EMBEDDED SOFTWARE MARKET INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM, 2007 - VOLUME 07: EMBEDDED SOFTWARE TEST AUTOMATION TOOLS

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

• ON THE WORLD MARKET FOR EMBEDDED TEST AUTOMATION TOOLS
• Market Developments and Segmentations
• Competitive Landscape
• Key Success Requirements

II. SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY

• SCOPE
• Application Segments
• METHODOLOGY

III. MARKET DEVELOPMENTS AND SEGMENTATIONS

• MARKET OVERVIEW
• DEVELOPMENTS, TRENDS AND STRATEGIC ISSUES
• Market for Static Analysis Tools to Maintain High Rate of Revenue Growth
• Increasing Adoption of Testing Tools for Non-Safety-Critical Application
• Development
• Use of Multi-core Processors Will Drive Test Automation Tool Investment
• Growing Project Complexity to Increase Revenue Growth
• MARKET ESTIMATES, FORECASTS, AND DRIVERS
• Current and Forecast
• Three-Year Global Forecast Segmented by Product and Service Category
• Three-Year Global Forecast Segmented by Geographic Region
• Three-Year Global Forecast Segmented by Vertical Market

IV. AGGREGATE STATISTICS ON EMBEDDED SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS'

• REQUIREMENTS
• ANALYSIS OF EMBEDDED SOFTWARE
• AND PREFERENCES

V. COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

• Market Share Leaders and Positioning
• Other Competitive Markets

VI. VENDOR PROFILES

• COVERITY, INC.
• THE FANFARE GROUP, INC.
• GRAMMATECH, INC.
• IBM CORPORATION
• INFORMATION PROCESSING LTD.
• KLOCWORK INC.
• LDRA SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY
• PARASOFT CORPORATION
• POLYSPACE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
• THE PROGRAMMING RESEARCH GROUP
• TELELOGIC AB
• TESTQUEST, INC.

VII. KEY SUCCESS REQUIREMENTS

• SUMMARIES AND OBSERVATIONS

APPENDIX A: VENDOR LIST

APPENDIX B: STATISTICS ON EMBEDDED SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS USING TEST AUTOMATION TOOLS

• III-1 Current Development Project Use of Test Automation Tools (Percent of Respondents, N = 538 )
• III-2 Worldwide Shipments of Embedded Software Test Automation Tools and Related Services, Segmented by Product Type (Percent of Dollars)
• III-3 Worldwide Shipments of Embedded Software Test Automation Tools and Related Services, Segmented by Product Type; 2006-2009 (Millions of Dollars)
• III-4 Total Lines of Application Code (Percent of Respondents)
• III-5 Typical Development Project Geographic Team Distribution (Percent of Respondents)
• III-6 Number of Project Starts within company Per Year by Surveyed Developers, Segmented by Test Automation Tool Use
• III-7 Number of Project Starts within company Per Year by Surveyed Developers, Segmented by Test Automation Tool Use (Percent of Respondents)
• III-8 Worldwide Shipments of Embedded Software Test Automation Tools and Related Services Through 2009 (Millions of Dollars).
• III-9 Worldwide Shipments of Embedded Software Test Automation Tools and Related Services Segmented by Product/Service (Percent of Dollars)
• III-10 Worldwide Shipments of Embedded Software Test Automation Tools and Related Services, Segmented by Product/Service; 2006-2009 (Millions of Dollars)
• III-11 Importance of Factors in Purchasing Decision for Development Tools by Developers also Using a Test Automation Tool (Average of Respondents; 1 = Not at all important, 5 = Very important)
• III-12 Worldwide Shipments of Embedded Software Test Automation Tools and Related Services Segmented by Geographic Region (Percent of Dollars)
• III-13 Worldwide Shipments of Embedded Software Test Automation Tools and Related Services, Segmented by Geographic Region; 2006-2009 (Millions of Dollars)
• III-14 Use of Test Automation Tools, Segmented by Geographic Region (Percent of Respondents, N = 117)
• III-15 Current Development Project Use of Test Automation Tools, Segmented by Region
• III-16 Worldwide Shipments of Embedded Software Test Automation Tools and Related Services Segmented by Vertical Market (Percent of Dollars)
• III-17 Worldwide Shipments of Embedded Software Test Automation Tools and Related Services, Segmented by Vertical Market; 2006-2009 (Millions of Dollars)

• IV-1 Survey Respondents Segmented by Geographic Region (Percent of Respondents, N = 794)
• IV-2 Survey Respondents Segmented by Vertical Market (Percent of Respondents, N = 794)
• IV-3 Current Embedded System being Developed a New Design or Enhancement to Previous Design (Percent of Respondents, N = 770)
• IV-4 Estimate of Elapsed Time between Design/Specification Stage to Shipping Date (Percent of Respondents, N = 781)
• IV-5 Number of Engineers Working on Current Project (Percent of Respondents, N = 767)
• IV-6 Number of Engineers working on Current Project by Type (Average of Respondents, N = 767)
• IV-7 Number of Engineers Working at Company (Percent of Respondents, N = 603)
• IV-8 Number of Engineers working at Company by Type (Average of Respondents, N = 603)
• IV-9 Percentage of Project Development Time By Stages (Average of Respondents, N = 645)
• IV-10 Description of Processor Architecture Used in Current Project (Percent of Respondents, N = 778)
• IV-11 Primary MPU/MCU Architecture Used in Current Project and Expected to be Used in Two Years (Percent of Respondents)
• IV-12 Technologies/Components/Protocols Currently Used and Expected to be Used in Two Years (Percent of Respondents)
• IV-13 Real Time Requirements On Current Project (Percent of Respondents, N = 737)
• IV-14 Interrupt Response Requirements (Percent of Respondents, N = 574)
• IV-15 Context Switch Response Requirements (Percent of Respondents, N = 341)
• IV-16 ROM Requirements for Current Project (Percent of Respondents, N = 707)
• IV-17 RAM Requirements for Current Project (Percent of Respondents, N = 707)
• IV-18 Flash Memory Requirements for Current Project (Percent of Respondents, N = 699)
• IV-19 Total Lines of Application Code Once the Project is Complete (Percent of Respondents, N = 692)
• IV-20 Percent of Application Code Leveraged From Previous Designs (Percent of Respondents, N = 677)
• IV-21 Debugged Lines of Code Written Per Software Developer Per Month (Percent of Respondents, N = 675)
• IV-22 Number of Operating Systems on the Current Project (Percent of Respondents, N = 649)
• IV-23 Primary Operating System Used for the Previous Project, Current Project, and Planned for Next Project (Percent of Respondents)
• IV-24 Satisfaction with Current OS/RTOS (Average of Respondents, 1 = Very Dissatisfied, 5 = Very Satisfied)
• IV-25 Channel That Current OS/RTOS Was Obtained/Purchased Through (Percent of Respondents, N = 459)
• IV-26 Importance of Selection Criteria in Selection of Embedded OS (Average of Respondents, 1 = Not at all important, 5 = Very important)
• IV-27 Total Costs of Development ($US) (Percent of Respondents, N = 447)
• IV-28 Percent of Total Cost of Projects Accounted for by Software Development (Software Development costs include labor, Software licensing fees, and infrastructure to support development and deployment. ) (Percent of Respondents, N = 553)
• IV-29 Percent of Software Development Costs Accounted for by Commercial OS and Tools Licensing (Percent of Respondents, N = 544)
• IV-30 Prefer to get Commercial Solutions (RTOS, tools, etc) from a Single Vendor or Multiple Vendors (Percent of Respondents, N = 591)
• IV-31 Who Most Influences the Decision to Purchase Software for Your Embedded Projects (Percent of Respondents, N = 600)
• IV-32 Primary Software Development Tools Channel (Percent of Respondents, N = 589)
• IV-33 Importance of Factors in Purchasing Decision for Development Tools (Average of Respondents; 1 = Not at all important, 5 = Very important)
• IV-34 Approximate Software Development Tools Budget per Developer per Year (Percent of Responses, N = 478)
• IV-35 Programming Languages Currently Used and Expected to Be Used in Two Years (Percent of Respondents)
• IV-36 Primary Host Development Platform Currently Used and Expected to Be Used in Two Years (Percent of Respondents)
• IV-37 Software Design Methodologies Currently Used and Expected to Be Used in Two Years (Percent of Respondents)
• IV-38 Use of Development Tools on Current Project (Percent of Respondents)
• IV-39 Estimate the total Number of units shipped (include all products) by your company (Percent of Respondents, N = 446)
• IV-40 Total Units shipped by type of OS (Average Percent of Units Shipped)
• IV-41 Number of Project Starts within company Per Year (Percent of Respondents, N = 490)
• IV-42 Percentage of Project Starts Completed Ahead, Behind, On Schedule, and Canceled Annually Per Company (Average Percent of Project Starts)
• IV-43 Average Amount of Time Project Ran Before Cancellation (Percent of Responses, N = 407)
• IV-44 Predominant Factors Causing Projects to Be Canceled (Percent of Responses, N = 407)
• IV-45 Average Number of Months Projects Run Late (Percent of Responses, N = 459)
• IV-46 Predominant Factors Causing Projects to Be Late (Percent of Responses, N = 511)
• IV-47 Survey Respondents' Primary Job Function (Percent of Responses, N = 555)
• IV-48 Survey Respondents' Age (Percent of Responses, N = 539)
• IV-49 Survey Respondents' Highest Level of Education (Percent of Responses, N = 553)
• IV-50 Survey Respondents' Total Years Developing Embedded Systems (Percent of Respondents, N = 552)
• IV-51 Survey Respondents' Total Number of Embedded Projects Worked On (Percent of Respondents, N = 529)

• V-1 Worldwide Shipments of Embedded Software Test Automation Tools and Related Services, Segmented by Vendor Share (Millions of Dollars)
• V-2 Primary Test Automation Tool Used in Current Project; N = 117 (Percent of Respondents)