Medical Device Quality Initiatives 189
- 9.7.21 Case Study: Nephrotoxicity Biomarkers 189
- 9.7.22 Role of the FDA 189
- 9.8 CMS Regulatory Responsibilities 190
- 9.9 Role of National Institute of Standards and Technology in Validation
of Biomarkers 191
- 9.10 Biomarkers and FDA' s Voluntary Genomic Data Submission 191
- 9.11 Federal Health Oncology Biomarker Qualification Initiative 193
- 9.12 Orphan Drug Act and Pharmacogenomics: Options and Opportunities 194
- 9.13 Post-market Covigilance Programs 195
- 9.14 Technology Options, Potential Diagnostic Partners and Regulatory
Hurdles 196
- 9.15 What Regulatory Guidance Is Needed for Companion Biomarkers? 197
- 9.16 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) 198
- 9.17 IRB Approval in Clinical Trials 198
10. Business Decisions Using Companion Biomarkers in Drug Development 199
- 10.1 Advantages of a Pharmacogenomic Assessment of Biomarkers to Determine
Clinical Dose 199
- 10.2 Key Opportunities in Biomarker Discovery, Development and
Commercialization 199
- 10.3 What Are the Current Obstacles in Biomarker Implementation? 199
- 10.4 How Do Business Strategies, Such as Those Relating to Acquisition,
Drive Biomarker Strategies? 200
- 10.5 What is the Right Balance Between Using External Partnerships and
Developing Internal Infrastructure? 200
- 10.6 How Might Novel Biomarker Development Lead to Acquisition Strategies
and Their Implications For Deal Making? 200
- 10.7 Which Types of Biomarkers Should Be Developed at Various Stages in
the Drug Pipeline? 200
- 10.8 What Strategies Help Translate Biomarkers From Preclinical to
Clinical Development? 200
- 10.9 In What Class of Drugs Is the Value of Using Biomarkers in Decision
Making the Highest? 201
- 10.10 Increased Clinical Trial Costs in Targeted Phase I Trials 202
- 10.11 How Can Big Pharma Co-develop Biomarkers in a Cost-sharing Model for
Regulatory Acceptance? 202
- 10.12 How Are Biomarkers Being Used to Reduce the Attrition Rate in Drug
Development? 202
- 10.13 How Is ROI Measured Using Biomarkers in Drug Development? 202
- 10.14 How Might Organizational Structures Limit the Use of Biomarkers in
Drug Development and How Should R&D Organizations Address This Problem? 202
- 10.15 How to Maximize Business Development through Biomarker Strategies 203
- 10.16 What Is the Best Type of Business Model for Developing Biomarkers?
203
- 10.17 What Are Organizational Impediments Limiting the Use of Biomarkers
in Drug Development? 203
- 10.18 What Are Internal Capabilities for Novel Biomarker Development and
Application? 203
- 10.19 How Can Key Biomarker Technical Expertise Be Applied Across a
Complex and Highly-Stratified R&D Value Chain? 204
- 10.20 At What Stage of Drug Development Have Biomarkers Provided the Most
Benefit? 204
- 10.21 What Companies Are the most Innovative in Development of Biomarkers?
204
- 10.22 Best Values for Biomarkers in Drug Development and in Diagnostics 204
- 10.23 Companion Biomarkers Can Increase Value in an Associated Drug 205
11. Company Profiles 206
- 11.1 Abbott Laboratories 206
- 11.2 Accelrys 207
- 11.3 Affymetrix 208
- 11.4 Agilent Technologies 211
- 11.5 Amgen 213
- 11.6 Ananomouse 214
- 11.7 Applied Maths 215
- 11.8 Ariadne Genomics 215
- 11.9 ArrayIt (Integrated Media Holdings) 215
- 11.10 AstraZeneca 216
- 11.11 AutoGenomics 217
- 11.12 Axontologic 217
- 11.13 Beckman Coulter 218
- 11.14 BD 224
- 11.15 Bender MedSystems 225
- 11.16 Bioalma 225
- 11.17 BioAnalytics Group 226
- 11.18 BioCat GmbH 226
- 11.19 Biocept 226
- 11.20 BioChain 226
- 11.21 BioData 227
- 11.22 BioDiscovery 227
- 11.23 BioForce Nanosciences 227
- 11.24 BioGenex 228
- 11.25 Bioinformatics Solutions 228
- 11.26 Biomax Informatics 228
- 11.27 BioMerieux 229
- 11.28 Biomind 229
- 11.29 Bio-Rad Laboratories 229
- 11.30 Biosite 230
- 11.31 BioSystems International 230
- 11.32 Biotrin 230
- 11.33 BioWisdom 230
- 11.34 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company 231
- 11.35 Caliper Life Sciences 232
- 11.36 Caprion Proteomics 235
- 11.37 Carestream Health 237
- 11.38 Celera 237
- 11.39 Cepheid 239
- 11.40 Chang Bioscience 241
- 11.41 Clontech Laboratories 241
- 11.42 CombiMatrix 241
- 11.43 Compugen 243
- 11.44 Corimbia 244
- 11.45 Covance 244
- 11.46 Cybrdi 244
- 11.47 CyVera 244
- 11.48 Dako A/S 244
- 11.49 Decodon 245
- 11.50 Definiens 245
- 11.51 DiagnoSwiss 246
- 11.52 Discerna 246
- 11.53 DNAStar 246
- 11.54 DNATools 246
- 11.55 Eidogen-Sertanty 247
- 11.56 Electric Genetics 247
- 11.57 Eli Lilly and Company 247
- 11.58 Entelos 248
- 11.59 ePitope Informatics 248
- 11.60 Eurogentec 248
- 11.61 Exiqon A/S 249
- 11.62 Forensic Bioinformatics 249
- 11.63 Fujitsu 249
- 11.64 Future Diagnostics 250
- 11.65 Genaissance Pharmaceuticals 250
- 11.66 Gene Codes 250
- 11.67 Genedata 250
- 11.68 GeneGo 250
- 11.69 Gene Network Sciences 251
- 11.70 Geneva Bioinformatics 251
- 11.71 Genomatica 251
- 11.72 Genomic Solutions 251
- 11.73 Genomining 252
- 11.74 Gen-Probe 252
- 11.75 GE Healthcare 256
- 11.76 GeneStudio 256
- 11.77 Genomatix Software 256
- 11.78 GenomeQuest 257
- 11.79 Genus BioSystems 257
- 11.80 Genzyme 257
- 11.81 Geospiza 258
- 11.82 GlaxoSmithKline 259
- 11.83 Golden Helix 259
- 11.84 Grace Bio-Labs 260
- 11.85 Gyros AB 260
- 11.86 HealthCare IT 260
- 11.87 High Throughput Genomics 260
- 11.88 Human Genome Sciences 261
- 11.89 Illumina 261
- 11.90 Imgenex 264
- 11.91 Imaxia 264
- 11.92 INCOGEN 264
- 11.93 Incyte 265
- 11.94 InforSense 265
- 11.95 Ingenuity Systems 265
- 11.96 InPharmix 266
- 11.97 Insightful Corporation 266
- 11.98 Integromics, S.L 266
- 11.99 IBM 266
- 11.100 IO Informatics 267
- 11.101 Ipsen 268
- 11.102 Jerini AG 268
- 11.103 Johnson & Johnson 268
- 11.104 Koada Technology 269
- 11.105 KOOPrime 269
- 11.106 Life Technologies Corporation 269
- 11.107 LINCO Research 270
- 11.108 Luminex 270
- 11.109 Marligen Biosciences 271
- 11.110 Matrix Science 271
- 11.111 MDS 272
- 11.112 Merck & Company 272
- 11.113 Merck KGaA 273
- 11.114 Meso Scale Discovery 273
- 11.115 Metabolon 274
- 11.116 Microbionix 274
- 11.117 MicroDiscovery 274
- 11.118 Millennium Pharmaceuticals 275
- 11.119 Millipore 275
- 11.120 MiraiBio 276
- 11.121 Molecular Connections 276
- 11.122 MolMine AS 276
- 11.123 Molsoft 277
- 11.124 Monogram Biosciences 277
- 11.125 MTR Scientific 278
- 11.126 Multimetrix 278
- 11.127 Nanogen 278
- 11.128 Nanosphere 280
- 11.129 NetGenics 280
- 11.130 NextGen Sciences 280
- 11.131 NimbleGen Systems 281
- 11.132 Nonlinear Dynamics 281
- 11.133 Novartis 281
- 11.134 Nuvera Biosciences 282
- 11.135 Ocimum Biosolutions 282
- 11.136 OmniViz 282
- 11.137 One Lambda 282
- 11.138 Oracle 283
- 11.139 Ore Pharmaceuticals 284
- 11.140 Orla Protein Technologies 285
- 11.141 Osmetech 285
- 11.142 Oxonica 285
- 11.143 PamGene BV 286
- 11.144 Panomics 286
- 11.145 Partek 286
- 11.146 Pepscan 287
- 11.147 Perbio Science 287
- 11.148 Perlegen Sciences 287
- 11.149 Pfizer 287
- 11.150 PharmaSeq 288
- 11.151 Pierce Biotechnology 288
- 11.152 Platypus Technologies 288
- 11.153 Predictive Patterns Software 288
- 11.154 Proceryon 288
- 11.155 Protagen AG 289
- 11.156 ProteinOne 289
- 11.157 Proteome Sciences 289
- 11.158 PubGene 289
- 11.159 Qiagen 290
- 11.160 Radix BioSolutions 293
- 11.161 Randox Laboratories 294
- 11.162 RayBiotech 294
- 11.163 Redasoft 294
- 11.164 RedStorm Scientific 294
- 11.165 Reel Two 294
- 11.166 Rescentris 295
- 11.167 Roche 295
- 11.168 Rosetta Biosoftware 296
- 11.169 Rules-Based Medicine 296
- 11.170 SAS 296
- 11.171 Schleicher & Schuell BioScience 297
- 11.172 SciTegic 297
- 11.173 Semantx Life Sciences 297
- 11.174 Sequenom 297
- 11.175 Sigma-Aldrich 298
- 11.176 Silicon Genetics 299
- 11.177 Singulex 299
- 11.178 Softberry 299
- 11.179 SoftGenetics 299
- 11.180 SomaLogic 299
- 11.181 Spotfire 300
- 11.182 SPSS 300
- 11.183 Strand Life Sciences 301
- 11.184 Stratagene 301
- 11.185 SuperBioChips Laboratories 301
- 11.186 SurroMed 301
- 11.187 Sun Microsystems 301
- 11.188 Sygnis Pharma AG 302
- 11.189 Techne Corporation 302
- 11.190 Tepnel Life Sciences 303
- 11.191 Teranode 303
- 11.192 Textco BioSoftware 303
- 11.193 TG Services 304
- 11.194 Thermo Fisher Scientific 304
- 11.195 Third Wave Technologies 305
- 11.196 TIBCO Software 305
- 11.197 TimeLogic 305
- 11.198 TriStar Technology Group 305
- 11.199 Tyrian Diagnostics (formerly Proteome Systems) 306
- 11.200 VBC-Genomics Bioscience Research GmbH 306
- 11.201 Ventana Medical Systems 306
- 11.202 ViaLogy 307
- 11.203 Wyeth 307
- 11.204 Zeptosens 307
- 11.205 Zeus Scientific 308
- 11.206 Zyagen 308
Appendix 1: FDA Guidance for Industry: Pharmacogenomic Data Submission 309
- A 1.1 Introduction 309
- A 1.2 Background 309
- A 1.3 Submission Policy 310
- A 1.3.1 General Principles 310
- A 1.3.2 Specific Uses of Pharmacogenomic Data in Drug Development and
Labeling 311
- A 1.3.3 Benefits of Voluntary Submissions to Sponsors and FDA 312
- A 1.4 Submission of Pharmacogenomic Data 313
- A 1.4.1 Submission of Pharmacogenomic Data during the IND Phase 313
- A 1.4.2 Submission of Pharmacogenomic Data to a New NDA, BLA, or
Supplement 314
- A 1.4.3 Submission to a Previously Approved NDA or BLA 315
- A 1.4.4 Compliance with 21 CFR Part 58 315
- A 1.4.5 Submission of Voluntary Genomic Data from Application-Independent
Research 316
- A 1.5 Format and Content of a VGDS 316
- A 1.6 Process for Submitting Pharmacogenomic Data 317
- A 1.7 Agency Review of VGDSs 317
Glossary 319
INDEX OF FIGURES
- Figure 2.1: Drug Discovery and Development Paradigm 24
- Figure 2.2: Paradigm of Drug Discovery and Development Illustrating the
Central and Essential Role of Biomarkers in Screening 25
- Figure 2.3: Functional Genomic Process for Drug Development 26
- Figure 2.4: Reimbursement for Diagnostics in Healthcare Decision Making 30
- Figure 2.5: Market Growth and Evolution of Companion Biomarkers 31
- Figure 2.6: Medical Product Development Models 32
- Figure 2.7: Segmentation of the Biomarker Development Market 33
- Figure 2.8: Medical Research in the U.S. Outpaces the Rest of the World 45
- Figure 2.9: Worldwide Pharmaceutical Products Markets 48
- Figure 2.10: Biomarkers Market Drivers 58
- Figure 2.11: Challenges in the Biomarkers Space 59
- Figure 2.12: FDA Co-Developed Products 64
- Figure 3.1: Informatics Applications Along the Drug Discovery Value Chain
91
- Figure 3.2: Bioinformatics Software Flow Chart 91
- Figure 3.3: Growth of GenBank, 1982 - 2008 92
- Figure 3.4: Role of Bioinformatics in the Drug Discovery Value Chain 102
- Figure 3.5: Challenges in the Study or Utilization of Proteomic Biomarkers
107
- Figure 3.6: Challenges in the Study or Utilization of Companion Diagnostic
Biomarkers 107
- Figure 3.7: Top Unmet Needs in Products in the Biomarkers Space 108
- Figure 4.1: Growth and Evolution of the Biomarker Space 120
- Figure 4.2: Revenue Forecast Projections for Global Biomarker Markets by
Segments, 2005 - 2012 121
- Figure 4.3: Biomarker Discovery by Therapeutic Area 122
- Figure 4.4: Kidney Biomarker Paradigm 125
- Figure 4.5: Hepatic Biomarker Paradigm 127
- Figure 9.1: IPRG Biomarker Qualification Process 167
- Figure 9.2: Critical Path for Drug Development 180
- Figure 9.3: Path for R&D Product Development 181
- Figure 9.4: Dimensions of the Critical Path 181
- Figure 9.5: FDA Interactions During Drug Development 182
- Figure 9.6: Problem Resolution During the FDA Review Process 182
- Figure 9.7: VGDS Process Flow 193
- Figure 10.1: Discovery, Validation and Use of Biomarkers 201
INDEX OF TABLES
- Table 2.1: Utility of Biomarkers as Companion Diagnostics to Drug
Development 20
- Table 2.2: Biomarker End Points in Drug Development 22
- Table 2.3: Value of Biomarkers in Phase II Clinical Trials 24
- Table 2.4: Comparative Genome Sizes of Humans and Other Organisms 27
- Table 2.5: Global Pharmaceutical Drug Sales, 2004 - 2012 38
- Table 2.6: Worldwide Generic Pharmaceutical Drug Market, 2003 - 2012 39
- Table 2.7: Worldwide OTC Pharmaceutical Drug Market, 2003 - 2012 39
- Table 2.8: Worldwide Biopharmaceutical Drug Market, 2003 - 2012 40
- Table 2.9: Top Ten Pharmaceutical Companies by Worldwide Sales, 2008 40
- Table 2.10: Pharmaceutical Companies' Drug Sales as Percent of the
Worldwide Market, 2008 41
- Table 2.11: Threats to Pharmaceutical Industry Productivity 42
- Table 2.12: Competitive Forces Governing the Pharmaceutical Industry 42
- Table 2.13: Time Line for Development of Companion Diagnostics 43
- Table 2.14: Leading Therapy Classes for R&D, 2008 44
- Table 2.15: Global Pharmaceutical Industry R&D Spending, 1995 - 2008 46
- Table 2.16: Pharmaceutical R&D Expenditures by World Region, 1990 - 2006 46
- Table 2.17: U.S. Government NIH Research Budget, 1995 - 2008 47
- Table 2.18: Pharmaceutical Companies Ranked by Total R&D Expenditures,
2006 47
- Table 2.19: Global Pharmaceutical Sales by Region, 2007 48
- Table 2.20: World' s Top-Selling Drugs, 2007 49
- Table 2.21: Top Pharmaceutical Companies by Healthcare Revenue, 2008 50
- Table 2.22: Leading Therapy Classes by Global Pharmaceutical Sales, 2007 50
- Table 2.23: Leading Ten Therapeutic Classes by U.S. Sales, 2003, 2006 and
2007 50
- Table 2.24: Top Ten Therapeutic Classes by U.S. Dispensed Prescriptions,
2006 and 2007 51
- Table 2.25: Top Ten Brand Drugs by Retail Dollars, 2007 51
- Table 2.26: Pharmaceuticals Industry Challenges 54
- Table 2.27: Reasons for Developing Phase I Biomarkers 55
- Table 2.28: Percentage of Non-Responders in Various Drug Classes 56
- Table 2.31: High Profile Drug Withdrawals from the Marketplace 56
- Table 2.30: Market Opportunities in Biomarkers 59
- Table 2.31: Challenges for Market Adoption of the Various Biomarkers Tests
60
- Table 2.32: Biomarkers Industry SWOT 62
- Table 3.1: Worldwide Microarray Market Size, 2004 - 2012 71
- Table 3.2: List of DNA Array Manufacturers 78
- Table 3.3: U.S. qRT-PCR Market, 2007 - 2013 84
- Table 3.4: Theranostics Technology Platforms-Timeline of Impact 85
- Table 3.5: Impact of Personalized Medicine on Various Therapeutic Areas 86
- Table 3.6: Hurdles in Biomarkers Development in Therapeutic Areas 87
- Table 3.7: Data Source and Bioinformatic Investigations 95
- Table 3.8: Drivers and Challenges of the Bioinformatics Industry 98
- Table 3.9: Bioinformatics Activities, Sub-Activities and Key Players 104
- Table 3.10: Concentration of Some Abundant Proteins, New Cancer Biomarkers
Identified by SELDI-TOF, and Classical Cancer Biomarkers in Serum 113
- Table 3.11: Device Submission Elements for the FDA 113
- Table 3.12: Toxicogenomic Standards and Their Organizations 117
- Table 3.13: Genomic and Proteomic Technologies 118
- Table 4.1: Companion Biomarker Market Size, 2008 - 2013. 119
- Table 4.2: Kidney Biomarkers 126
- Table 4.3: Herceptin Worldwide Sales, 1999 - 2007 129
- Table 4.4: Characteristics of Different Cancer Biomarker Types and
Associated Market Opportunities 130
- Table 4.5: Segmentation of the Cancer Biomarker Market by Type of Cancer
Biomarkers and Market Size 131
- Table 4.6: Cancer Biomarker Market Estimates by Tissue of Origin 132
- Table 4.7: Companies Developing New Proteomic Cancer Biomarker Technology
Platforms 133
- Table 4.8: Cancer Biomarkers Used to Maximize Likelihood of Response 134
- Table 4.9: Biomarkers for Monitoring Therapeutic Effectiveness and
Resistance 135
- Table 6.1: Contract Research Companies 146
- Table 8.1: Stakeholders in Biomarker Development 154
- Table 9.1: Structure of the Critical Path 172
- Table 9.2: Device Submission Elements for the FDA 184
|
Related Report
|