|
|
[Report]
Gaining Competitive Advantage in Pharmaceutical Markets
Published: 2002/08
|
|

 |
|
|
|
Overview
Introduction
Scope Report
Highlights
Reasons to Purchase
DRIVERS AND TRENDS
- There are increasing levels of head-to-head competition in the
pharmaceutical industry
- Companies must strive to optimize their competitive strategy capabilities
- Success stories such as Serono' s head-to-head comparison of Rebif to
Avonex demonstrates the high levels of reward involved
Case Study 1 – Dyslipidemia: Crestor versus Lipitor versus Zocor
- What is Crestor' s position in the US and Europe? Is it likely to be much
weaker in Japan due to fierce competition from its third generation rival
itavastatin? Datamonitor' s case study will provide the answers.
Case Study 2 – Arthritis: Bextra and Celebrex versus Arcoxia and
Vioxx
- Find out whether or not Datamonitor believes that in light of the delays
with Arcoxia in the US, Pfizer/Pharmacia are likely to pull ahead of Merck
in this market.
Case Study 3 – Multiple Sclerosis: Avonex versus Rebif
- Will Rebif take substantial market share from Avonex particularly in the
US? Find out Datamonitor' s insight on the Multiple Sclerosis market.
Case Study 4 – Oncology: Iressa versus Tarceva versus Erbitux
- Will Iressa dominate the NSCLC market and significantly impair sales
growth of Erbitux and Tarceva from 2003 and 2004?
ACTION POINTS
- As physician detailing and direct-to-consumer advertising increase,
companies are increasingly incentivized to conduct head-to-head clinical
trials in order to provide physicians and patients with comparative clinical
information on efficacy and side-effects.
- Companies need to develop strong competencies to effectively plan and
execute competitive strategies while at the same time effectively managing
risk
APPENDIX
DATASETS
- Figure 1 NDA' s approved by type, 1995-2000 versus 1989-1994
- Figure 2 Phase III clinical trial results, Crestor versus Lipitor
- Figure 3 Phase III clinical results, Crestor versus Zocor versus Pravachol
- Figure 4 Relative US retail prices of commodity prescribed statins at
their most prescribed doses
- Figure 5 Forecast Lipitor, Zocor and Crestor sales, 2002-2005 ($m)
- Figure 6 Historical global sales of Vioxx versus Celebrex Q1, 2001-Q1,
2002 ($m)
- Figure 7 Forecast representation in the Cox-II market by indication, 2004
- Figure 8 Celebrex, Bextra, Vioxx and Arcoxia forecasts, 2002-2005 ($m)
- Figure 9 Rebif' s quarterly sales performance, 1999-2001
- Figure 10 Quarterly non-US sales of Avonex, Betaferon, Copaxone and Rebif,
2000-01
- Figure 11 Sales forecasts for Avonex and Rebif, 2002-2005 ($m)
- Figure 12 Sales Forecasts – Iressa, Erbitux and Tarceva,2002-2005,
($m)
- Table 1 Expected Crestor penetration by patient population
- Table 2 Phase II dose ranging study with rosuvastatin: percentage change
from baseline and comparison to atorvastatin
- Table 3 Crestor' s competitive profile versus current market leaders and
itavastatin
- Table 4 Forecast Lipitor, Zocor, and Crestor sales, 2002-2005 ($m)
- Table 5 Indications sought or received by Celebrex, Bextra, Vioxx and
Arcoxia
- Table 6 Celebrex, Bextra, Vioxx and Arcoxia forecasts, 2002-2005 ($m)
- Table 7 Leading marketed MS treatments – key facts
- Table 8 Clinical and MRI end points for EVIDENCE study
- Table 9 Sales forecasts for Avonex and Rebif, 2002-2005 ($m)
- Table 10 Leading indication under development – Iressa, Tarceva,
Erbitux
- Table 11 Comparison of phase II results in NSCLC
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Report]
Gaining Competitive Advantage in Pharmaceutical Markets
Published: 2002/08
|
Published by : Datamonitor  |
|
|
|
Product Code : DC11686 |
|
|
Please inform me when related publications are released
|
|
|