the-infoshop.com - The vertical markets research portal
View CartView Cart
Global Information, Inc.
US: +1-860-674-8796
EU: +32-2-535-7543
SG: +65-6223-2436
  Home | Category | Publishers | Custom Research | E-mail Alert | About Us | Contact Us | Site Map |
 
Market Research Report

The Orthopedic Surgery Opportunity Index: Capitalizing on Market Gaps

Published by Valid Results, Inc Contact us : +1-860-674-8796
Published 2006/12 Content info 66 pages
Product code 55670
Price From  US $ 3500 Order/Price list
US $ 3500 Hard Copy (Single User License)
US $ 3500 PDF by E-mail (Single User License)
US $ 3500 PDF On CD-ROM (Single User License)
US $ 4200 Hard Copy (Global Site License)
US $ 4200 PDF by E-mail (Global Site License)
US $ 4200 PDF On CD-ROM (Global Site License)
Delivery Time
PDF by E-Mail
Approx. 1-2 business days
Hard Copy/CD-ROM
Approx. 3-4 business days
If you need expedited delivery, please call us.
Description TOC

Table of Contents

  • Introduction & Report Overview
    • Abstract
    • Measurement Objectives
    • Sample design and distribution
    • Measurement & Data Collection design
    • How to read this report
  • Executive Summary & Key Findings
  • Detailed Findings
    • I. Importance of various considerations for ortho surgeons in selecting product preference
      • a. Important considerations influencing product preferences for orthopedic surgeons
        • i. Product quality
        • ii. Pricing
        • iii. Innovation
        • iv. Training / Continuing education
        • v. Sales reps
        • vi. Surgeon support / Customer service
        • vii. Clinical data
        • viii. Business assistance (marketing, advertising)
      • b. Orthopedic Surgeons ratings of importance considerations
        • (1= No Importance...5= Very Important)
        • i. Product quality
        • ii. Pricing
        • iii. Innovation
        • iv. Training / Continuing education
        • v. Sales reps
        • vi. Surgeon support / Customer service
        • vii. Clinical data
        • viii. Business assistance (marketing, advertising)
    • II. Awareness & Associations of Orthopedic Surgery Product Manufacturers
      • a. Orthopedic Surgeons Awareness and experience with featured manufacturers
        • (Unaware)
        • (Aware but don' t use)
        • (Currently use)
        • (Used in the past but discontinued)
        • i. Arthrex
        • ii. ArthroCare
        • iii. Biomet
        • iv. ConMed / Linvatec
        • v. DePuy Orthopedics (J&J)
        • vi. DePuy Mitek (J&J)
        • vii. Encore
        • viii. Ethicon
        • ix. Smith & Nephew Orthopedics
        • x. Smith & Nephew Endoscopy
        • xi. Stryker Orthopedic / Howmedica Osteonics
        • xii. Stryker Biotech
        • xiii. Zimmer
        • xiv. Ortho Development
      • b. Top of mind products for featured manufacturers to orthopedic surgeons
      • c. For orthopedic surgeons, which manufacturer comes to mind given the following terms
        • i. Traditional
        • ii. Professional
        • iii. Established
        • iv. Flexible
        • v. Up and Coming
        • vi. Declining
        • vii. Cutting Edge
    • III. Orthopedic Surgeons Perceptions of Manufacturer Performance
      • a. Which of these companies is best overall according to orthopedic surgeons
        • i. Arthrex
        • ii. ArthroCare
        • iii. Biomet
        • iv. ConMed / Linvatec
        • v. DePuy Orthopedics (J&J)
        • vi. DePuy Mitek (J&J)
        • vii. Encore
        • viii. Ethicon
        • ix. Smith & Nephew Orthopedics
        • x. Smith & Nephew Endoscopy
        • xi. Stryker Orthopedic / Howmedica Osteonics
        • xii. Stryker Biotech
        • xiii. Zimmer
        • xiv. Ortho Development
      • b. Which of these companies is worst overall according to orthopedic surgeons
        • i. Arthrex
        • ii. ArthroCare
        • iii. Biomet
        • iv. ConMed / Linvatec
        • v. DePuy Orthopedics (J&J)
        • vi. DePuy Mitek (J&J)
        • vii. Encore
        • viii. Ethicon
        • ix. Smith & Nephew Orthopedics
        • x. Smith & Nephew Endoscopy
        • xi. Stryker Orthopedic / Howmedica Osteonics
        • xii. Stryker Biotech
        • xiii. Zimmer
        • xiv. Ortho Development
      • c. Manufacturer performance ratings on the following considerations
        • i. Product quality
        • ii. Pricing
        • iii. Innovation
        • iv. Training / Continuing education
        • v. Sales reps
        • vi. Surgeon support / Customer service
        • vii. Clinical data
        • viii. Business assistance (marketing, advertising)
      • d. Relative positioning ratings standardized by featured considerations
      • e. Relative positioning ratings standardized by featured manufacturer
      • f. Derived manufacturer performance ratings by featured considerations
  • Conclusions
    • Recommendations
    • Suggested Analysis
  • About the Author / Valid Results

Table of Figures

  • Figure A-1 Geographical Spread of Respondents
  • Table 1-1 Considerations Influencing Product Preferences
  • Table 1-2 Categories of Considerations Influencing Product Preferences
  • Figure 1-1 Top 3 Important Considerations (categorized)
  • Table 1-3 Importance of Considerations
  • Figure 1-2 90% Confidence Intervals Importance Means
  • Table 2-1 Company Product Experience
  • Table 2-2 Arthrex ? Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-3 ArthroCare Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-4 Biomet Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-5 ConMed / Linvatec Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-6 DePuy Orthopedics (J&J) Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-7 DePuy Mitek (J&J) Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-8 Encore Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-9 Ethicon Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-10 Smith and Nephew Orthopedics Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-11 Smith and Nephew Endoscopy Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-12 Stryker Orthopedic / Howmedica Osteonics Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-13 Stryker Biotech Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-14 Zimmer Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-15 Ortho Development Top of Mind Product
  • Figure 2-1 Summary of Manufacturer and Product Associations
  • Table 2-16 Top of Mind Company
  • Table 2-17 Top of Mind Company continued
  • Figure 2-2 Relative Positioning of Various Companies
  • Table 3-1 Best Companies Overall
  • Table 3-2 Worst Companies Overall
  • Figure 3-1 90% Confidence Interval Overall Opinion Mean Ratings
  • Figure 3-2 90% Confidence Interval Quality Mean Rating
  • Figure 3-3 90% Confidence Interval Pricing Mean Ratings
  • Figure 3-4 90% Confidence Interval Innovation Mean Ratings
  • Figure 3-5 90% Confidence Interval Training/Education Means Ratings
  • Figure 3-6 90% Confidence Interval Sales Rep Mean Ratings
  • Figure 3-7 90% Confidence Interval Support Mean Ratings
  • Figure 3-8 90% Confidence Interval Clinical Data Mean Ratings
  • Figure 3-9 90% Confidence Interval Business Assistance Mean Ratings
  • Figure 3-10 90% Overall Value Mean Ratings
  • Figure 3-11 Arthrex Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-12 ArthroCare Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-13 Biomet Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-14 ConMed / Linvatec Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-15 DePuy Orthopedics Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-16 DePuy Mitek Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-17 Encore Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-18 Ethicon Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-19 Smith and Nephew Orthopedics Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-20 Smith and Nephew Endoscopic Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-21 Stryker Orthopedics Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-22 Stryker Biotech Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-23 Zimmer Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-24 Ortho Development Derived Performance
Related Report
Back to Top
Please inform me when related publications are released
InfoWatch