Abstract
In a first ruling on the legality and limits for courtesy overdraft fees,
Britain' s High Court has determined that the U.K. Office of Fair Trading may
challenge the 3.5 billion pounds in overdraft charges levied by banks under
the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulation 1999.
While consumer protection laws in the U.S. are different from those of the
U.K., the first salvo of legislative oversight of U.S. courtesy overdraft
triggering-events, opt-out availability and check posting to maximize
overdraft events has been fired in the form of H.R. 946:Consumre Overdraft
Protection Fair Practices Act.
If the High Court continues to rule against the High Street Banks, the impact
in the U.S. will be an emboldened ground swell of populist and legislative
enthusiasm for reigning in the overdrafts generating $17.5 billion for U.S.
banks.