the-infoshop.com - The vertical markets research portal
View CartView Cart
Global Information, Inc.
US: +1-860-674-8796
EU: +32-2-535-7543
SG: +65-6223-2436
  Home | Catalog | E-mail Alert | Custom Research | About The Infoshop | Contact Us | Site Map |
 

* View All Categories
Japanese Korean Chinese

[Report]

Generics Erosion Patterns in the U.S. Market

Published: 2007/04

Contact 24 hrs/day
Table of Contents

Abstract

Introduction

With an estimated $51 billion of branded drugs coming off patent between 2006 and 2011, both U.S. government insurance plans and private, third-party payers will promote increased use of generics in the future. In a data-rich report that employs analyses of 34 branded drugs facing generics competition between January 2002 and December 2006, we highlight the most effective strategies employed by pharmaceutical companies in their effort to ward off the threat of generics competition.

Get the Answers You Need to Shape Your Strategy:

  • Several factors determine how quickly a branded product loses market share. Which of these factors is particularly likely to lead to big paydays for generics manufacturers? Under what circumstances can the effects of this critical factor be muted?
  • After Zithromax lost patent protection in the United States, Pfi zer entered the generics market for Zithromax through its own generics subsidiary. How successfully did Pfi zer' s subsidiary fend off erosion of prescription share for Zithromax? What lessons can other drug companies take away from Pfi zer' s strategy?
  • Merck employed an unusual pricing strategy in order to retain its market share for Zocor, after generics entered the market for the branded product. How successful was Merck in delaying erosion of Zocor' s market share?
  • Oral solids typically experience generics erosion at a different rate than other drug formulations (oral liquids, nasal products, and patches). What factors account for this difference?

Scope

  • Methodology: thirteen fi gures and two tables delineating the data of generics erosion for 34 drugs between 2002 and 2006.
  • Patterns of generics erosion: rates of erosion for oral solids, oral liquids, and injectables; factors determining rates of erosion; branded products grouped by their erosion rates.
  • Exceptions to traditional generics erosion: drugs that did not follow traditional patterns of erosion.
  • Outlook: Data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS); pending U.S. legislation.

Selection of Brand Products Facing Generic Entry, 2002-2006

  • Accupril
  • Agrylin
  • Axid
  • Biaxin
  • Celexa
  • Cipro
  • Difl ucan
  • Duragesic
  • Effexor
  • Flonase
  • Floxin/Occufl ox
  • Glucophage XR
  • Glucotrol XL
  • Glucovance
  • Lotensin
  • Metaglip
  • Mobic
  • Monopril
  • Novantrone
  • Paraplatin
  • Paxil
  • Pravachol
  • Proscar
  • Retrovir
  • Rocephin
  • Romazicon
  • Tambocor
  • Ultram
  • Zaditor
  • Zestril/Prinivil
  • Zithromax
  • Zocor
  • Zofran
  • Zoloft
Table of Contents

[Report]
Generics Erosion Patterns in the U.S. Market
Published: 2007/04
Published by : Decision Resources, Inc. Decision Resources, Inc.

US $ 1,112.00 PDF by E-mail (Single User License)
>
Product Code : DR50960
Please inform me when related publications are released
InfoWatch

Available 24 Hours a Day
US: 1-860-674-8796 EU: 32-2-535-7543 SG: 65-6223-2436
The vertical markets research portal
© 2009, the-infoshop.com by Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.