Web 2.0 Server and Push Software Market Shares, Market Strategies, and Market Forecasts, 2008-2014

• Web 2.0 Servers Executive Summary
• Web 2.0 Implements Push Technology
• Web 2.0 Networking Heuristics Value
  • Web 2.0 Server Market Driving Forces
• Web 2.0 Server Market Shares
• Web 2.0 Server Forecasts

1. Web 2.0 Servers Market Description and Market Dynamics

• 1.1 Web 2.0 Internet Scale Mainstream Applications
  • 1.1.1 Web 2.0 Design Patterns
  • 1.1.2 Data is t Next for Web 2.0
  • 1.1.3 Network Effects
  • 1.1.4 Collaboration
  • 1.1.5 Social Networking Heuristics
  • 1.1.6 Wiki-Style Collaborative Editing
• 1.2 Core Competencies of Web 2.0
• 1.3 Web 2.0 Next Generation Applications
• 1.4 Web 2.0 Impact On Business Environment
  • 1.4.1 Web 2.0 Corporate and Marketing Communications
• 1.5 Blogging
  • 1.5.1 Architecture of Participation
  • 1.5.2 Permalink Functionality
• 1.6 Web 2.0 Driven By Data
  • 1.6.1 Control Over The Database
• 1.7 Web 2.0 Advertising Business
  • 1.7.1 Google' s Lightweight Programming Model Has Led To The Creation Of Numerous Value-Added Services
• 1.8 Scientific Collaboration Using Web 2.0
  • 1.8.1 OpenWetWare Project At MIT

2. Web 2.0 Servers Market Shares and Forecasts

• 2.1 Advertising Revenue Drives Web 2.0
  • 2.1.1 Web 2.0 Changing How The Enterprise And Society Functions
  • 2.1.2 Web 2.0 Server Market Driving Forces
  • 2.1.3 Google Technologies Leverage AJAX To Implement Web Design
• 2.2 Web 2.0 Server Market Shares
  • 2.2.1 HP Web 2.0
  • 2.2.2 Dell Selling PCs in Second Life!
  • 2.2.3 Google
  • 2.2.4 IBM iDataPlex Web 2.0 Form Factor
  • 2.2.5 Sun Web 2.0 Internet
  • 2.2.6 Google
  • 2.2.7 Robotic Manufacturing
• 2.3 x86 Market Shares 2007
• 2.4 Web 2.0 Server Forecasts
  • 2.4.1 Server Electricity Usage
  • 2.4.2 Google Investing In Renewable Energy

3. Web 2.0 Servers Description

• 3.1 Sun Web 2.0 Internet
  • 3.1.1 Sun Web 2.0 Positioning
  • 3.1.2 Sun Microsystems Web 2.0 Innovation
  • 3.1.3 Sun / Fujitsu
  • 3.1.4 Sun, Fujitsu, and Fujitsu Siemens Web 2.0 Energy Efficient Servers
  • 3.1.5 Fujitsu / Sun
  • 3.1.6 Sparc Enterprise T5140 And T5240 Servers Scale
  • 3.1.7 SPARC Enterprise T5140 and T5240 Servers
• 3.2 IBM Web 2.0
  • 3.2.1 IBM Web 2.0 Technologies
  • 3.2.2 IBM Web 2.0 iDataPlex
  • 3.2.3 IBM iDataPlex Web 2.0 Form Factor
  • 3.2.4 IBM Web 2.0 Mashups
  • 3.2.5 IBM Internally Developing And Evangelizing Web 2.0 Tools
• 3.3 HP Web 2.0
  • 3.3.1 Hewlett-Packard HP Proliant
• 3.4 Dell
  • 3.4.1 Dell 2-Socket 1U High Availability Rack Server
  • 3.4.2 Dell Selling PCs in Second Life!
• 3.5 Intel® Web 2.0 Technology Development
• 3.6 AMD
• 3.7 Google
  • 3.7.1 Google Infrastructure
• 3.8 Microsoft Platform Approach Instead of Application
  • 3.8.1 Akamai vs. BitTorrent
  • 3.8.2 Harnessing Collective Intelligence

4. Web 2.0 Implementations and Technology

• 4.1 Google Scale Mainstream Applications Gmail and Google Maps
  • 4.1.1 Google.com - Search and Personalization
  • 4.1.2 Google Scholar.
  • 4.1.3 Google Server Implementation for Web 2.0
  • 4.1.4 Google Replicates The Web pages
  • 4.1.5 Google Map / Reduce Framework Runs In Parallel On 1,000 Machines
  • 4.1.6 Google Global Work Queue
  • 4.1.7 Communication, Collaboration and Communities
  • 4.1.8 Google Spent $250 Million On Hardware Equipment In 2004, $1.4 Billion in 2007
  • 4.1.9 Google Uses 1.8 Million Servers, Search Results, Images, Videos, Emails And Ads
  • 4.1.10 Google Dynamic Architecture Implementation
  • 4.1.11 Short Description of Google Search Engine Dynamic Architecture
  • 4.1.12 Google BigFiles
  • 4.1.13 Google Repository
• 4.2 eBay Infrastructure
  • 4.2.1 Sun Storage Helps Keep The Store Open
  • 4.2.2 eBay' s Infrastructure Evolution
• 4.3 Microsoft .Net Defines Reusable Modules Dynamically
  • 4.3.1 Microsoft Data Center Size
  • 4.3.2 Microsoft Combines Managed Modules into Assemblies
  • 4.3.3 Microsoft Architecture Dynamic Modular Processing
• 4.4 IBM® WebSphere® Application Server Feature Pack for Web 2.0
  • 4.4.1 IBM Web 2.0 Steps To Deploy Websphere Application Server Using Virtual Image Templates
  • 4.4.2 IBM WebSphere Application Server Feature Pack
• 4.5 Facebook
• 4.6 MySpace
• 4.7 Reunion
• 4.8 Software Release Cycle
• 4.9 iTunes and TiVo

5. Web 2.0 Servers Company Profiles

• 5.1 DoubleClick vs. Overture and AdSense
• 5.2 Facebook
• 5.3 FortiusOne
• 5.4 Fujitsu
  • 5.4.1 Fujitsu Network Communications
  • 5.4.2 Fujitsu Considers WiMAX vs. 3G vs. Wi-Fi
  • 5.4.3 Fujitsu FLASHWAVE® 7500 Small System
  • 5.4.4 Fujitsu FASST Transition Solutions
• 5.5 Google
  • 5.5.1 Google Revenues
  • 5.5.2 Wayne Rosing Former CTO Comments On Push Technology
• 5.6 Hewlett Packard
  • 5.6.1 HP Products and Services: Segment Information
  • 5.6.2 Hewlett Packard Technology Solutions Group
  • 5.6.3 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Storage and Servers
  • Hewlett Packard Service-Oriented Architecture
  • HP SOA Center Components
  • HP Financial Information 2008
  • HP Personal Systems Group
  • HP Imaging and Printing Group
  • HP Enterprise Storage and Servers
  • HP Services
  • HP Software
  • HP Financial Services
  • HP Technology Positioning
• 5.7 IBM
  • 5.7.1 IBM' s Capabilities
  • IBM SOA Infrastructure
  • IBM WebSphere SOA Business Integration Foundation
  • 5.7.2 IBM 2008 Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year Revenue
• 5.8 MySpace
• 5.9 Postful
• 5.10 Reunion
• 5.11 SearchForce
• 5.12 Sun Microsystems
  • 5.12.1 Sun Microsystems Network Computing Infrastructure
  • 5.12.2 Sun Business Strategy
  • 5.12.3 Sun Startup Essentials Program
  • 5.12.4 Sun Web 2.0 Customer Base
• 5.13 Yahoo
  • 5.13.1 Yahoo has 30,000 servers.
  • 5.13.2 Yahoo Revenues
  • 5.13.3 Yahoo Business Segment Results
  • 5.13.4 Yahoo Server Capital Expenditures2

• Table ES-1
• Web 2.0 Market Driving Forces
• Table ES-1 (Continued)
• Web 2.0 Market Driving Forces
• Figure ES-2
• Worldwide Web 2.0 Low End x86 Server Shipments Market Shares, Dollars, 2007
• Figure ES-3
• Worldwide Web 2.0 Small Server Shipments Market Forecasts, Dollars, 2008-2014
• Table 1-1
• Harnessing Collective Intelligence
• Table 1-2
• Web 2.0 Next Generation Applications Providers
• Table 1-3
• Web 2.0 Web Space Characteristics
• Table 1-4
• Web 2.0 Next Generation Applications
• Table 1-5
• Web 2.0 Next Generation Functions
• Table 1-6
• Mashup Market Opportunity
• Table 1-7
• Web 2.0 Internet Examples
• Table 1-7 (Continued)
• Web 2.0 Internet Examples
• Table 2-1
• Web 2.0 Market Driving Forces
• Table 2-1 (Continued)
• Web 2.0 Market Driving Forces
• Table 2-2
• Web 2.0 Ajax Technology Functions
• Figure 2-3
• Worldwide Web 2.0 x86 Server With Onboard Storage Shipments Vendor and Internal Purchase Market Shares, Dollars, 2007
• Table 2-4
• Worldwide Web 2.0 x86 Server With On Board Storage Vendor and Internal Purchase Shipments, Market Shares,Dollars, 2007
• Table 2-5
• Worldwide Web 2.0 x86 Server With On Board Storage Vendor and Internal Purchase Shipments, Market Shares, Units, 2007
• Table 2-6
• Worldwide Web 2.0 x86 Server With On Board Storage Vendor and Internal Purchase Shipments, Market Shares, Units, 2007
• Table 2-7
• Worldwide Low End x86 Server Shipments, Market Shares, Dollars, 2007
• Table 2-8
• Worldwide Low End x86 Server Shipments, Market Shares, Units, 2007
• Table 2-9
• Worldwide Low End x86 Server Shipments, Market Shares, Units, 2007
• Table 2-10
• Worldwide Web 2.0 Low End x86 Integrated Storage Server Shipments, Market Shares, Units, 2007
• Figure 2-11
• Worldwide Web 2.0 Server and Low End x86 Server With On Board Storage Market Forecasts, Dollars, 2008-2014
• Table 2-12
• Worldwide Web 2.0 Server and Low End x86 Server With On Board Storage Market Forecasts, Dollars, 2008-2014
• Table 2-13
• Worldwide x86 Server and On Board Dual Processor and Quad Processor Market Forecasts, Dollars, 2008-2014
• Figure 2-14
• WinterGreen Research ROI Google Server Electricity Analysis
• Figure 2-15
• WinterGreen Research Google Server Air Conditioning and Total Electricity Analysis
• Table 3-1
• Sun Web 2.0 Internet Positioning
• Figure 3-2
• IBM2.0 iDataPlex
• Table 3-3
• HP Web 2.0 SDP 2.0' s Portfolio Of Solutions
• Table 3-3 (Continued)
• HP Web 2.0 SDP 2.0' s Portfolio Of Solutions
• Table 3-4
• Hewlett Packard Web 2.0 Server Positioning
• Table 3-5
• Hewlett Packard Web 2.0 Server Applications
• Table 3-6
• HP SIP Solution Benefits
• Figure 3-7
• Dell f5 Web 2.0 Server
• Table 3-8
• Dell PowerEdge 1950 III Server
• Table 3-9
• Intel Web 2.0 applications Design Support
• Table 3-10
• Intel Web 2.0 TDK Developer Functions
• Table 3-11
• Intel Web 2.0 Software Key Features
• Table 4-1
• Google Use of Ajax Technology
• Table 4-2
• WinterGreen Research Server Energy Costs�@for 14 Servers with 3 Processors
• Figure 4-2
• Google Dynamic Architecture
• Figure 4-4
• Repository Data Structure
• Figure 4-5
• EBay Architecture
• Table 4-6
• Microsoft .Net Defines Reusable Modules
• Figure 4-7
• MegaData Center Capital Expenditures
• Figure 4-8
• Microsoft .NET assemblies:
• Figure 4-9
• Microsoft Architecture Dynamic Modular Processing
• Figure 4-10
• Steps To Deploy IBM WebSphere Application Server Using A Virtual Image Template
• Figure 4-11
• WebSphere Application Server Network Deployment Installation And Configuration Steps
• Figure 4-12
• IBM Web Architecture
• Table 4-13
• Facebook Description. 2007 to April 2008
• Table 4-13 (Continued)
• Facebook Description. 2007 to April 2008
• Table 4-13 (Continued)
• Facebook Description. 2007 to April 2008
• Table 4-14
• MySpace Metrics
• Table 4-14 (Continued)
• MySpace Metrics
• Table 4-15
• Reunion Metrics
• Figure 5-1
• Fujitsu Server Innovation
• Table 5-2
• Fujitsu Server Positioning
• Table 5-3
• Fujitsu Servers
• Table 5-4
• Google Advertising Positioning
• Table 5-5
• HP Systinet SOA Center Components Key Capabilities
• Table 5-6
• Yahoo Search Offerings