Car Telematics and Wireless M2M

Table of Contents

• Table of Contents
• List of Figures
• Executive summary
• 1 Passenger cars in Europe
  • 1.1 Introduction
  • 1.2 Car manufacturers
  • 1.3 Leasing and rental companies
  • 1.4 Motor insurance
  • 1.5 Emergency services and assistance providers
    • 1.5.1 PSAP and SOC organisations
    • 1.5.2 Assistance providers
    • 1.5.3 Automobile clubs
• 2 Car telematics solutions
  • 2.1 Car telematics infrastructure
    • 2.1.1 Vehicle segment
    • 2.1.2 Tracking segment
    • 2.1.3 Network segment
    • 2.1.4 Service segment
  • 2.2 Car telematics applications
    • 2.2.1 eCall and driver assistance
    • 2.2.2 Stolen vehicle recovery
    • 2.2.3 Motor insurance telematics
    • 2.2.4 Leasing and rental fleet management
    • 2.2.5 Vehicle diagnostics
  • 2.3 Aftermarket solutions versus OEM solutions
• 3 Market forecasts and trends
  • 3.1 Car telematics market forecast
  • 3.2 Application trends
    • 3.2.1 eCall: Pending regulatory process
    • 3.2.2 SVR: Declining price advantage for RF tracking against GSM/GPS
    • 3.2.3 Motor insurance telematics
  • 3.3 Value chain analysis
    • 3.3.1 Aftermarket solution providers
    • 3.3.2 OEM solution providers
    • 3.3.3 Car brands and dealers
    • 3.3.4 Telecom industry players
  • 3.4 Future industry trends
• 4 Aftermarket vehicle tracking solutions
  • 4.1 Value chain overview
  • 4.2 Aftermarket vehicle tracking solution providers
    • 4.2.1 AutoGuard
    • 4.2.2 Caesar Satellite
    • 4.2.3 Cobra Automotive Technologies
    • 4.2.4 Detector
    • 4.2.5 MetaSystem and Octo Telematics
    • 4.2.6 SECAR
    • 4.2.7 TRACKER Network
    • 4.2.8 Traqueur
    • 4.2.9 Trafficmaster
    • 4.2.10 Viasat Group
    • 4.2.11 Other vehicle tracking vendors
  • 4.3 Insurance industry telematics initiatives
    • 4.3.1 Austria: UNIQA SafeLine
    • 4.3.2 Italy: Motor insurance providers adopt telematics to combat theft and fraud
    • 4.3.3 Spain: MAPFRE launches Generation Y pilot project
    • 4.3.4 United Kingdom: Norwich Union Pay As You Drive
    • 4.3.5 United Kingdom: Thatcham CAT 5 and TQA vehicle security standards
• 5 OEM telematics solutions
  • 5.1 Value chain overview
  • 5.2 Automotive suppliers
    • 5.2.1 Autoliv
    • 5.2.2 Continental Automotive Systems
    • 5.2.3 Magneti Marelli
  • 5.3 Telematics service providers
    • 5.3.1 Altea
    • 5.3.2 ATX Group
    • 5.3.3 Eurowatch
    • 5.3.4 IMA
    • 5.3.5 Tema.Mobility
    • 5.3.6 WirelessCar
  • 5.4 OEM telematics propositions
    • 5.4.1 BMW
    • 5.4.2 Fiat Group
    • 5.4.3 Jaguar and Land Rover
    • 5.4.4 Porsche
    • 5.4.5 PSA Group
    • 5.4.6 Volvo Cars
• 6 The European eCall initiative
  • 6.1 Regulatory process
    • 6.1.1 Activities of DG eCall and other working groups
    • 6.1.2 Actions by the EC and EU Member States
    • 6.1.3 Lobbying by industry stakeholders
  • 6.2 eCall functional specifications and standardisation
    • 6.2.1 IVS functional specifications
    • 6.2.2 MSD transport mechanism
    • 6.2.3 PSAP requirements
  • 6.3 Case studies
    • 6.3.1 Germany: ADAC performs international feasibility trial of eCall
    • 6.3.2 United Kingdom: National PSAPs support private eCall services
    • 6.3.3 United States: GM OnStar provides emergency call service to 5 million cars
• Glossary
• Index

List of Figures

• Figure 1.1: Vehicle registration data (EU23+2 2007)
• Figure 1.2 : Car incident statistics (EU23 2003/2004)
• Figure 1.3: Passenger car manufacturer market shares (EU-15+2 2007)
• Figure 1.4: Premium car brand market shares (EU-15+2 2007)
• Figure 1.5: Top ten vehicle leasing companies by fleet size (Europe 2007)
• Figure 1.6: Top five vehicle rental companies by size (Europe 2007)
• Figure 1.7: Motor insurance market estimates (EU23+2 2005)
• Figure 1.8: Top 25 motor insurance providers (EU23+2 2006)
• Figure 1.9: PSAP distribution in select European countries
• Figure 1.10: Insurance-owned assistance providers (2005/2006)
• Figure 1.11: Top 10 automobile clubs in Europe (2006)
• Figure 2.1: eCall application lifecycle
• Figure 2.2: SVR application lifecycle
• Figure 2.3: Motor insurance telematics application lifecycle
• Figure 2.4: Leasing and rental fleet management application lifecycle
• Figure 2.5: Vehicle diagnostics application lifecycle
• Figure 3.1: Car telematics shipments and active subscribers (EU27+2 2006-2012)
• Figure 3.2: Car telematics shipments, by market (EU27+2 2006-2012)
• Figure 3.3: Providers of proprietary RF vehicle tracking systems
• Figure 3.4: Motor insurance telematics propositions by market
• Figure 3.5: Top five aftermarket vehicle tracking solution vendors (Europe 2007)
• Figure 3.6: Car telematics industry acquisitions and IPOs (2005-2007)
• Figure 3.7: GSM/GPS aftermarket telematics offerings by brand and market
• Figure 3.8: SIM-cards managed by telematics service providers (EU27+2 2006-2012)
• Figure 4.1: AutoGuard SVR pricing plan (January 2008)
• Figure 4.2: Cobra AT SVR subscribers, by country (Europe December 2007)
• Figure 4.3: Traqueur SVR pricing plan (January 2008)
• Figure 4.4: Examples of second tier vehicle tracking vendors in Western Europe
• Figure 4.5: Motor insurance market statistics is selected European countries (2006)
• Figure 4.6: Selected motor insurance telematics offerings (Italy 2008)
• Figure 4.7: Norwich Union Pay As You Drive price example (January 2008)
• Figure 4.8: Norwich Union Pay As You Drive price example (January 2008)
• Figure 4.9: Thatcham CAT5 and TQA system requirements
• Figure 4.10: Thatcham CAT 5 and TQA approved tracking systems (January 2008)
• Figure 5.1: Tema.Mobility system architecture
• Figure 5.2: Pricing examples for BMW ConnectedDrive (Western Europe 2008)
• Figure 5.3: Jaguar Watch and Land Rover Watch pricing plan (UK 2007)
• Figure 5.4: New subscribers for Porsche Vehicle Tracking System 2006/2007
• Figure 5.5: PSA Appel d' urgence emergency call solution
• Figure 5.6: Pricing examples for Volvo On Call (Western Europe 2008)
• Figure 6.1: eCall establishment and lifecycle
• Figure 6.2: MSD draft specification