[Report]
The Business Case for Picocells and Femtocells in the Enterprise Market
Published: 2007/11
|
|

 |
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents
- 0. Summary
- 1. Deploying picocells and femtocells in the enterprise market will be
challenging
- 2. Indoor base stations could help MNOs to attract enterprises
- 2.1 MNOs must not neglect the enterprise market
- 2.2 The provision of indoor services is an area of weakness for MNOs
- 2.3 Indoor base stations could enable MNOs to counter the threat of
alternative solutions
- 2.4 MNOs should strive to meet the challenging indoor service
requirements of the business market
- 2.5 MNOs should apply commerical logic to the deployment of indoor base
stations
- 3. Early movers are seizing opportunities with 2G picocells
- 3.1 2G picocells are already commercially available and deployed
- 3.2 Low-power GSM licences have been awarded in the UK and are suitable
for picocell services
- 3.3 Spring Mobil targets Swedish enterprises with picocell services
- 4. ARPU and transmission costs underpin picocell service viability
- 4.1 Current standalone picocell services require 30 users or more to
achieve financial viability
- 4.2 The most sensitive aspects of the business case are ARPU and
transmission
- 4.2 There is substantial value in targeting smaller businesses
- 5. 3G femtocells have potential in very small businesses
- 5.1 Opportunities for 3G femtocells exist beyond the consumer market
- 5.2 3G femtocells could support non-voice services, but with possible
transmission and capacity bottlenecks
- 5.3 The potential for 3G femtocells to support greater user densities
needs thorough investigation
- 6. Enterprise solutions require a number of factors to succeed
- 6.1 Indoor base station equipment is just one component of an enterprise
solution
- 6.2 MNOs must target the weaknesses of WLAN services
Actions
List of Figures and Tables
FIGURES:
- Figure 0.1: Major revenue and cost elements of an MNO' s business
case for indoor base station deployment in enterprises
- Figure 2.1: The scope of enterprise mobility
- Figure 2.2: Major revenue and cost elements of an MNO' s business
case for indoor base station deployment in enterprises
- Figure 4.1: Breakdown of cost to MNOs per user per month for an
enterprise picocell solution, for different numbers of users
- Figure 4.2: ARPU generated by an enterprise picocell service in
three scenarios
- Figure 4.3: Number of service users required by a picocell operator
to achieve a 10% revenue margin, given three different transmission solutions
- Figure 5.1: Incremental ARPU per month in two enterprise femtocell
service scenarios
- Figure 5.2: Cost per user per month in two enterprise femtocell
service scenarios
- Figure 6.1: Estimated up-front investment cost per user for a WLAN
VoIP solution
TABLES:
- Table 2.1: The scope of enterprise mobility
- Table 3.1: Bids for low-power GSM licences in the UK
- Table 5.1: Typical average downlink throughput of GSM and W-CDMA
family of cellular technologies in different environments
- Table 5.2: Two enterprise femtocell scenarios that achieve
satisfactory financial return
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Report]
The Business Case for Picocells and Femtocells in the Enterprise Market
Published: 2007/11
|
Published by : Analysys Mason  |
|
|
Price:
|
Product Code : AN58323 |
|
|
Please inform me when related publications are released
|