|
|
[Report]
Drivers of Utility Profitability
Published: 2007/08
|
|

 |
|
|
|
Table of Contents
- DATAMONITOR VIEW
- ANALYSIS
- This brief reviews the financial performance of 30 leading utilities
- This brief reviews the financial performance of 30 leading utilities
- 60% of utilities saw profitability fall in 2006
- Six of the 10 most profitable utilities have seen their results fall
from their 2005 peak
- RWE and EDF have substantially improved their position from among the
least profitable major utilities in Europe
- PPC and Centrica were the only utilities to make a net loss in 2006
- Only three utilities have consistently outperformed over the past five
years
- Profitability in 2006 was not a function of performance in prior years
- Profitability in 2006 was not driven by stable revenue growth over time
- The most profitable utilities in 2006 have not produced stable profit
growth over time
- The most profitable utilities are not necessarily those with the
highest growth in operating cash flow
- Profitability is not a function of size
- Economies of scale from the operation of fixed assets do not account
for differences in profitability
- Employee costs are not a driver of utility profitability over time
- Europe' s most profitable utilities derive income from different parts of
the value chain
- Top-performing utilities show a real diversity in terms of where along
the value chain operating income is generated
- Business units that are big revenue earners tend to contribute less to
operating income
- Accumulation and use of debt does not itself explain the profitability
of European utilities
- Debt leverage does not correlate to profitability
- From 2002-06, utilities that have outperformed on profit growth do not
show a consistent approach to debt leverage
- Effective use of debt capital over time does not itself explain profit
growth
- Spain, Russia, Denmark and the Czech Republic consistently account for
the most profitable utilities
- In 2006, Switzerland and the UK encompassed some of the most and least
profitable utilities
- Top-performing utilities tend to be less focused on traditional
(incumbent) markets
- Poorly performing utilities tend to be more focused on traditional
(incumbent) markets
- APPENDIX
- Definitions
- Datamonitor Consultancy
- Ask the analyst
- Disclaimer
- List of Figures
- Figure 1: Leading European utilities, in order of profitability in 2006
- Figure 2: Top decile of utilities by profitability (2006), with
five-year results
- Figure 3: Middle decile of utilities by profitability (2006), with
five-year results
- Figure 4: Bottom decile of utilities by profitability (2006), with
five-year results
- Figure 5: The 10 most profitable utilities, 2002-06
- Figure 6: Revenue growth, 2002-06
- Figure 7: Growth in net income, 2002-06
- Figure 8: Growth in operating cash flow, 2002-06
- Figure 9: Fixed assets and profitability, 2006
- Figure 10: Revenue per employee and growth rates, 2002-06
- Figure 11: Operating income by business unit segment, 2006
- Figure 12: Business unit segmentation of revenue and operating income,
2006
- Figure 13: Levels of debt leverage, 2006
- Figure 14: Average growth in net income and debt leverage, 2002-06
- Figure 15: Average growth in long-term debt and revenue, 2002-06
- Figure 16: Home markets of the most and least profitable utilities,
2006
- Figure 17: Proportion of utility revenue from incumbent and new markets
- Figure 18: Proportion of utility revenue from incumbent and new markets
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Report]
Drivers of Utility Profitability
Published: 2007/08
|
Published by : Datamonitor  |
|
|
Price:
|
Product Code : DC55713 |
|
|
Please inform me when related publications are released
|
|
|