the-infoshop.com - The vertical markets research portal
View CartView Cart
Global Information, Inc.
US: +1-860-674-8796
EU: +32-2-535-7543
SG: +65-6223-2436
  Home | Catalog | E-mail Alert | Custom Research | About The Infoshop | Contact Us | Site Map |

* View All Categories
Japanese Korean Chinese

[Report]

Scientific Publications Strategy: Managing Reputation, Clinical Trial Results and Commercial Relevance

Published: 2007/04

Contact 24 hrs/day
Table of Contents

Abstract

Abstract

STUDY OVERVIEW

Study Background - Over the past few years, scientific journals and government regulators have increased the scrutiny and expectations facing pharmaceutical companies looking to publish the results of their clinical trials. While picking and choosing favorable findings may have been acceptable a decade ago it is now considered unethical and potentially illegal. As a result of these changing expectations and regulations, global publications leaders at pharmaceutical companies are carefully building strategy that ethically presents all study findings while still driving brand strength.

Study Objective - This research was launched to determine how leading pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies are shaping their global publications strategies and plans in order to maintain scientific credibility while also delivering commercially relevant publications that drive brand success. Benchmark participants from 14 leading pharmaceutical companies provided their insights and metrics to identify industry trends and performance standards.

KEY TOPICS COVERED IN THE RESEARCH

  • Global Publications Structure and Functional Home (Medical vs. Marketing)
  • Key Contributors and Stakeholders in Strategy Development and Plan Delivery
  • Effective Publications Vehicles, Content and Audiences
  • Using Alternative Media
  • Planning for Neutral/Negative Results
  • Changes in Resources and Outsourcing
  • Measuring Performance
  • Strategic Next Steps

KEY METRICS

  • Centralization for Publications Strategy, Planning and Plan Delivery
  • Percent of Companies Where Regional Groups Contribute to Strategy Percent of Companies With Strategies for Publishing Neutral/Negative Results
  • Percent of Global Publications Resources that are Outsourced
  • Measures Used for Performance Evaluation

METHODOLOGY

This study was conducted through surveys and qualitative interviews with pharmaceutical and biotechnology Global Publication Strategy executives.

Industries Profiled:

Pharmaceutical; Biotech; Health Care; Diagnostic; Manufacturing

Companies Profiled:

Pfizer; Eli Lilly; Abbott; Shire; Amgen; Genentech; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; GlaxoSmithKline ; Human Genome Sciences; Vertex Pharmaceuticals; Merck; Biogen

Table of Contents

[Report]
Scientific Publications Strategy: Managing Reputation, Clinical Trial Results and Commercial Relevance
Published: 2007/04
Published by : Best Practices, LLC Best Practices, LLC

Price:
US $ 3,695.00 PDF by E-mail (Single User License) + 1 Hard Copy
US $ 11,085.00 PDF by E-mail (Site License) + 1 Hard Copy
US $ 18,475.00 PDF by E-mail (Corporate User License) + 1 Hard Copy
>
Product Code : BEPR54307
Please inform me when related publications are released
InfoWatch

Available 24 Hours a Day
US: 1-860-674-8796 EU: 32-2-535-7543 SG: 65-6223-2436
The vertical markets research portal
© 2008, the-infoshop.com by Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.